Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation network organisation and clinical outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greater Paris, France: a multicentre cohort study.
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
/ adverse effects
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Humans
Intensive Care Units
/ organization & administration
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Pulmonary Embolism
/ epidemiology
Renal Insufficiency
/ epidemiology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
/ therapy
SARS-CoV-2
Survival Analysis
Journal
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
23
11
2020
revised:
03
02
2021
accepted:
09
02
2021
pubmed:
23
4
2021
medline:
18
8
2021
entrez:
22
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the Île-de-France region (henceforth termed Greater Paris), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was considered early in the COVID-19 pandemic. We report ECMO network organisation and outcomes during the first wave of the pandemic. In this multicentre cohort study, we present an analysis of all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe ARDS requiring ECMO who were admitted to 17 Greater Paris intensive care units between March 8 and June 3, 2020. Central regulation for ECMO indications and pooling of resources were organised for the Greater Paris intensive care units, with six mobile ECMO teams available for the region. Details of complications (including ECMO-related complications, renal replacement therapy, and pulmonary embolism), clinical outcomes, survival status at 90 days after ECMO initiation, and causes of death are reported. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pre-ECMO variables independently associated with 90-day survival after ECMO. The 302 patients included who underwent ECMO had a median age of 52 years (IQR 45-58) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II of 40 (31-56), and 235 (78%) of whom were men. 165 (55%) were transferred after cannulation by a mobile ECMO team. Before ECMO, 285 (94%) patients were prone positioned, median driving pressure was 18 cm H Beyond associations with similar factors to those reported on ECMO for non-COVID-19 ARDS, 90-day survival among ECMO-assisted patients with COVID-19 was strongly associated with a centre's experience in venovenous ECMO during the previous year. Early ECMO management in centres with a high venovenous ECMO case volume should be advocated, by applying centralisation and regulation of ECMO indications, which should also help to prevent a shortage of resources. None.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In the Île-de-France region (henceforth termed Greater Paris), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was considered early in the COVID-19 pandemic. We report ECMO network organisation and outcomes during the first wave of the pandemic.
METHODS
In this multicentre cohort study, we present an analysis of all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe ARDS requiring ECMO who were admitted to 17 Greater Paris intensive care units between March 8 and June 3, 2020. Central regulation for ECMO indications and pooling of resources were organised for the Greater Paris intensive care units, with six mobile ECMO teams available for the region. Details of complications (including ECMO-related complications, renal replacement therapy, and pulmonary embolism), clinical outcomes, survival status at 90 days after ECMO initiation, and causes of death are reported. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pre-ECMO variables independently associated with 90-day survival after ECMO.
FINDINGS
The 302 patients included who underwent ECMO had a median age of 52 years (IQR 45-58) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II of 40 (31-56), and 235 (78%) of whom were men. 165 (55%) were transferred after cannulation by a mobile ECMO team. Before ECMO, 285 (94%) patients were prone positioned, median driving pressure was 18 cm H
INTERPRETATION
Beyond associations with similar factors to those reported on ECMO for non-COVID-19 ARDS, 90-day survival among ECMO-assisted patients with COVID-19 was strongly associated with a centre's experience in venovenous ECMO during the previous year. Early ECMO management in centres with a high venovenous ECMO case volume should be advocated, by applying centralisation and regulation of ECMO indications, which should also help to prevent a shortage of resources.
FUNDING
None.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33887246
pii: S2213-2600(21)00096-5
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00096-5
pmc: PMC8055207
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
851-862Investigateurs
Charles Juvin
(C)
Thibault Schoell
(T)
Cosimo D'Alessandro
(C)
Sofica Marin
(S)
Nathalie Nardone
(N)
Pierre Demondion
(P)
Horacio Meyer
(H)
Karl Bounader
(K)
Alexander Moiroux
(A)
Ali Akamkam
(A)
Guillaume Fadel
(G)
Erwan Randrianalisoa
(E)
Sébastien Cusquel
(S)
Patrice LE Gloahec
(P)
Elisabeth Hirschauer
(E)
Fabrice Musquet
(F)
Pierre-Marie Jego
(PM)
Hélène Guedes
(H)
Théophile Roy
(T)
Lina Mercereau
(L)
Emmanuel Corvol
(E)
Anne Laboure
(A)
Flore Vilanove
(F)
Marco Peperoni
(M)
Dariène Machado
(D)
Aly Sely
(A)
Marion Fortanier
(M)
Séverine Gantois
(S)
Emilie Tran
(E)
Elisabeth Bosq
(E)
Aurélie Fontanier
(A)
Alice Morin
(A)
Jocelyne Cousin
(J)
Stéphanie Bovagnet
(S)
Charles Edouard Luyt
(CE)
Guillaume Hekimian
(G)
Nicolas Brechot
(N)
Marc Pineton de Chambrun
(M)
Cyrielle Desnos
(C)
Juliette Chomeloux
(J)
Jeremy Arzoine
(J)
Emmanuelle Guerin
(E)
Antoine Monsel
(A)
Guillaume Voiriot
(G)
David Levy
(D)
Elodie Baron
(E)
Alexandra Beurton
(A)
Juliette Chommeloux
(J)
Meng Paris
(M)
Safaa Nemlaghi
(S)
Pierre Bay
(P)
Alexandre Demoule
(A)
Bertrand Guidet
(B)
Jean Michel Constantin
(JM)
Muriel Fartoukh
(M)
Martin Dres
(M)
Patrick Nataf
(P)
Guillaume Franchineau
(G)
Lucie Le Fevre
(L)
Richard Raffoul
(R)
Soleiman Alkhoder
(S)
Walid Ghodbane
(W)
Angelo Pisani
(A)
Wael Braham
(W)
Ali Bessem Gara
(A)
Pierre Mordant
(P)
Yves-Hervé Castier
(YH)
Etienne de Montmollin
(E)
Lila Bouadma
(L)
Jean-François Timsit
(JF)
Olivier Langeron
(O)
Quentin de Roux
(Q)
Claire Alessandri
(C)
Margot Arminot-Frémaux
(M)
Simon Clariot
(S)
Thomas Dessalle
(T)
Agathe Kudela
(A)
André Ly
(A)
Arnaud Meffert
(A)
Elena Skripkina
(E)
Antonio Fiore
(A)
Costin Radu
(C)
Eleonora Dupuy-Montbrun
(E)
Christian Latremouille
(C)
Olaf Mercier
(O)
Philippe Deleuze
(P)
François Stephan
(F)
Jacques Duranteau
(J)
Christian Richard
(C)
Marie Werner
(M)
Jean-Louis Teboul
(JL)
Xavier Monnet
(X)
Hassan Debbagh
(H)
Alain Chapelier
(A)
Julien De Wolf
(J)
Matthieu Glorion
(M)
Ciprian Pricopi
(C)
Francesco Cassiano
(F)
Sébastien Jacquemin
(S)
Guillaume Tachon
(G)
François Parquin
(F)
Benjamin Zuber
(B)
Alain Carriou
(A)
Jean-Paul Mira
(JP)
Julien Charpentier
(J)
Frederic Pene
(F)
Lee Nguyen
(L)
Sébastian Voicu
(S)
Nicolas Deye
(N)
Isabelle Malissin
(I)
Laetitia Sutterlin
(L)
Giulia Naim
(G)
Adrien Pépin-Lehalleur
(A)
Aymen Mrad
(A)
Jean-Michel Ekhérian
(JM)
Philippe Nguyen
(P)
Georgios Sidéris
(G)
Dominique Vodovar
(D)
Caroline Grant
(C)
Mattéo Arcelli
(M)
Alban Copie
(A)
Zaccaria Errabih
(Z)
Antoine Gonde
(A)
Adèle Magalhaes
(A)
Edouard Meurisse
(E)
Kiyoko Nitenberg
(K)
Arthur Perault
(A)
Lucile Perrin
(L)
Maxime Renaux
(M)
Sophie Marqué
(S)
Luis Ensenyat-Martin
(L)
Eric Delpierre
(E)
Matthieu Duprey
(M)
Daniel da Silva
(D)
Bruno Verdière
(B)
Julien Amour
(J)
Marina Clément
(M)
Yves Ollivier
(Y)
Tristan Morichau-Beauchant
(T)
Fabrice Daviaud
(F)
Camille Le Breton
(C)
Santiago Freita-Ramos
(S)
Marc Amouretti
(M)
Pierre Antoine Billiet
(PA)
Myriam Dao
(M)
Louis Marie Dumont
(LM)
Laura Federici
(L)
Baptiste Gaborieau
(B)
Pierre Postel-Vinay
(P)
Constance Vuillard
(C)
Noémie Zucman
(N)
Didier Dreyfuss
(D)
Jean Damien Ricard
(JD)
Damien Roux
(D)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests GL reports lecture fees from Livanova and Abiomed, outside of the submitted work. MS reports lecture fees from Getinge, Dräger, and Xenios, outside of the submitted work. BC reports consulting and lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Orion Pharma, Amomed, and Nordic Pharma, outside of the submitted work. RS has received lecture fees from Baxter, outside of the submitted work. DL reports speaker fees and is a member of advisory boards for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Masimo, outside of the submitted work. AC reports grants and personal fees from Getinge, and personal fees from Baxter and Xenios, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e24
pubmed: 32178774
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1704-13
pubmed: 23907497
Chest. 2020 Aug;158(2):603-607
pubmed: 32339510
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1914-1922
pubmed: 30291378
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 15;200(8):1002-1012
pubmed: 31144997
J Artif Organs. 2021 Jun;24(2):277-281
pubmed: 32789604
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 15;191(8):864-6
pubmed: 25876197
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2030-2040
pubmed: 33031652
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1245-1246
pubmed: 32074258
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e61S-74S
pubmed: 25144591
ASAIO J. 2020 Jul;66(7):707-721
pubmed: 32604322
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e17S-43S
pubmed: 25144407
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
pubmed: 8254858
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481
pubmed: 32105632
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):611-614
pubmed: 32776849
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 24;378(21):1965-1975
pubmed: 29791822
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):518-526
pubmed: 32203711
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;17(8):779-88
pubmed: 27187531
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):846-848
pubmed: 32125452
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1071-1078
pubmed: 32987008
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;47(1):60-73
pubmed: 33211135
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):e89
pubmed: 33129419
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 15;191(8):894-901
pubmed: 25695688
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e1S-e16S
pubmed: 25144334
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 2;24(1):274
pubmed: 32487231
J Med Vasc. 2020 Sep;45(5):268-274
pubmed: 32862984
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(4):1621-1629.e2
pubmed: 29246547
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Nov;8(11):1121-1131
pubmed: 32798468
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
pubmed: 8844239
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440