Survey on Colostrum Management by Dairy Farmers in the Netherlands.
calf feeding
colostrum
colostrum management
dairy farm
survey
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
20
01
2021
accepted:
05
03
2021
entrez:
23
4
2021
pubmed:
24
4
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Colostrum feeding is essential for the transfer of passive immunity and health of newborn calves. Information on current colostrum management practices to reduce calf morbidity and mortality is important but lacking for Dutch dairy herds. We therefore conducted a survey to investigate colostrum management strategies on Dutch dairy farms. The survey was specifically focused on the most recently born calf and was returned by 107 respondents (response rate of 13.4%). The mean amount of colostrum fed at first feeding was 2.9 liters. Overall, 79% of farmers provided the calf with at least 6 liters of colostrum in up to three feedings. The majority of respondents (84%) claimed to provide the calf with colostrum for the first time within 2 h post-partum. Using ordinal logistic regression and Wilcoxon rank sum test, we found no differences in time to first colostrum feeding or total amount of colostrum fed between bull calves and heifer calves, respectively. Ordinal logistic regression showed no significant differences in time to first colostrum feeding or time between calving and removing the calf from the dam between AMS and conventional milking herds. Two sample
Identifiants
pubmed: 33889605
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.656391
pmc: PMC8056021
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
656391Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Robbers, Bijkerk, Koets, Benedictus, Nielen and Jorritsma.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4857-4863
pubmed: 26995126
Can Vet J. 2009 Mar;50(3):275-81
pubmed: 19436479
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Oct;101(10):9229-9244
pubmed: 29935825
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Feb;91(2):704-12
pubmed: 18218758
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):4489-4497
pubmed: 30852014
Animal. 2013 Nov;7(11):1824-32
pubmed: 23916317
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Aug 1;219(3):357-9
pubmed: 11497052
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2019 Nov;35(3):535-556
pubmed: 31590901
Am J Vet Res. 2008 Sep;69(9):1158-63
pubmed: 18764687
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4640-5
pubmed: 25935243
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2008 Mar;24(1):19-39
pubmed: 18299030
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Sep;90(9):4108-16
pubmed: 17699028
Animal. 2016 May;10(5):868-77
pubmed: 26857400
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Aug 15;237(4):420-8
pubmed: 20707753
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3521-3528
pubmed: 32037177
J Vet Intern Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;14(6):569-77
pubmed: 11110376
Ann Rech Vet. 1983;14(4):382-9
pubmed: 6677179
J Anim Sci. 2020 Aug 1;98(8):
pubmed: 32697841
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jul;88(7):2571-8
pubmed: 15956318
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Aug;103(8):7611-7624
pubmed: 32448583
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014 Aug 15;160(3-4):225-9
pubmed: 24906350