Association of Ligamentous Laxity, Male Sex, Chronicity, Meniscal Injury, and Posterior Tibial Slope With a High-Grade Preoperative Pivot Shift: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STABILITY Study.
anterior cruciate ligament
hyperextension
instability
knee
laxity
pivot shift
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez:
23
4
2021
pubmed:
24
4
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A spectrum of anterolateral rotatory laxity exists in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees. Understanding of the factors contributing to a high-grade pivot shift continues to be refined. To investigate factors associated with a high-grade preoperative pivot shift and to evaluate the relationship between this condition and baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. A post hoc analysis was performed of 618 patients with ACL deficiency deemed high risk for reinjury. A binary logistic regression model was developed, with high-grade pivot shift as the dependent variable. Age, sex, Beighton score, chronicity of the ACL injury, posterior third medial or lateral meniscal injury, and tibial slope were selected as independent variables. The importance of knee hyperextension as a component of the Beighton score was assessed using receiver operator characteristic curves. Baseline PROMs were compared between patients with and without a high-grade pivot. Six factors were associated with a high-grade pivot shift: Beighton score (each additional point; odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30; Ligamentous laxity, male sex, posterior third medial or lateral meniscal injury, increased posterior tibial slope, and chronicity were associated with a high-grade pivot shift in this population deemed high risk for repeat ACL injury. The effect of tibial slope may be accentuated by the presence of meniscal injury, supporting the need for meniscal preservation. Baseline PROMs were similar between patients with and without a high-grade pivot shift.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A spectrum of anterolateral rotatory laxity exists in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees. Understanding of the factors contributing to a high-grade pivot shift continues to be refined.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To investigate factors associated with a high-grade preoperative pivot shift and to evaluate the relationship between this condition and baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
METHODS
A post hoc analysis was performed of 618 patients with ACL deficiency deemed high risk for reinjury. A binary logistic regression model was developed, with high-grade pivot shift as the dependent variable. Age, sex, Beighton score, chronicity of the ACL injury, posterior third medial or lateral meniscal injury, and tibial slope were selected as independent variables. The importance of knee hyperextension as a component of the Beighton score was assessed using receiver operator characteristic curves. Baseline PROMs were compared between patients with and without a high-grade pivot.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Six factors were associated with a high-grade pivot shift: Beighton score (each additional point; odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30;
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Ligamentous laxity, male sex, posterior third medial or lateral meniscal injury, increased posterior tibial slope, and chronicity were associated with a high-grade pivot shift in this population deemed high risk for repeat ACL injury. The effect of tibial slope may be accentuated by the presence of meniscal injury, supporting the need for meniscal preservation. Baseline PROMs were similar between patients with and without a high-grade pivot shift.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33889648
doi: 10.1177/23259671211000038
pii: 10.1177_23259671211000038
pmc: PMC8033400
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671211000038Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This study was funded by an ISAKOS/OREF grant (2014; International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine/Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation). R.G.M. has received speaking fees from Bioventus, Pendopharm, Sanofi, and Smith & Nephew. T.S. has received consulting fees from Conmed and speaking fees from Conmed, Joint Operations, and Smith & Nephew. P.C.M.V. has received consulting fees from Conmed and speaking fees from Conmed and Smith & Nephew. A.M.J.G. has received consulting fees from Olympus, Ossur, and Smith & Nephew and royalties from Graymont and Smith & Nephew. L.A.H. has received consulting fees and speaking fees from Conmed. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2401-2408
pubmed: 28536855
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2362-2370
pubmed: 29150746
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2800-4
pubmed: 24036571
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Apr;34(4):187-93
pubmed: 15128188
Arthroscopy. 2020 May;36(5):1398-1406
pubmed: 32001277
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2820-2826
pubmed: 27474383
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96
pubmed: 9699158
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1080-5
pubmed: 26821957
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2859-2864
pubmed: 30193083
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-34
pubmed: 8536037
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2865-2872
pubmed: 30193087
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2394-2401
pubmed: 31318611
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jul-Aug;(150):247-52
pubmed: 7428229
Physiother Can. 2009 Fall;61(4):189-94; discussion 195-6
pubmed: 20808479
Arthroscopy. 2020 May;36(5):1407-1408
pubmed: 32370902
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13
pubmed: 11573919
Arthroscopy. 2017 Oct;33(10):1852-1858
pubmed: 28599980
Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Dec;74(6):594-9
pubmed: 17888709
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Oct;75(5):594-9
pubmed: 15513493
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Apr;25(4):1170-1176
pubmed: 27154279
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):213-220
pubmed: 31876642
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar;27(3):868-874
pubmed: 30242454
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):277-284
pubmed: 30525899
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3724-3730
pubmed: 29947841
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):905-11
pubmed: 25589386
Arthroscopy. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(9):955-9
pubmed: 12426537
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Feb;29(2):633-640
pubmed: 32303800
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;30(5):697-703
pubmed: 12239005
Am J Sports Med. 1998 May-Jun;26(3):350-9
pubmed: 9617395
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):362-9
pubmed: 26620298
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2213-2220
pubmed: 32579396
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):73-9
pubmed: 23149019
Psychosom Med. 2004 May-Jun;66(3):411-21
pubmed: 15184705
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug;48(10):2408-2417
pubmed: 32631068
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3020-3028
pubmed: 29974175
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1319-1325
pubmed: 28823037
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3126-3131
pubmed: 27507843
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):646-651
pubmed: 30310925
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 7;8(7):2325967120926159
pubmed: 32685564
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Dec 11;6(12):2325967118813917
pubmed: 30560143
Ann Rheum Dis. 1973 Sep;32(5):413-8
pubmed: 4751776
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Apr;20(4):767-77
pubmed: 22218828
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Nov 03;1:64
pubmed: 14613558
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):285-297
pubmed: 31940222
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov 1;45(3):541-549
pubmed: 27802963
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1778-87
pubmed: 20595556