Understanding the Shift in the Microbiome of Composts That Are Optimized for a Better Fit-for-Purpose in Growing Media.
Biolog EcoPlates
compost
maturation
metabarcoding
microorganisms
optimization
phospholipid fatty acid
sustainable growing media
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
accepted:
15
03
2021
entrez:
26
4
2021
pubmed:
27
4
2021
medline:
27
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Three characteristics are considered key for optimal use of composts in growing media: maturity, pH and organic matter content. Maturation is a critical step in the processing of composts contributing to compost quality. Blending of composts with chopped heath biomass, sieving out the larger fraction of composts and acidification of composts by adding elemental sulfur may be used either to increase organic matter content or to reduce pH for a better fit in growing media. While several studies have shown the effectiveness of these treatments to improve the use of composts in growing media, the effect of these treatments on the compost microbiome has merely been assessed before. In the present study, five immature composts were allowed to mature, and were subsequently acidified, blended or sieved. Bacterial and fungal communities of the composts were characterized and quantified using 16S rRNA and ITS2 gene metabarcoding and phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Metabolic biodiversity and activity were analyzed using Biolog EcoPlates. Compost batch was shown to be more important than maturation or optimization treatments to determine the compost microbiome. Compost maturation increased microbial diversity and favored beneficial microorganisms, which may be positive for the use of composts in growing media. Blending of composts increased microbial diversity, metabolic diversity, and metabolic activity, which may have a positive effect in growing media. Blending may be used to modify the microbiome to a certain degree in order to optimize microbiological characteristics. Acidification caused a decrease in bacterial diversity and microbial activity, which may be negative for the use in growing media, although the changes are limited. Sieving had limited effect on the microbiome of composts. Because of the limited effect on the microbiome, sieving of composts may be used flexible to improve (bio)chemical characteristics. This is the first study to assess the effects of maturation and optimization treatments to either increase organic matter content or lower pH in composts on the compost microbiome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33897654
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.643679
pmc: PMC8059793
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
643679Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Pot, De Tender, Ommeslag, Delcour, Ceusters, Gorrens, Debode, Vandecasteele and Vancampenhout.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Oct 1;42(1):1-14
pubmed: 19709261
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D259-D264
pubmed: 30371820
Microb Ecol. 2009 May;57(4):611-23
pubmed: 19224270
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003 Jun 1;44(3):319-28
pubmed: 19719613
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Aug;57(8):2351-9
pubmed: 16348543
BMC Genomics. 2020 Oct 22;21(1):733
pubmed: 33092529
BMC Microbiol. 2010 Mar 29;10:94
pubmed: 20350306
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 18;19(10):
pubmed: 30340353
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1256688
pubmed: 25430773
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111444
pubmed: 33059323
Waste Manag. 2014 Mar;34(3):607-22
pubmed: 24373678
Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 22;7:2062
pubmed: 28066380
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan 7;41(1):e1
pubmed: 22933715
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Dec;82(3):666-77
pubmed: 22738186
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1159-64
pubmed: 22232669
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2019 Mar;32(3):351-363
pubmed: 30252617
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(1):127-37
pubmed: 12492933
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 30;11:1810
pubmed: 32849417
J Biotechnol. 2017 Nov 10;261:169-176
pubmed: 28648396
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 29;8:2022
pubmed: 29238353
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D643-8
pubmed: 24293649
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
J Appl Microbiol. 2000 Nov;89(5):768-77
pubmed: 11119150
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1999;37:427-446
pubmed: 11701830
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4434-46
pubmed: 22504815
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):478-86
pubmed: 22564542
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jan;59(1):177-85
pubmed: 17233750
Phytopathology. 2012 May;102(5):478-89
pubmed: 22352305
Bioresour Technol. 2002 Jun;83(2):81-7
pubmed: 12056495
Waste Manag Res. 2001 Jun;19(3):257-61
pubmed: 11699859