Risk perception of climate change and natural hazards in global mountain regions: A critical review.

Climate risk reduction Mountain hazard processes Mountain risks Risk awareness Risk perception drivers

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 01 11 2020
revised: 29 03 2021
accepted: 31 03 2021
pubmed: 26 4 2021
medline: 26 4 2021
entrez: 25 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Mountains are highly sensitive to climate change. Their elevated areas provide essential ecosystem services both for the surrounding mountainous regions and particularly for adjacent lowlands. Impacts of a warmer climate affect these services and have negative consequences on the supply of water, on biodiversity and on protection from natural hazards. Mountain social-ecological systems are affected by these changes, which also influence communities' risk perception and responses to changing climate conditions. Therefore, to understand individual and societal responses to climate change in mountain areas, aspects and drivers of risk perception need to be scrutinised. This article presents the findings of a literature review of recent English language publications on risk perception in connection to climate change and related natural hazards in mountain regions worldwide. Studies were selected from recorded entries in JSTOR, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science covering the period 2000-2019 and analysed in two steps (structured exploratory analysis, n = 249 and in-depth analysis, n = 72) with respect to the studies' research question, methodology, geographical scope and risk perception drivers. The review reveals that socio-demographic factors, like gender, age and personal experiences, have a crucial impact on individual risk perception. Some of the less tangible but nevertheless decisive factors are important in mountain regions such as place attachment and socio-cultural practices. In conclusion, there is however little information in the literature which addresses the specific situation of risk perception in mountain areas and its influence on communities' responses to environmental changes. Further, we observed a strong gap concerning the integration of indigenous knowledge in risk perception research. Many studies overlook or oversimplify local knowledge and the cultural dimensions of risk perception. Based on these results, the paper identifies several gaps in research and knowledge which may influence the design of climate risk management strategies as well as on their successful implementation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33895507
pii: S0048-9697(21)02027-1
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146957
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

146957

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Stefan Schneiderbauer (S)

United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany at Eurac Research, Centre for Global Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS), 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy; Department of Geography, Qwaqwa Campus, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa; Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy. Electronic address: schneiderbauer@ehs.unu.edu.

Paola Fontanella Pisa (P)

United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany at Eurac Research, Centre for Global Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS), 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy. Electronic address: fontanella.pisa@ehs.unu.edu.

Jess L Delves (JL)

United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany at Eurac Research, Centre for Global Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS), 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy. Electronic address: delves@ehs.unu.edu.

Lydia Pedoth (L)

United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany at Eurac Research, Centre for Global Mountain Safeguard Research (GLOMOS), 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy; Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy. Electronic address: lydia.pedoth@eurac.edu.

Samuel Rufat (S)

Department of Geography, CY Cergy Paris University, 33 Boulevard du Port, 95000 Cergy, France; Institut Universitaire de France, 1 rue Descartes, 75231 Paris, France. Electronic address: samuel.rufat@u-cergy.fr.

Marlene Erschbamer (M)

Institute for Indology and Tibetan Studies, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Ludwigstraße 31, 80539 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: marlene@erschbamer.net.

Thomas Thaler (T)

Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: thomas.thaler@boku.ac.at.

Fabio Carnelli (F)

Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, 1 Viale Druso, Bolzano 39100, Italy. Electronic address: fabio.carnelli@eurac.edu.

Sergio Granados-Chahin (S)

Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, Calle Camilo José Cela, s/n, 41018 Sevilla, Spain. Electronic address: sgranados@master.upeace.org.

Classifications MeSH