Multi-Phase Multiple Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Enhancement Patterns and Morphological Features of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of 67 Cases.
Journal
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research
ISSN: 1643-3750
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9609063
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2021
28 Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez:
28
4
2021
pubmed:
29
4
2021
medline:
2
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. We investigated multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) plain scan and multi-phase CT enhancement features to aid ChRCC preoperative diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS MDCT data of patients with pathologically confirmed ChRCC were retrospectively analyzed. We calculated the ratios of the CT value for the solid part of the mass to those of the renal cortex, aorta, and inferior vena cava. These ratios were designated as L01-3 for the CT plain scan images, La1-3 for the cortical phase, Lv1-3 for the nephrographic phase, and Lp1-3 for the pelvic phase. We classified the masses into types I, II, III, and IV by type of enhancement. RESULTS Sixty-eight masses were included and divided into 3 groups by tumor size (groups A, B, and C). Percentages of calcification, central scars, and small vessel signs were significantly different during the cortical phase for masses in all groups (all P<0.01). Significant differences in enhancement were observed between tumors with severe and mild degrees of enhancement (P<0.01); and among La1, Lv1, and Lp1; La2, Lv2, and Lp2; and La3, Lv3, and Lp3 after enhancement during the cortical, nephrographic, and renal pelvic phases (all P<0.01). The most common type of mass enhancement was type II, followed by type I, and differences between these 2 types were significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although the MDCT features for ChRCC are diverse, MDCT helped preoperatively diagnose ChRCC. Multiple MDCT features are needed to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33907175
pii: 929287
doi: 10.12659/MSM.929287
pmc: PMC8091903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e929287Références
Eur Urol. 2009 Oct;56(4):636-43
pubmed: 19595500
Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):793-802
pubmed: 19244046
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov;203(5):W516-24
pubmed: 25341166
Abdom Imaging. 2010 Aug;35(4):488-93
pubmed: 19536589
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Jul;42(7):1911-1918
pubmed: 28265706
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1268-76
pubmed: 24261366
Acta Radiol. 2016 Apr;57(4):500-6
pubmed: 25972369
Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):444-53
pubmed: 23382290
Can J Urol. 2013 Jun;20(3):6790-7
pubmed: 23783049
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Feb;48(2):191-9
pubmed: 26589610
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):343-350
pubmed: 27959744
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Dec;32(12):1822-34
pubmed: 18813125
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jun;15(6):804-834
pubmed: 28596261
Urologe A. 2014 Feb;53(2):228-35
pubmed: 23836364
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec;195(6):W421-7
pubmed: 21098174
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jun;178(6):1499-506
pubmed: 12034628
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):93-105
pubmed: 26935559
J Cancer. 2017 Sep 27;8(17):3474-3479
pubmed: 29151931
Acta Radiol. 2016 Sep;57(9):1114-22
pubmed: 26663389