National disparities in colorectal cancer screening in patients with comorbid conditions: an analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.


Journal

Journal of osteopathic medicine
ISSN: 2702-3648
Titre abrégé: J Osteopath Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101776472

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 04 2021
Historique:
received: 23 02 2021
accepted: 29 03 2021
pubmed: 24 4 2021
medline: 3 11 2021
entrez: 23 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Each year, approximately 53,200 people die in the U.S. from colorectal cancer (CRC), indicating a need to increase screening efforts. Some studies have suggested mammography use is higher in patients with comorbid conditions, a reflection of increased follow up. Another study found that patients with obesity were less likely to be screened for CRC than nonobese patients. However, no study has assessed the impact of multiple comorbidities on CRC screening. To analyze CRC screening rates in patients with comorbidities compared with healthy patients, and to assess whether the number of comorbid diagnoses impacted screening rates. A cross sectional analysis of patients who received CRC screening was performed using the 2018 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Respondents were classified as having had CRC screening if they answered "yes" to either of the following: "Have you ever had a blood stool test?" or "Have you ever had a sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy?" Respondents younger than age 50 were excluded. A weighted multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to determine adjusted risk ratios (ARR). Confidence intervals (CI) were reported at 95%. We identified 279,784 respondents who met inclusion criteria. Of those, 79.7% (sample n=222,879; population N=46,304,360) of respondents had received CRC screening. Patients with diabetes, hypertension, skin cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), arthritis, depression, and chronic kidney disease were significantly more likely to be screened than those without comorbidities. There was no statistically significant difference in screening rates between patients with and without cardiovascular disease. Compared with patients with zero comorbidities, those with one were significantly more likely to receive screening (ARR, 1.11; CI, 1.09-1.12) as were those with two to four (ARR, 1.2; CI, 1.18-1.22). Patients with five or more comorbidities were significantly less likely to be screened than those with two to four (ARR, 1.12; CI, 1.1-1.14). Patients with one or more comorbidities were more likely to be screened than those without comorbidities, but those with five or more conditions were less likely to be screened than patients with two to four conditions. This indicates that physicians may be more fatigued and less likely to recommend CRC screening to patients with many comorbidities compared with patients diagnosed with only a few conditions. The results of this study add to the literature by identifying an interaction between the number of comorbidities and likelihood of being screened for CRC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33892528
pii: jom-2021-0066
doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0066
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

657-662

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Benjamin Greiner et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Références

Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, Goding Sauer, A, Fedewa, SA, Butterly, LF, Anderson, JC, et al.. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J Clin 2020;70:145–64. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21601.
Levin, TR, Corley, DA, Jensen, CD, Schottinger, JE, Quinn, VP, Zauber, AG, et al.. Effects of organized colorectal cancer screening on cancer incidence and mortality in a large community-based population. Gastroenterology 2018;155:1383–91. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017.
Sharp, L, O’Leary, E, O’Ceilleachair, A, Skally, M, Hanly, P. Financial impact of colorectal cancer and its consequences: associations between cancer-related financial stress and strain and health-related quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 2018;61:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000923.
Gesink, D, Filsinger, B, Mihic, A, Norwood, TA, Racey, CS, Perez, D, et al.. Cancer screening barriers and facilitators for under and never screened populations: a mixed methods study. Cancer Epidemiol 2016;45:126–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.10.015.
Yasmeen, S, Xing, G, Morris, C, Chlebowski, RT, Romano, PS. Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer 2011;117:3252–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25857.
Gawron, AJ, Staub, J, Bielefeldt, K. Impact of health insurance, poverty, and comorbidities on colorectal cancer screening: insights from the medical expenditure panel survey. Dig Dis Sci 2021;66:70–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06541-7.
Seibert, RG, Hanchate, AD, Berz, JP, Schroy, PC3rd. National disparities in colorectal cancer screening among obese adults. Am J Prev Med 2017;53:e41–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.006.
Norton, EC, Miller, MM, Kleinman, LC. Computing adjusted risk ratios and risk differences in Stata. STATA J 2013;13:492–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1301300304.
Font, A, Corti, V, Berger, R. Burnout in healthcare professionals in oncology. Procedia Econ Finance 2015;23:228–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00320-2.
Sablik, Z, Samborska-Sablik, A, Drożdż, J. Universality of physicians’ burnout syndrome as a result of experiencing difficulty in relationship with patients. Arch Med Sci 2013;9:398–403. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.28658.
Halbesleben, JRB, Rathert, C. Linking physician burnout and patient outcomes: exploring the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients. Health Care Manag Rev 2008;33:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HMR.0000304493.87898.72.
Radecki, SE, Kane, RL, Solomon, DH, Mendenhall, RC, Beck, JC. Do physicians spend less time with older patients? J Am Geriatr Soc 1988;36:713–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb07173.x.
Østbye, T, Yarnall, KSH, Krause, KM, Pollak, KI, Gradison, M, Lloyd Michener, J. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 2005;3:209–14. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.310.
Hebl, MR, Xu, J. Weighing the care: physicians’ reactions to the size of a patient. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1246–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801681.
White, P, Kenton, K. Use of electronic medical record-based tools to improve compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines: effect of an educational intervention on physicians’ practice patterns. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182607137.
Kim, SE, Pérez-Stable, EJ, Wong, S, Gregorich, S, Sawaya, GF, Walsh, JM, et al.. Association between cancer risk perception and screening behavior among diverse women. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:728–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.7.728.
Hadjipetrou, A, Anyfantakis, D, Galanakis, CG, Kastanakis, M, Kastanakis, S. Colorectal cancer, screening and primary care: a mini literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23:6049–58. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i33.6049.
Cossu, G, Saba, L, Minerba, L, Mascalchi, M. Colorectal cancer screening: the role of psychological, social and background factors in decision-making process. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2018;14:63. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010063.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. J Am Med Assoc 2016;315:2564–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
Wolf, AMD, Fontham, ETH, Church, TR, Flowers, CR, Guerra, CE, LaMonte, SJ, et al.. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA A Cancer J Clin 2018;68:250–81. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21457.
Rex, DK, Richard Boland, C, Dominitz, JA, Francis, MG, David, AJ, Tonya, K, et al.. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.003.
Araghi, M, Soerjomataram, I, Bardot, A, Ferlay, J, Cabasag, CJ, Morrison, DS, et al.. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence in seven high-income countries: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:511–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30147-5.

Auteurs

Benjamin Greiner (B)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Ronak Gandhi (R)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Robinder Abrol (R)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Milee Patel (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Micah Hartwell (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH