Physician Stress During Electronic Health Record Inbox Work: In Situ Measurement With Wearable Sensors.
EHR alerts
HRV
Inbasket
after-hours work
electronic health records
electronic mail
inbox
physician well-being
stress
wearables
Journal
JMIR medical informatics
ISSN: 2291-9694
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Inform
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2021
28 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
01
09
2020
accepted:
21
03
2021
revised:
02
02
2021
entrez:
28
4
2021
pubmed:
29
4
2021
medline:
29
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increased work through electronic health record (EHR) messaging is frequently cited as a factor of physician burnout. However, studies to date have relied on anecdotal or self-reported measures, which limit the ability to match EHR use patterns with continuous stress patterns throughout the day. The aim of this study is to collect EHR use and physiologic stress data through unobtrusive means that provide objective and continuous measures, cluster distinct patterns of EHR inbox work, identify physicians' daily physiologic stress patterns, and evaluate the association between EHR inbox work patterns and physician physiologic stress. Physicians were recruited from 5 medical centers. Participants (N=47) were given wrist-worn devices (Garmin Vivosmart 3) with heart rate sensors to wear for 7 days. The devices measured physiological stress throughout the day based on heart rate variability (HRV). Perceived stress was also measured with self-reports through experience sampling and a one-time survey. From the EHR system logs, the time attributed to different activities was quantified. By using a clustering algorithm, distinct inbox work patterns were identified and their associated stress measures were compared. The effects of EHR use on physician stress were examined using a generalized linear mixed effects model. Physicians spent an average of 1.08 hours doing EHR inbox work out of an average total EHR time of 3.5 hours. Patient messages accounted for most of the inbox work time (mean 37%, SD 11%). A total of 3 patterns of inbox work emerged: inbox work mostly outside work hours, inbox work mostly during work hours, and inbox work extending after hours that were mostly contiguous to work hours. Across these 3 groups, physiologic stress patterns showed 3 periods in which stress increased: in the first hour of work, early in the afternoon, and in the evening. Physicians in group 1 had the longest average stress duration during work hours (80 out of 243 min of valid HRV data; P=.02), as measured by physiological sensors. Inbox work duration, the rate of EHR window switching (moving from one screen to another), the proportion of inbox work done outside of work hours, inbox work batching, and the day of the week were each independently associated with daily stress duration (marginal R This study is among the first to demonstrate associations between electronic inbox work and physiological stress. We identified 3 potentially modifiable factors associated with stress: EHR window switching, inbox work duration, and inbox work outside work hours. Organizations seeking to reduce physician stress may consider system-based changes to reduce EHR window switching or inbox work duration or the incorporation of inbox management time into work hours.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Increased work through electronic health record (EHR) messaging is frequently cited as a factor of physician burnout. However, studies to date have relied on anecdotal or self-reported measures, which limit the ability to match EHR use patterns with continuous stress patterns throughout the day.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to collect EHR use and physiologic stress data through unobtrusive means that provide objective and continuous measures, cluster distinct patterns of EHR inbox work, identify physicians' daily physiologic stress patterns, and evaluate the association between EHR inbox work patterns and physician physiologic stress.
METHODS
METHODS
Physicians were recruited from 5 medical centers. Participants (N=47) were given wrist-worn devices (Garmin Vivosmart 3) with heart rate sensors to wear for 7 days. The devices measured physiological stress throughout the day based on heart rate variability (HRV). Perceived stress was also measured with self-reports through experience sampling and a one-time survey. From the EHR system logs, the time attributed to different activities was quantified. By using a clustering algorithm, distinct inbox work patterns were identified and their associated stress measures were compared. The effects of EHR use on physician stress were examined using a generalized linear mixed effects model.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Physicians spent an average of 1.08 hours doing EHR inbox work out of an average total EHR time of 3.5 hours. Patient messages accounted for most of the inbox work time (mean 37%, SD 11%). A total of 3 patterns of inbox work emerged: inbox work mostly outside work hours, inbox work mostly during work hours, and inbox work extending after hours that were mostly contiguous to work hours. Across these 3 groups, physiologic stress patterns showed 3 periods in which stress increased: in the first hour of work, early in the afternoon, and in the evening. Physicians in group 1 had the longest average stress duration during work hours (80 out of 243 min of valid HRV data; P=.02), as measured by physiological sensors. Inbox work duration, the rate of EHR window switching (moving from one screen to another), the proportion of inbox work done outside of work hours, inbox work batching, and the day of the week were each independently associated with daily stress duration (marginal R
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study is among the first to demonstrate associations between electronic inbox work and physiological stress. We identified 3 potentially modifiable factors associated with stress: EHR window switching, inbox work duration, and inbox work outside work hours. Organizations seeking to reduce physician stress may consider system-based changes to reduce EHR window switching or inbox work duration or the incorporation of inbox management time into work hours.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33908888
pii: v9i4e24014
doi: 10.2196/24014
pmc: PMC8116996
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e24014Informations de copyright
©Fatema Akbar, Gloria Mark, Stephanie Prausnitz, E Margaret Warton, Jeffrey A East, Mark F Moeller, Mary E Reed, Tracy A Lieu. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 28.04.2021.
Références
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Nov;95(11):4959-64
pubmed: 20739384
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):727-35
pubmed: 23268489
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 03;21(6):e13313
pubmed: 31162125
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1695-1696
pubmed: 31073856
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(7B):201-8
pubmed: 18578796
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):336-347
pubmed: 29768634
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct;8(4):1057-1067
pubmed: 29241245
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Aug;49(8):1697-1703
pubmed: 28709155
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Oct;21(10):719-24
pubmed: 9789691
Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):441-52
pubmed: 21361964
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Mar 16;5(3):e34
pubmed: 28302596
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Sep 30;6(3):e13779
pubmed: 31573912
Brain Behav Immun. 2015 Nov;50:18-30
pubmed: 26256574
Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81
pubmed: 8737210
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Apr 04;7(2):e10949
pubmed: 30946023
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jul 05;8(3):686-697
pubmed: 28678892
Fam Med. 2020 Feb;52(2):135-137
pubmed: 32050270
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1825-1832
pubmed: 31292905
J Intern Med. 2009 Nov;266(5):467-75
pubmed: 19570055
Metabolism. 2002 Jun;51(6 Suppl 1):40-5
pubmed: 12040540
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):419-426
pubmed: 28893811
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 17;7(1):e12041
pubmed: 30664473
Bionanoscience. 2013;3:172-183
pubmed: 25530929
Am J Med. 2012 Feb;125(2):209.e1-7
pubmed: 22269625
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 5;7(4):e13466
pubmed: 31687938
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Jul;30(6):599-610
pubmed: 15808930
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):531-538
pubmed: 32016375
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 1;173(9):811-812
pubmed: 31355855
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2031856
pubmed: 33475754
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1401-1410
pubmed: 32719859
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):559-60
pubmed: 26974737
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2011 Jul;24(4):359-67
pubmed: 21253957
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 May 06;4(2):e13
pubmed: 27154599
Psychosom Med. 2008 Sep;70(7):787-96
pubmed: 18725434
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):702-4
pubmed: 23460235
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):106-114
pubmed: 30517663
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1073-1078
pubmed: 31260371
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 8;8(9):e18694
pubmed: 32897239
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62
pubmed: 12916575
Ind Health. 1998 Jul;36(3):263-72
pubmed: 9701906
Emotion. 2010 Aug;10(4):587-92
pubmed: 20677875
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):923-930
pubmed: 33063087
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jul;91(7):836-48
pubmed: 27313121
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Dec;44(12):1031-51
pubmed: 17111118
J Med Eng Technol. 2017 Aug;41(6):480-485
pubmed: 28675070