Multisensory Integration in Stroke Patients: A Theoretical Approach to Reinterpret Upper-Limb Proprioceptive Deficits and Visual Compensation.
eye-hand coordination
maximum likelihood principle
multisensory integration
proprioception assessment
stroke
visual compensation
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
27
12
2020
accepted:
04
03
2021
entrez:
26
4
2021
pubmed:
27
4
2021
medline:
27
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For reaching and grasping, as well as for manipulating objects, optimal hand motor control arises from the integration of multiple sources of sensory information, such as proprioception and vision. For this reason, proprioceptive deficits often observed in stroke patients have a significant impact on the integrity of motor functions. The present targeted review attempts to reanalyze previous findings about proprioceptive upper-limb deficits in stroke patients, as well as their ability to compensate for these deficits using vision. Our theoretical approach is based on two concepts: first, the description of multi-sensory integration using statistical optimization models; second, on the insight that sensory information is not only encoded in the reference frame of origin (e.g., retinal and joint space for vision and proprioception, respectively), but also in higher-order sensory spaces. Combining these two concepts within a single framework appears to account for the heterogeneity of experimental findings reported in the literature. The present analysis suggests that functional upper limb post-stroke deficits could not only be due to an impairment of the proprioceptive system per se, but also due to deficiencies of cross-references processing; that is of the ability to encode proprioceptive information in a non-joint space. The distinction between purely proprioceptive or cross-reference-related deficits can account for two experimental observations: first, one and the same patient can perform differently depending on specific proprioceptive assessments; and a given behavioral assessment results in large variability across patients. The distinction between sensory and cross-reference deficits is also supported by a targeted literature review on the relation between cerebral structure and proprioceptive function. This theoretical framework has the potential to lead to a new stratification of patients with proprioceptive deficits, and may offer a novel approach to post-stroke rehabilitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33897359
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.646698
pmc: PMC8058201
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
646698Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Bernard-Espina, Beraneck, Maier and Tagliabue.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015 Aug;22(4):271-80
pubmed: 26258452
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Sep;33(9):740-750
pubmed: 31319755
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Apr;29(4):665-672
pubmed: 28533607
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975436
pubmed: 22275636
J Neurol Sci. 1999 Aug 1;167(1):45-9
pubmed: 10500261
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Apr;23(2):136-46
pubmed: 27078117
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):731-42
pubmed: 26719352
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:195-218
pubmed: 18558853
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):233-43
pubmed: 24997229
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Feb;24(2):178-87
pubmed: 19794134
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Oct 30;16(1):129
pubmed: 31666135
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 May/Jun;71(3):7103190070p1-7103190070p9
pubmed: 28422633
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Aug;22(8):758-67
pubmed: 18678576
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(4):361-71
pubmed: 23524843
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):18-30
pubmed: 27866116
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Apr;62(2):93-104
pubmed: 25615889
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1116-1123
pubmed: 30943883
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):1929-1944
pubmed: 29359521
Neurophysiol Clin. 2019 Apr;49(2):149-164
pubmed: 30391148
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Dec;232(12):3833-46
pubmed: 25146571
Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:245-259
pubmed: 30391879
J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 26;31(4):1397-409
pubmed: 21273424
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 19;370(1677):20140203
pubmed: 26240418
Front Neurol. 2015 Dec 03;6:248
pubmed: 26696951
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:121-126
pubmed: 31374617
PLoS One. 2007 Sep 26;2(9):e943
pubmed: 17895984
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Sep;111(2):253-61
pubmed: 8891655
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011 Aug;69(4):624-9
pubmed: 21877031
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):267-80
pubmed: 16896981
J Mot Behav. 2017 Jan-Feb;49(1):27-34
pubmed: 27726645
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Mar;21(3):165-77
pubmed: 14755836
Neuron. 2002 Jul 3;35(1):173-84
pubmed: 12123617
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:660-664
pubmed: 31374706
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep 1;118(3):1598-1608
pubmed: 28615330
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Oct 04;9:72
pubmed: 23035968
Cognition. 2002 Feb;83(1):B1-11
pubmed: 11814488
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:414-426
pubmed: 31710936
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Nov 1;40(16):4813-4826
pubmed: 31348604
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):15-32
pubmed: 19967391
Cortex. 2016 Jun;79:42-56
pubmed: 27085894
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Apr-Jun;7(2):140-9
pubmed: 24968378
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 Apr 11;34(4):571-86
pubmed: 27080070
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(23):1965-70
pubmed: 22506667
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:6961-4
pubmed: 25571597
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(13):2685-90
pubmed: 16504223
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 05;8:1037
pubmed: 25601833
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Apr 30;11:77
pubmed: 24885197
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):944-951
pubmed: 31906829
Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Jan 31;8:1
pubmed: 24550816
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3782-92
pubmed: 20934442
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 19;14(7):e0219738
pubmed: 31323056
Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:955-971
pubmed: 30312939
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;90(8):957-958
pubmed: 30455405
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 7;15(1):47
pubmed: 29880003
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Dec 07;4:221
pubmed: 21165177
Neuroscience. 2013 Sep 17;248:88-94
pubmed: 23732231
J Neurol Sci. 2000 Mar 15;174(2):152-4
pubmed: 10858088
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 May;34(5):403-416
pubmed: 32391744
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Aug;12(8):1056-61
pubmed: 19597495
Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;90(8):1176-84
pubmed: 20522675
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;30(1):102-19
pubmed: 17852587
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 30;13(3):e0195043
pubmed: 29601594
Brain. 2004 May;127(Pt 5):1035-46
pubmed: 14976070
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jul;220(2):179-89
pubmed: 22648204
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 05;8(7):e68438
pubmed: 23861903
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Mar 16;15(1):24
pubmed: 29548326
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(6):507-15
pubmed: 23474542
Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;94(9):1220-31
pubmed: 24764072
PM R. 2019 Aug;11(8):821-827
pubmed: 30844135
PLoS One. 2016 May 06;11(5):e0154792
pubmed: 27152853
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD006331
pubmed: 20556766
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 13;14(1):114
pubmed: 29132388
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 21;12(11):e0183257
pubmed: 29161264
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33
pubmed: 11807554
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 22;14(1):42
pubmed: 28532512