Robotic pancreatic surgery: minimally invasive approach to challenging operations.


Journal

Minerva surgery
ISSN: 2724-5438
Titre abrégé: Minerva Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777295

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez: 28 4 2021
pubmed: 29 4 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pancreatic surgery is still associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to present the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatic surgery, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD), distal pancreatectomy (RDP) with or without splenectomy, enucleation (REN), and atypical resection (RAR), for benign, borderline, and malignant lesions at a high-volume center. A single-center, prospective database was used to retrospectively analyze the early outcomes of robotic pancreatic procedures completed between 2014 and 2020. Out of 124 attempted operations, 3 patients received palliative robotic surgery (2.4%). Of the remaining 121, 14 (11.6%) were converted to open surgery. The robotic procedures included 107 patients: 56 underwent RAPD, 31 underwent RDP (28 with and 3 without splenectomy), 16 underwent REN, and 4 underwent RAR (2 central and 2 total pancreatectomies). The preoperative baseline characteristics and comorbidities were consistent with those of a Western population. The overall incidence of complications was 43.9%, with the more severe (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) occurring after RAPD (19.6%). We collected 7 (13.1%) postoperative pancreatic fistulae after RAPD, 5 (16.1%) after RADP, and 2 (12.5%) after REN. The two central pancreatectomies developed a biochemical leak without sequelae. Three patients (2.8%) died within 90 days after surgery. Early refeeding was achieved in those who did not experience severe complications, while the median hospital stay was 8 days. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 22, with non-R1 microscopic residual tumors found. Robotic pancreatic surgery is a safe and oncologically adequate technique to manage benign and malignant diseases arising from the head, body, and tail of the pancreas.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pancreatic surgery is still associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to present the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatic surgery, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD), distal pancreatectomy (RDP) with or without splenectomy, enucleation (REN), and atypical resection (RAR), for benign, borderline, and malignant lesions at a high-volume center.
METHODS METHODS
A single-center, prospective database was used to retrospectively analyze the early outcomes of robotic pancreatic procedures completed between 2014 and 2020. Out of 124 attempted operations, 3 patients received palliative robotic surgery (2.4%). Of the remaining 121, 14 (11.6%) were converted to open surgery. The robotic procedures included 107 patients: 56 underwent RAPD, 31 underwent RDP (28 with and 3 without splenectomy), 16 underwent REN, and 4 underwent RAR (2 central and 2 total pancreatectomies).
RESULTS RESULTS
The preoperative baseline characteristics and comorbidities were consistent with those of a Western population. The overall incidence of complications was 43.9%, with the more severe (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) occurring after RAPD (19.6%). We collected 7 (13.1%) postoperative pancreatic fistulae after RAPD, 5 (16.1%) after RADP, and 2 (12.5%) after REN. The two central pancreatectomies developed a biochemical leak without sequelae. Three patients (2.8%) died within 90 days after surgery. Early refeeding was achieved in those who did not experience severe complications, while the median hospital stay was 8 days. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 22, with non-R1 microscopic residual tumors found.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Robotic pancreatic surgery is a safe and oncologically adequate technique to manage benign and malignant diseases arising from the head, body, and tail of the pancreas.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33908238
pii: S2724-5691.21.08435-2
doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.21.08435-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

138-145

Auteurs

Lapo Bencini (L)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy - lapbenc@tin.it.

Irene Urciuoli (I)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Martina Trafeli (M)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Claudia Paolini (C)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Luca Moraldi (L)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Angela Tribuzi (A)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Sabrina Pacciani (S)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Andrea Coratti (A)

Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH