Comparisons of PNEC derivation logic flows under example regulatory schemes and implications for ecoTTC.


Journal

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 31 01 2021
revised: 07 04 2021
accepted: 12 04 2021
pubmed: 24 4 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 23 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Derivation of Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs) for aquatic systems is the primary deterministic form of hazard extrapolation used in environmental risk assessment. Depending on the data availability, different regulatory jurisdictions apply application factors (AFs) to the most sensitive measured endpoint to derive the PNEC for a chemical. To assess differences in estimated PNEC values, two PNEC determination methodologies were applied to a curated public database using the EnviroTox Platform (www.EnviroToxdatabase.org). PNECs were derived for 3647 compounds using derivation procedures based on example US EPA and a modified European Union chemical registration procedure to allow for comparisons. Ranked probability distributions of PNEC values were developed and 5th percentile values were calculated for the entire dataset and scenarios where full acute or full chronic data sets were available. The lowest PNEC values indicated categorization based on chemical attributes and modes of action would lead to improved extrapolations. Full acute or chronic datasets gave measurably higher 5th percentile PNEC values. Algae were under-represented in available ecotoxicity data but drove PNECs disproportionately. Including algal inhibition studies will be important in understanding chemical hazards. The PNEC derivation logic flows are embedded in the EnviroTox Platform providing transparent and consistent PNEC derivations and PNEC distribution calculations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33891999
pii: S0273-2300(21)00073-8
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104933
pmc: PMC10461128
mid: NIHMS1925143
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hazardous Substances 0
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104933

Subventions

Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Jan;10(1):30-6
pubmed: 23913910
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):652-663
pubmed: 27599457
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1995;3(3):179-201
pubmed: 8564854
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Aug;30(8):1943-54
pubmed: 21590796
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Oct;38(10):2294-2304
pubmed: 31269286
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):640-651
pubmed: 27869364
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Jul;38(7):1526-1541
pubmed: 30994956
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):664-674
pubmed: 27531323
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Jul;38(7):1514-1525
pubmed: 30994946
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 May;38(5):1062-1073
pubmed: 30714190
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Mar;38(3):671-681
pubmed: 30615221
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007 Sep;26(9):2019-23
pubmed: 17705662
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Dec;22(12):3031-6
pubmed: 14713046
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 May;35(5):1201-12
pubmed: 26403382
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Aug;32(8):1768-83
pubmed: 23606235
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133510
pubmed: 31357034
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Sep 5;51(17):10203-10211
pubmed: 28759717
Food Chem Toxicol. 2004 Jan;42(1):65-83
pubmed: 14630131
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2015 Jun;34(6):1436-42
pubmed: 25728797
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2015 Dec;34(12):2864-9
pubmed: 26111584
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):573-579
pubmed: 28383801
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;42(2):218-24
pubmed: 15949882
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;69(3):496-511
pubmed: 24874798

Auteurs

S E Belanger (SE)

The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: sebelang@fuse.net.

A Beasley (A)

The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA. Electronic address: abeasley@dow.com.

J L Brill (JL)

The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: brill.jl@g.com.

J Krailler (J)

The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: krailler.j@pg.com.

K A Connors (KA)

The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: connors.ka@pg.com.

G J Carr (GJ)

The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: carr.gj@pg.com.

M Embry (M)

Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: membry@hesiglobal.com.

M G Barron (MG)

U.S. EPA, Office of Research & Development, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA. Electronic address: Barron.Mace@epa.gov.

R Otter (R)

The Data Science Institute, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, USA. Electronic address: ryan.otter@mtsu.edu.

A Kienzler (A)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: aude.kienzler@efsa.europa.eu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH