The Role of Time in Risk and Risk Analysis: Implications for Resilience, Sustainability, and Management.
Definition of risk
foundations of risk
risk concept
time
Journal
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
ISSN: 1539-6924
Titre abrégé: Risk Anal
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
4
2021
medline:
29
4
2021
entrez:
28
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a persistent misconception that risk analysis is only suited for considering the immediate consequences of an event. Such a limitation would make risk analysis unsuitable for many challenges, including resilience, sustainability, and adaptation. Fortunately, there is no such limitation. However, this notion has stemmed from a lack of clarity regarding how time is considered in risk analysis and risk characterization. In this article, we discuss this issue and show that risk science provides concepts and frameworks that can appropriately address time. Ultimately, we propose an adjusted nomenclature for explicitly reflecting time in risk conceptualization and characterizations.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1959-1970Informations de copyright
© 2021 Society for Risk Analysis.
Références
Ahearne, J. F. (2000). Intergenerational issues regarding nuclear power, nuclear waste, and nuclear weapons. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206070
Aven, T. (2015). Risk analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13.
Aven, T. (2019). The call for a shift from risk to resilience: What does it mean? Risk Analysis, 39(6), 1196-1203.
Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2014). Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1164-1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12132
Belzer, R. B. (2000). Discounting across generations: Necessary, not suspect. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 779-792. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206072
Béné, C., Wood, R. G., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Working Papers, 2012(405), 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x
Cox, Jr, L. A. T. (2011). An exposure-response threshold for lung diseases and lung cancer caused by crystalline silica. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1543-1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01610.x
Espinoza, D., Morris, J., Baroud, H., Bisogno, M., Cifuentes, A., Gentzoglanis, A., … Vahedifard, F. (2020). The role of traditional discounted cash flows in the tragedy of the horizon: Another inconvenient truth. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 25(4), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09884-3
Flage, R., & Aven, T. (2009). Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis. Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory & Applications, 2(13), 9-18.
Milken Institute. (2018). C Santos-Burgoa A Goldman E Andrade N Barrett U Colon-Ramos M Edberg & S Zeger Ascertainment of the Estimated Excess Mortality from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico; Project Report. Washington, DC: Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University.
Glantz, M., & Jamieson, D. (2000). Societal response to hurricane mitch and intra- versus intergenerational equity issues: Whose norms should apply? Risk Analysis, 20(6), 869-882. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206080
Haimes, Y. Y. (2009). On the complex definition of risk: A systems-based approach. Risk Analysis, 29(12), 1647-1654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01310.x
Ho, C.-H. (1992). Risk assessment for the yucca mountain high-level nuclear waste repository site: Estimation of volcanic disruption. Mathematical geology, 24(4), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891268
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
Kishore, N., Marqués, D., Mahmud, A., Kiang, M. V., Rodriguez, I., Fuller, A., … Buckee, C. O. (2018). Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(2), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1803972
Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., … Thiel-Clemen, T. (2014). Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4, 407-409. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2227
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Keisler, J. (2018). Risk and resilience must be independently managed. Nature, 555(7694), 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-02567-0
Logan, T. M., & Guikema, S. D. (2020). Reframing resilience: Equitable access to essential services. Risk Analysis, 40, 1538-1553.
Okrent, D., & Pidgeon, N. (2000). Introduction: Dilemmas in intergenerational versus intragenerational equity and risk policy. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 759-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206069
Robles, F., Davis, K., Fink, S., & Almukhtar, S. (2017). Official toll in Puerto Rico: 64. Actual deaths may be 1,052. The New York Times.
Schelling, T. C. (2000). Intergenerational and international discounting. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 833-837. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206076
Shrader-Frechette, K. (2000). Duties to future generations, proxy consent, intra-and intergenerational equity: The case of nuclear waste. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 771-778.
Society of Risk Analysis (SRA). (2015). Society of Risk Analysis Glossary. Retrieved from https://sra.org/resources.
Starr, C. (2000). The ultimate uncertainty-intergenerational planning. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206073
Svenson, O., & Karlsson, G. (1989). Decision-making, time horizons, and risk in the very long-term perspective. Risk Analysis, 9(3), 385-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01004.x
Thompson, G. G., Maguire, L. A., & Regan, T. J. (2018). Evaluation of two approaches to defining extinction risk under the U.S. endangered species act. Risk Analysis, 38(5), 1009-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12927