Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.


Journal

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
ISSN: 1558-9102
Titre abrégé: J Speech Lang Hear Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9705610

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 06 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 27 4 2021
medline: 6 7 2021
entrez: 26 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Purpose Individuals with cerebellar ataxia (CA) caused by cerebellar degeneration exhibit larger reactive compensatory responses to unexpected auditory feedback perturbations than neurobiologically typical speakers, suggesting they may rely more on feedback control during speech. We test this hypothesis by examining variability in unaltered speech. Previous studies of typical speakers have demonstrated a reduction in formant variability (centering) observed during the initial phase of vowel production from vowel onset to vowel midpoint. Centering is hypothesized to reflect feedback-based corrections for self-produced variability and thus may provide a behavioral assay of feedback control in unperturbed speech in the same manner as the compensatory response does for feedback perturbations. Method To comprehensively compare centering in individuals with CA and controls, we examine centering in two vowels (/i/ and /ɛ/) under two contexts (isolated words and connected speech). As a control, we examine speech produced both with and without noise to mask auditory feedback. Results Individuals with CA do not show increased centering compared to age-matched controls, regardless of vowel, context, or masking. Contrary to previous results in neurobiologically typical speakers, centering was not affected by the presence of masking noise in either group. Conclusions The similar magnitude of centering seen with and without masking noise questions whether centering is driven by auditory feedback. However, if centering is at least partially driven by auditory/somatosensory feedback, these results indicate that the larger compensatory response to altered auditory feedback observed in individuals with CA may not reflect typical motor control processes during normal, unaltered speech production.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33900786
doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00270
pmc: PMC8740698
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2234-2247

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC017091
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC017696
Pays : United States

Références

Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 19;12:510
pubmed: 30618687
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Oct;43(5):1275-89
pubmed: 11063247
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(4):411-8
pubmed: 12355269
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 10;60(6):1545-1550
pubmed: 28590007
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov;20(6):659-668
pubmed: 30348017
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):134-47
pubmed: 21975446
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Apr;45(2):295-310
pubmed: 12003512
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35
pubmed: 12404008
Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1213-6
pubmed: 9469813
Brain Res. 2016 Sep 1;1646:269-277
pubmed: 27288701
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Apr;37(4):1474-85
pubmed: 26917046
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Apr;76:96-105
pubmed: 30710834
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):1246-51
pubmed: 11008824
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;37(38):9249-9258
pubmed: 28842410
Elife. 2020 Oct 07;9:
pubmed: 33025903
Phonetica. 1981;37(5-6):306-26
pubmed: 7280033
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):384-90
pubmed: 19173425
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Oct 25;5:82
pubmed: 22046152
Brain. 1998 Feb;121 ( Pt 2):357-72
pubmed: 9549511
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Apr;51(4):705-23
pubmed: 6716120
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16340
pubmed: 30397215
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:525-35
pubmed: 24076223
J Neurophysiol. 2005 May;93(5):2809-21
pubmed: 15625094
J Speech Disord. 1949 Dec;14(4):363-8
pubmed: 15408239
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;33(2):379-388
pubmed: 28731508
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2000 Jan-Jun;52(1-3):48-53
pubmed: 10474004
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Oct 16;63(10):3392-3407
pubmed: 32976078
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2):
pubmed: 28256029
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):359-81
pubmed: 18251019
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):1103-13
pubmed: 19206885
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(4):1164-73
pubmed: 23197450
J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 6;26(36):9107-16
pubmed: 16957067
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 14;29(41):12930-9
pubmed: 19828807
Neuroscience. 2020 Dec 15;451:1-21
pubmed: 33091464
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Nov 1;40(16):4748-4758
pubmed: 31365181
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 9;33(41):16110-6
pubmed: 24107944
J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 4;32(27):9351-8
pubmed: 22764242
Mov Disord. 2013 Oct;28(12):1668-74
pubmed: 23861349
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 29;62(8S):2963-2985
pubmed: 31465712
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Sep;84(3):917-28
pubmed: 3183209
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Dec;10(6):812-32
pubmed: 6239907
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jul;51(4):430-41
pubmed: 26914169
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):966-77
pubmed: 16938984
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 26;13(1):e0191839
pubmed: 29373589
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2653-8
pubmed: 23345447
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):655-64
pubmed: 19019979
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2288-97
pubmed: 16642842
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997;49(2):63-82
pubmed: 9197089
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jul 15;28(2S):915-924
pubmed: 31306597
Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1183-98
pubmed: 8813282
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41830
pubmed: 22911857
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1429-43
pubmed: 18035557
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Jul;5(7):532-46
pubmed: 15208695
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Feb;89(2):859-66
pubmed: 2016436
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1125-38
pubmed: 12495520
J Neurophysiol. 1985 Aug;54(2):418-32
pubmed: 4031995
Cerebellum. 2007;6(1):58-65
pubmed: 17366266
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Sep;92(3):1284-300
pubmed: 1401516
Nature. 2003 Jun 19;423(6942):866-9
pubmed: 12815431
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Dec;37(12):4248-4261
pubmed: 27400999
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2000 Sep-Oct;52(5):228-38
pubmed: 10965176
J Neurol Sci. 1997 Feb 12;145(2):205-11
pubmed: 9094050
Lang Cogn Process. 2011 Jan 1;26(7):952-981
pubmed: 23667281
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Sep 3;15(9):e1007321
pubmed: 31479444
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 May;145(5):EL372
pubmed: 31153297
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Mar;145(3):1456
pubmed: 31067944
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):54-62
pubmed: 17507504

Auteurs

Benjamin Parrell (B)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Richard B Ivry (RB)

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

Srikantan S Nagarajan (SS)

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco.

John F Houde (JF)

Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH