Experiment on endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection in pigs.
Balloon dilation
ESD
Esophageal stenosis
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 1435-5922
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9430794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
25
12
2020
accepted:
15
04
2021
pubmed:
27
4
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
26
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is effective for esophageal stenosis caused by ESD. However, an efficient EBD method has not been established. We, therefore, conducted EBD experiments on porcine esophageal stenosis models. Study 1: in dilation models (day 22 after ESD), the thickness of the outer muscle layer (as an index of the extension effect) and the area of muscle fiber bundle necrosis in the inner muscle layer (as an index of thermal damage) were evaluated. Study 2: in restenosis models (day 43 after ESD), the thickness of the fibrous plexus (as an index of restenosis) was evaluated. In total, 12 porcine models were created. Study 1: the thickness of the outer muscle layer was 1243 ± 322 μm in surrounding locations and it was 803 ± 145 μm beneath the laceration (p = 0.005). In cases of muscular layer injury, the area of necrosis was 15,500 ± 10400 μm Since thermal damage persists until the completion of stenosis, EBD in the initial stage should be carefully performed. An extension effect was observed only at the laceration site and it later returned to a status similar to that of surrounding locations. Additional intervention would be required for preventing restenosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is effective for esophageal stenosis caused by ESD. However, an efficient EBD method has not been established. We, therefore, conducted EBD experiments on porcine esophageal stenosis models.
METHODS
Study 1: in dilation models (day 22 after ESD), the thickness of the outer muscle layer (as an index of the extension effect) and the area of muscle fiber bundle necrosis in the inner muscle layer (as an index of thermal damage) were evaluated. Study 2: in restenosis models (day 43 after ESD), the thickness of the fibrous plexus (as an index of restenosis) was evaluated. In total, 12 porcine models were created.
RESULTS
Study 1: the thickness of the outer muscle layer was 1243 ± 322 μm in surrounding locations and it was 803 ± 145 μm beneath the laceration (p = 0.005). In cases of muscular layer injury, the area of necrosis was 15,500 ± 10400 μm
CONCLUSION
Since thermal damage persists until the completion of stenosis, EBD in the initial stage should be carefully performed. An extension effect was observed only at the laceration site and it later returned to a status similar to that of surrounding locations. Additional intervention would be required for preventing restenosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33899159
doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01791-2
pii: 10.1007/s00535-021-01791-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
527-536Références
Min YW, Lee H, Song BG, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:624–33.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2360
Berry MF. Esophageal cancer: staging system and guidelines for staging and treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S289–97.
pubmed: 24876933
pmcid: 4037413
Toyonaga T, Man-i M, East JE, et al. 1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1000–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2555-2
Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I, et al. Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:133–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3665-9
Kosaka T, Endo M, Toya Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:183–91.
doi: 10.1111/den.12099
Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:255–324.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.040
Oda I, Shimizu Y, Yoshio T, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection for intramucosal esophageal squamous cell cancer: a secondary analysis of the Japan Esophageal Cohort study. Endoscopy. 2020;52:967–75.
doi: 10.1055/a-1185-9329
Ishihara R, Tanaka H, Iishi H, et al. Long-term outcome of esophageal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma without lymphovascular involvement after endoscopic resection. Cancer. 2008;112:2166–72.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.23418
Katada C, Muto M, Momma K, et al. Clinical outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae–a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy. 2007;39:779–83.
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966761
Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2012. Esophagus. 2019;16:221–45.
doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00674-z
Iizuka H, Kakizaki S, Sohara N, et al. Stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and adenomas. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:282–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01008.x
Ohara Y, Toyonaga T, Tanaka S, et al. Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large rectal neoplasms. Endoscopy. 2016;48:62–70.
pubmed: 26220284
Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, et al. Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms. Endoscopy. 2009;41:661–5.
doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214867
Miwata T, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Risk factors for esophageal stenosis after entire circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4049–56.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4719-3
Kadota T, Yano T, Kato T, et al. Prophylactic steroid administration for strictures after endoscopic resection of large superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E1267–74.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118291
Sato H, Inoue H, Kobayashi Y, et al. Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:250–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.008
Ezoe Y, Muto M, Horimatsu T, et al. Efficacy of preventive endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:222–7.
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181f39f4e
Hanaoka N, Ishihara R, Takeuchi Y, et al. Intralesional steroid injection to prevent stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer: a controlled prospective study. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1007–11.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310107
Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Nakayama T, et al. Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1115–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.005
Yu JP, Liu YJ, Tao YL, et al. Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2015;39:2955–64.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3193-3
Hashimoto S, Kobayashi M, Takeuchi M, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic triamcinolone injection for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1389–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.070
Nagami Y, Ominami M, Shiba M, et al. Prediction of esophageal stricture in patients given locoregional triamcinolone injections immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:198–205.
doi: 10.1111/den.12946
Nagami Y, Shiba M, Ominami M, et al. Single locoregional triamcinolone injection immediately after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection prevents stricture formation. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8:e75.
doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.5
Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Okahara S, et al. Risk of perforation during dilation for esophageal strictures after endoscopic resection in patients with early squamous cell carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2011;43:184–9.
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256109
Takeuchi M, Hashimoto S, Kobayashi M, et al. Prevention of subsequent stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2011;53:3064–72.
Oda I, Abe S, Nonaka S, et al. Practical tips for endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2016;58:1250–8.
Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, Elizabeth A Montgomery. Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam : Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.
Honda M, Nakamura T, Hori Y, et al. Process of healing of mucosal defects in the esophagus after endoscopic mucosal resection: histological evaluation in a dog model. Endoscopy. 2010;42:1092–5.
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255741
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
Kishida Y, Kakushima N, Kawata N, et al. Complications of endoscopic dilation for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2953–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4028-2
Hordijk ML, van Hooft JE, Hansen BE, et al. A randomized comparison of electrocautery incision with Savary bougienage for relief of anastomotic gastroesophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:849–55.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.02.023
Liu D, Tan Y, Wang Y, et al. Endoscopic incision with esophageal stent placement for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1036–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.037
Hanaoka N, Ishihara R, Motoori M, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation followed by intralesional steroid injection for anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1468–74.
doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0253-y