Changes of microorganism composition in fresh and stored bee pollen from Southern Germany.

Bee pollen Microorganism composition Pollen quality Pollen spoilage

Journal

Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 22 12 2020
accepted: 09 04 2021
pubmed: 25 4 2021
medline: 27 8 2021
entrez: 24 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Analysis of plant pollen can provide valuable insights into the existing spectrum of microorganisms in the environment. When harvesting bee-collected pollen as a dietary supplement for human consumption, timely preservation of the freshly collected pollen is fundamental for product quality. Environmental microorganisms contained in freshly collected pollen can lead to spoilage by degradation of pollen components. In this study, freshly collected bee pollen was sampled at different locations and stored under various storage conditions to examine the hypothesis that storage conditions may have an effect on the composition of microorganisms in pollen samples. The samples were analyzed using 16S and 18S amplicon sequencing and characterized by palynological analysis. Interestingly, the bacterial communities between pollen samples from different locations varied only slightly, whereas for fungal community compositions, this effect was substantially increased. Further, we noticed that fungal communities in pollen are particularly sensitive to storage conditions. The fungal genera proportion Cladosporium and Mycosphaerella decreased, while Zygosaccharomyces and Aspergillus increased during storage. Aspergillus and Zygosaccharomyces fractions increased during storage at 30 °C, which could negatively impact the pollen quality if it is used as a dietary supplement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33893577
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13932-4
pii: 10.1007/s11356-021-13932-4
pmc: PMC8692275
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

47251-47261

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Mar;75(6):1589-96
pubmed: 19151179
Mol Ecol. 2014 Dec;23(23):5904-17
pubmed: 25319366
Stud Mycol. 2006;55:99-131
pubmed: 18490974
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8
pubmed: 8180733
Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr 16;8(10):4743-4756
pubmed: 29876054
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2013;4:57-78
pubmed: 23215631
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230871
pubmed: 32275718
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Mar 10;114(2):234-42
pubmed: 17239464
Plant Dis. 2012 Dec;96(12):1824
pubmed: 30727296
Genome Announc. 2018 May 17;6(20):
pubmed: 29773615
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e83125
pubmed: 24358254
Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(9):11173-87
pubmed: 23109845
Microorganisms. 2020 Feb 15;8(2):
pubmed: 32075309
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan 7;41(1):e1
pubmed: 22933715
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016 Jun;14(6):374-84
pubmed: 27140688
Stud Mycol. 2007;58:157-83
pubmed: 18490999
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 23;6:33721
pubmed: 27659943
Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 14;8(11):
pubmed: 33202620
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Aug;54(2):183-91
pubmed: 12782374
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e95056
pubmed: 24740297
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):22789-22803
pubmed: 33432407
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):2019
pubmed: 29386588
J Microbiol. 2014 Aug;52(8):639-45
pubmed: 25098562
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999 Jul-Aug;46(4):327-38
pubmed: 10461381
J Insect Physiol. 2014 Oct;69:65-73
pubmed: 25038311
Molecules. 2012 Jul 11;17(7):8359-77
pubmed: 22785265
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Nov 15;105(1):1-9
pubmed: 16009441
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Jan;63:233-9
pubmed: 24262487
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 09;9:3238
pubmed: 30687253
Nutrients. 2015 Mar 11;7(3):1787-97
pubmed: 25768950
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012 Feb;4(1):97-104
pubmed: 23757235
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0183208
pubmed: 28934240
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Feb;26(2):232-237
pubmed: 31485159
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Nov;63(Pt 11):4259-4265
pubmed: 23832968
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Mar 14;169(3-4):203-10
pubmed: 24485932
Int J Microbiol. 2014;2014:758942
pubmed: 25332721
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009 Jul;22(3):447-65
pubmed: 19597008
J Environ Sci Health B. 2016;51(3):176-81
pubmed: 26674447
Molecules. 2015 Jul 09;20(7):12525-44
pubmed: 26184138
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Aug 18;185:167-76
pubmed: 24997272
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015 Nov;61(5):477-83
pubmed: 26280091

Auteurs

Carolin Friedle (C)

Apicultural State Institute, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. carolin_friedle@uni-hohenheim.de.
Institute of Animal Science, Department of Livestock Population Genomics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. carolin_friedle@uni-hohenheim.de.

Paul D'Alvise (P)

Institute of Animal Science, Department of Livestock Population Genomics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Karsten Schweikert (K)

Core Facility Hohenheim and Institute of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Klaus Wallner (K)

Apicultural State Institute, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Martin Hasselmann (M)

Institute of Animal Science, Department of Livestock Population Genomics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH