Uniportal video-assisted versus open pneumonectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis with short-term outcomes.
Lung cancer
Minimally invasive
Pneumonectomy
Uniportal
Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)
Journal
General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1863-6713
Titre abrégé: Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101303952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
23
12
2020
accepted:
22
03
2021
pubmed:
26
4
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
entrez:
25
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Uniportal (U-VATS) pneumonectomy in lung cancer patients remains disputed in terms of oncological outcomes, and has not been compared to open approaches previously. We evaluated U-VATS versus open pneumonectomy at a high-volume centre. Patients undergoing pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups based on surgical approach. Propensity-score matching was performed (1:1), and intention-to-treat analysis applied. Overall survival, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital-stay and readmission, pain, time to adjuvant therapy, morbidity and mortality were tested. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. NC) RESULTS: 341 patients underwent pneumonectomy; 23 patients with small-cell lung cancer were excluded, thus 318 patients were submitted to surgery by either U-VATS (n = 54) or open (n = 264). After matching, 52 patients were selected from each group. Five patients (9.2%) in the uniportal group required conversion. There was no significant difference in intraoperative outcomes, complication rates, readmission rates or mortality. The U-VATS group experienced significantly shorter hospital stay (mean ± SD; 6.7 ± 2.7 vs 9.1 ± 2.3 days, p < 0.001) and reported less pain postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated sooner after U-VATS (38.1 ± 8.4 vs 50.8 ± 11.5 days, p < 0.0001). Overall survival appeared to be superior in U-VATS when pathology stage was aligned (p = 0.001). Uniportal VATS is a safe and effective alternative approach to open surgery for pneumonectomy in lung cancer. Complications and oncologic outcomes were comparatively similar. U-VATS showed lower postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and superior overall survival. The study is a preliminary analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33895938
doi: 10.1007/s11748-021-01626-0
pii: 10.1007/s11748-021-01626-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1291-1302Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Références
Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, et al. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:2008–16.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.009
Battoo A, Jahan A, Yang Z, et al. Thoracoscopic pneumonectomy: an 11-year experience. Chest. 2014;146:1300–9.
doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0058
Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:836–44.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X
Laursen LØ, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ, Jensen TK, Ravn J, Konge L. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer is associated with a lower 30-day morbidity compared with lobectomy by thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2016;49:870–5.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv205
Downey RJ, Cheng D, Kernstine K, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer resection: a consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2007. Innovations (Phila). 2007;2:293–302.
doi: 10.1097/imi.0b013e3181662c7f
Sebastian T, Kwon BS, Zhao L, et al. Evaluation of acute and chronic pain outcomes after robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or open anatomic pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:652–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.008
Halezeroğlu S. Advantages and disadvantages of single incision VATS in major anatomical resection for lung cancer. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:115.
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.07.15
Petersen RP, Pham D, Burfeind WR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1245–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.029
Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:419–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.026
Ng CSH, MacDonald JK, Gilbert S, et al. Optimal approach to lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: systemic review and meta-analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2019;14:90–116.
doi: 10.1177/1556984519837027
Craig SR, Walker WS. Initial experience of video assisted thoracoscopic pneumonectomy. Thorax. 1995;50:392–5.
doi: 10.1136/thx.50.4.392
Soultanis KM, Chen Chao M, Chen J, et al. Technique and outcomes of 79 consecutive uniportal video-assisted sleeve lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:876–82.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz162
Yang CJ, Yendamuri S, Mayne NR, et al. the role of thoracoscopic pneumonectomy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovascular Surg. 2019;158:252–64.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.001
Sahai RK, Nwogu CE, Yendamuri S, Tan W, Wilding GE, Demmy TL. Is thoracoscopic pneumonectomy safe? Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1086–92.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.065
Nwogu CE, Yendamuri S, Demmy TL. Does thoracoscopic pneumonectomy for lung cancer affect survival? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:S2102–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.019
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Delgado M, Fieira E, Mendez L, Fernandez R, de la Torre M. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic pneumonectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5(Suppl 3):S246–52.
pubmed: 24040532
pmcid: 3771625
Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007;132(3):161S-S177 (2nd edition).
doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1359
AdnanRaza AimanAlzetani. Principles of posterolateral thoracotomy and pneumonectomy. Cardiothoracic Surgery-II. 2017;35(5):274–80.
Wang L, Liu D, Lu J, Zhang S, Yang X. The feasibility and advantage of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary lobectomy. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:7.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-3014-6
Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K, et al. Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. JCO. 2006;24:4888–94.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6089
Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, Kong W, King WD, Booth CM. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305:2335–42.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.749
Wang BY, Huang JY, Hung WH, Lin CH, Lin SH, Liaw YP, Ko JL. Impact on survival on interval between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected stage IB-IIIA lung cancer. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0163809.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163809