Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 04 2021
23 04 2021
Historique:
received:
29
09
2020
accepted:
09
04
2021
entrez:
24
4
2021
pubmed:
25
4
2021
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brucellosis, caused by several species of the genus Brucella, is a zoonotic disease that affects humans and animal species worldwide. Information on the Brucella species circulating in different hosts in Kenya is largely unknown, thus limiting the adoption of targeted control strategies. This study was conducted in multi-host livestock populations in Kenya to detect the circulating Brucella species and assess evidence of host-pathogen associations. Serum samples were collected from 228 cattle, 162 goats, 158 sheep, 49 camels, and 257 humans from Narok and Marsabit counties in Kenya. Information on age, location and history of abortion or retained placenta were obtained for sampled livestock. Data on age, gender and location of residence were also collected for human participants. All samples were tested using genus level real-time PCR assays with primers specific for IS711 and bcsp31 targets for the detection of Brucella. All genus positive samples (positive for both targets) were further tested with a speciation assay for AlkB and BMEI1162 targets, specific for B. abortus and B. melitensis, respectively. Samples with adequate quantities aggregating to 577 were also tested with the Rose Bengal Test (RBT). A total of 199 (33.3%) livestock and 99 (38.5%) human samples tested positive for genus Brucella. Animal Brucella PCR positive status was positively predicted by RBT positive results (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 4.0-17.1). Humans aged 21-40 years had higher odds (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-6.6) of being Brucella PCR positive compared to the other age categories. The data on detection of different Brucella species indicates that B. abortus was detected more often in cattle (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.6) and camels (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.3), while B. melitensis was detected more in sheep (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 2.0-6.7) and goats (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-3.1). Both B. abortus and B. melitensis DNA were detected in humans and in multiple livestock host species, suggesting cross-transmission of these species among the different hosts. The detection of these two zoonotic Brucella species in humans further underpins the importance of One Health prevention strategies that target multiple host species, especially in the multi-host livestock populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33893352
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88327-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-88327-z
pmc: PMC8065124
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8881Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/L019019/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 107753/A/15/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 17;13(10):e0007506
pubmed: 31622339
Trop Geogr Med. 1976 Mar;28(1):45-33
pubmed: 941242
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2016;44(6):701-713
pubmed: 28018023
Parasitology. 2016 Jun;143(7):821-834
pubmed: 26935267
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Mar;170:105858
pubmed: 32014437
BMC Microbiol. 2019 May 24;19(1):108
pubmed: 31126230
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 27;10(1):7081
pubmed: 32341414
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Apr 1;14(4):e0008108
pubmed: 32236091
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 9;20(1):26
pubmed: 31918671
BMC Vet Res. 2020 May 11;16(1):133
pubmed: 32393374
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Aug;93(2):224-231
pubmed: 26101275
Harefuah. 1976 Dec 1;91(11):408-9
pubmed: 1017740
Trans GIS. 2020 Oct;24(5):1147-1164
pubmed: 33281493
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Mar;42(3):1290-3
pubmed: 15004098
Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Jan;139(1):149-56
pubmed: 20447329
Afr Health Sci. 2018 Mar;18(1):22-28
pubmed: 29977253
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1159-65
pubmed: 8051240
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;36(3):241-8
pubmed: 23044181
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jan;17(1):34-43
pubmed: 20132255
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 1;159:203-210
pubmed: 30314783
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):853
pubmed: 27549329
Agric Syst. 2018 Nov;167:47-60
pubmed: 30739979
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Jan 27;140(3-4):392-8
pubmed: 19604656
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(11):1464-70
pubmed: 17970716
Vet Res Commun. 1989;13(6):403-6
pubmed: 2517155
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15465
pubmed: 30337685
Vet Microbiol. 2007 Nov 15;125(1-2):187-92
pubmed: 17590540
Clin Lab. 2004;50(7-8):387-94
pubmed: 15330505
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Dec;48(8):1711-1718
pubmed: 27677292
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Apr;39(4):1661-4
pubmed: 11283112
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Jul 21;11:156
pubmed: 26195218
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012 Jan;44(1):17-20
pubmed: 21660647
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:720413
pubmed: 25793204
Infect Dis Poverty. 2015 Dec 22;4:57
pubmed: 26690090
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2017 Feb 28;88(0):e1-e7
pubmed: 28281771
Ecohealth. 2019 Dec;16(4):712-725
pubmed: 31728795
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Jan;49(1):1-11
pubmed: 27628065
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;22(12):2160-2164
pubmed: 27662463
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jun 30;8:1232
pubmed: 28713359
Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):111-34
pubmed: 12414138
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Aug 08;11:189
pubmed: 26253151
Clin Lab. 2003;49(9-10):487-505
pubmed: 14572205
Br Vet J. 1972 Dec;128(12):642-51
pubmed: 4647703
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Nov 1;102(2):118-31
pubmed: 21571380