Perceptual rivalry with vibrotactile stimuli.
Correlation analysis
Levelt’s propositions
Perceptual rivalry
Scaling property
Vibrotactile
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
accepted:
08
02
2021
pubmed:
24
4
2021
medline:
28
7
2021
entrez:
23
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In perceptual rivalry, ambiguous sensory information leads to dynamic changes in the perceptual interpretation of fixed stimuli. This phenomenon occurs when participants receive sensory stimuli that support two or more distinct interpretations; this results in spontaneous alternations between possible perceptual interpretations. Perceptual rivalry has been widely studied across different sensory modalities including vision, audition, and to a limited extent, in the tactile domain. Common features of perceptual rivalry across various ambiguous visual and auditory paradigms characterize the randomness of switching times and their dependence on input strength manipulations (Levelt's propositions). It is still unclear whether the general characteristics of perceptual rivalry are preserved with tactile stimuli. This study aims to introduce a simple tactile stimulus capable of generating perceptual rivalry and explores whether general features of perceptual rivalry from other modalities extend to the tactile domain. Our results confirm that Levelt's proposition II extends to tactile bistability, and that the stochastic characteristics of irregular perceptual alternations agree with non-tactile modalities. An analysis of correlations between subsequent perceptual phases reveals a significant positive correlation at lag 1 (as found in visual bistability), and a negative correlation for lag 2 (in contrast with visual bistability).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33890241
doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02278-1
pii: 10.3758/s13414-021-02278-1
pmc: PMC8302565
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2613-2624Informations de copyright
© 2021. Crown.
Références
Barniv, D., & Nelken, I. (2015). Auditory streaming as an online classification process with evidence accumulation. PloS one, 10(12).
Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?. Perception, 9(2), 223–231.
pubmed: 7375329
doi: 10.1068/p090223
pmcid: 7375329
Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96(1), 145.
pubmed: 2648445
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.145
pmcid: 2648445
Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology.
Brascamp, J. W., Van Ee, R., Pestman, W. R., & Van Den Berg, A. V. (2005). Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision, 5(4), 1–1.
doi: 10.1167/5.4.1
Brascamp, J. W., Klink, P. C., & Levelt, Willem JM (2015). The ’laws’ of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt’s propositions. Vision Research, 109, 20–37.
pubmed: 25749677
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019
pmcid: 25749677
Burtt, H. E. (1917). Tactual illusions of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(5), 371.
doi: 10.1037/h0074614
Carter, O., Konkle, T., Wang, Q., Hayward, V., & Moore, C. (2008). Tactile rivalry demonstrated with an ambiguous apparent-motion quartet. Current Biology, 18(14), 1050–1054.
pubmed: 18635355
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.027
pmcid: 18635355
Cao, R., Braun, J., & Mattia, M. (2014). Stochastic accumulation by cortical columns may explain the scalar property of multistable perception. Physical Review Letters, 113(9), 098103.
pubmed: 25216009
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.098103
pmcid: 25216009
Cao, R., Pastukhov, A., Aleshin, S., Mattia, M., & Braun, J. (2020). Instability with a purpose: how the visual brain makes decisions in a volatile world. bioRxiv.
Cao, R., Pastukhov, A., Mattia, M., & Braun, J. (2016). Collective activity of many bistable assemblies reproduces characteristic dynamics of multistable perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 36 (26), 6957–6972.
pubmed: 27358454
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4626-15.2016
pmcid: 27358454
Clarey, J. C., Tweedale, R., & Calford, M. B. (1996). Interhemispheric modulation of somatosensory receptive fields: evidence for plasticity in primary somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6(2), 196–206.
pubmed: 8670650
doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.2.196
pmcid: 8670650
Conrad, V., Vitello, M. P., & Noppeney, U. (2012). Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch. Psychological Science, 23(8), 940–948.
pubmed: 22810167
doi: 10.1177/0956797612438735
pmcid: 22810167
Denham, S. L., Farkas, D., Van Ee, R., Taranu, M., Kocsis, Z., Wimmer, M., ..., Winkler, I. (2018). Similar but separate systems underlie perceptual bistability in vision and audition. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–10.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25587-2
Deutsch, D. (1974). An auditory illusion. Nature, 251(5473), 307–309.
pubmed: 4427654
doi: 10.1038/251307a0
pmcid: 4427654
Eshel, N., Ruff, C. C., Spitzer, B., Blankenburg, F., & Driver, J. (2010). Effects of parietal TMS on somatosensory judgments challenge interhemispheric rivalry accounts. Neuropsychologia, 48(12), 3470–3481.
pubmed: 20678510
pmcid: 2956832
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.031
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (n.d.) A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods.
Ferrington, D. G., & Rowe, M. A. R. K. (1980). Differential contributions to coding of cutaneous vibratory information by cortical somatosensory areas I and II. Journal of Neurophysiology, 43(2), 310–331.
pubmed: 7381523
doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.2.310
pmcid: 7381523
Fox, R., & Herrmann, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(9), 432– 436.
doi: 10.3758/BF03208783
Gengerelli, J. A. (1948). Apparent movement in relation to homonymous and heteronymous stimulation of the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(5), 592.
pubmed: 18885707
doi: 10.1037/h0062438
pmcid: 18885707
Haladjian, H. H., Anstis, S., Wexler, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2020). The tactile quartet: Comparing ambiguous apparent motion in tactile and visual stimuli. Perception, 49(1), 61–80.
pubmed: 31707914
doi: 10.1177/0301006619886237
pmcid: 31707914
Hämäläinen, H., Hiltunen, J., & Titievskaja, I. (2002). Activation of somatosensory cortical areas varies with attentional state: an fMRI study. Behavioural Brain Research, 135(1-2), 159–165.
pubmed: 12356446
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00145-6
pmcid: 12356446
Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R. (2006). Transient suppression of ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex during tactile finger stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(21), 5819–5824.
pubmed: 16723540
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5536-05.2006
pmcid: 16723540
Hupé, J.-M., & Rubin, N. (2003). The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Research, 43(5), 531–548.
pubmed: 12594999
doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00593-X
pmcid: 12594999
Iwamura, Y., Taoka, M., & Iriki, A. (2001). Book review: Bilateral activity and callosal connections in the somatosensory cortex. The Neuroscientist, 7(5), 419–429.
pubmed: 11597101
doi: 10.1177/107385840100700511
pmcid: 11597101
Kastrup, A., Baudewig, J., Schnaudigel, S., Huonker, R., Becker, L., Sohns, J. M., ..., Witte, O. W. (2008). Behavioral correlates of negative bold signal changes in the primary somatosensory cortex. NeuroImage, 41(4), 1364–1371.
pubmed: 18495495
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.049
pmcid: 18495495
Kirman, J. H. (1974). Tactile apparent movement: The effects of interstimulus onset interval and stimulus duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 15(1), 1–6.
doi: 10.3758/BF03205819
Korvenoja, A., Wikstrom, H., Huttunen, J., Virtanan, J., Laine, P., Aronen, H. J., ..., Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1995). Activation of ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortex by median nerve stimulation. Neuroreport, 6(18), 2589–2593.
pubmed: 8741769
doi: 10.1097/00001756-199512150-00033
pmcid: 8741769
Lathrop, R. G (1966). First-order response dependencies at a differential brightness threshold. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 120.
pubmed: 5967717
doi: 10.1037/h0023314
pmcid: 5967717
Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(7), 1439–1459.
doi: 10.3758/APP.71.7.1439
Lederman, S. J., & Jones, L. A. (2011). Tactile and haptic illusions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 4(4), 273–294.
pubmed: 26963655
doi: 10.1109/TOH.2011.2
pmcid: 26963655
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 254–264.
pubmed: 10377540
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
pmcid: 10377540
Levelt, W. JM (1965). On binocular rivalry. Ph.D. Thesis Van Gorcum Assen.
Liaci, E., Bach, M., van Elst, L. T., Heinrich, S. P., & Kornmeier, J. (2016). Ambiguity in tactile apparent motion perception. PloS One, 11(5).
Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996a). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature, 380(6575), 621.
pubmed: 8602261
doi: 10.1038/380621a0
pmcid: 8602261
Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996b). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature, 380(6575), 621.
pubmed: 8602261
doi: 10.1038/380621a0
pmcid: 8602261
Maldjian, J. A., Gottschalk, A., Patel, R. S., Detre, J. A., & Alsop, D. C. (1999). The sensory somatotopic map of the human hand demonstrated at 4 tesla. NeuroImage, 10(1), 55–62.
pubmed: 10385581
doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0448
pmcid: 10385581
Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7), 2–2.
doi: 10.1167/4.7.2
Meso, A. I., Rankin, J., Faugeras, O., Kornprobst, P., & Masson, G. S. (2016). The relative contribution of noise and adaptation to competition during tri-stable motion perception. Journal of Vision, 16(15), 6–6.
pubmed: 27936270
doi: 10.1167/16.15.6
pmcid: 27936270
Moreno-Bote, R., Shpiro, A., Rinzel, J., & Rubin, N. (2010). Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Journal of Vision, 10(11), 1–1.
pubmed: 20884496
doi: 10.1167/10.11.1
pmcid: 20884496
Nihashi, T., Naganawa, S., Sato, C., Kawai, H., Nakamura, T., Fukatsu, H., ..., Aoki, I. (2005). Contralateral and ipsilateral responses in primary somatosensory cortex following electrical median nerve stimulation—an fMRI study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(4), 842–848.
pubmed: 15792893
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.10.011
pmcid: 15792893
Noachtar, S., Lüders, H.O., Dinner, D. S., & Klem, G. (1997). Ipsilateral median somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from human somatosensory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 104(3), 189–198.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00013-0
Pressnitzer, D., & Hupé, J.-M. (2006). Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current biology, 16(13), 1351–1357.
pubmed: 16824924
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.054
pmcid: 16824924
Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1983). Perceptual organization in moving patterns. Nature, 304(5926), 529–531.
pubmed: 6877373
doi: 10.1038/304529a0
pmcid: 6877373
Rankin, J., Sussman, E., & Rinzel, J. (2015). Neuromechanistic model of auditory bistability. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(11), e1004555.
pubmed: 26562507
pmcid: 4642990
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004555
Romo, R., & Salinas, E. (2003). Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 203–218.
pubmed: 12612633
doi: 10.1038/nrn1058
pmcid: 12612633
Saal, H. P., Wang, X., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2016). Importance of spike timing in touch: an analogy with hearing?. Current Opinion In Neurobiology, 40, 142–149.
pubmed: 27504741
pmcid: 5315566
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.07.013
Schnitzler, A., Salmelin, R., Salenius, S., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (1995). Tactile information from the human hand reaches the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 200(1), 25–28.
pubmed: 8584258
doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)12065-C
pmcid: 8584258
Sherrick, C. E., & Rogers, R. (1966). Apparent haptic movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 1 (3), 175–180.
doi: 10.3758/BF03210054
Sherrick, C. E. (1968). Bilateral apparent haptic movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 4(3), 159–160.
doi: 10.3758/BF03210458
Sterzer, P., Kleinschmidt, A., & Rees, G. (2009). The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 310–318.
pubmed: 19540794
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.006
pmcid: 19540794
Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith, I., Kornhuber, H. H., & Mountcastle, V. B. (1968). The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. Journal of Neurophysiology, 31(2), 301–334.
pubmed: 4972033
doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.2.301
pmcid: 4972033
Tommerdahl, M., Hester, K. D., Felix, E. R., Hollins, M., Favorov, O. V., Quibrera, P. M., & Whitsel, B. L. (2005). Human vibrotactile frequency discriminative capacity after adaptation to 25-Hz or 200-Hz stimulation. Brain Research, 1057(1-2), 1– 9.
pubmed: 16140284
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.04.031
pmcid: 16140284
Toppino, T. C. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(8), 1285–1295.
doi: 10.3758/BF03194852
Van Ee, R., Noest, A. J., Brascamp, J. W., & van den Berg, A. V. (2006). Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference. Vision research, 46(19), 3129–3141.
pubmed: 16650452
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.017
pmcid: 16650452
van Ee, R. (2009). Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. JOSA A, 26(12), 2612– 2622.
pubmed: 19956332
doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612
pmcid: 19956332
Wilson, H. R. (2003a). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(24), 14499–14503.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2333622100
Wilson, H. R. (2003b). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(24), 14499–14503.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2333622100
Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Resolving perceptual ambiguity. Nature, 380(6575), 587–588.
pubmed: 8602257
doi: 10.1038/380587a0
pmcid: 8602257
Wuerger, S., Shapley, R., & Rubin, N. (1996). “On the visually perceived direction of motion”? by Hans Wallach: 60 years later. Perception, 25(11), 1317–1367.
doi: 10.1068/p251317
Yau, J. M., Olenczak, J. B., Dammann, J. F., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2009). Temporal frequency channels are linked across audition and touch. Current Biology, 19(7), 561–566.
pubmed: 19268591
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.013
pmcid: 19268591
Zhou, Y. H., Gao, J. B., White, K. D., Merk, I., & Yao, K. (2004). Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biological Cybernetics, 90(4), 256–263.
pubmed: 15085344
doi: 10.1007/s00422-004-0472-8
pmcid: 15085344
Zhou, W., & Chen, D. (2009). Binaral rivalry between the nostrils and in the cortex. Current Biology, 19(18), 1561–1565.
pubmed: 19699095
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.052
pmcid: 19699095