Journal

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 01 01 2021
accepted: 04 04 2021
pubmed: 29 4 2021
medline: 24 7 2021
entrez: 28 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine whether interim 3'-deoxy-3'-[ Ninety-two prospectively enrolled patients with DLBCL underwent both FLT-PET/CT and FDG-PET/CT 18-24 days after two cycles of R-CHOP/R-EPOCH. Deauville-criteria, PERCIST1.0, standardized uptake value (SUV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and metabolic tumor volume were used to interpret iFDG-PET/CT while dichotomous visual interpretation was used to interpret iFLT-PET/CT and the results were compared with the 3- and 5-year PFS. iFLT-PET/CT was negative in 67 (73%) and positive in 25 (27%) patients. iFDG-PET/CT by Deauville criteria was negative (Deauville scores [DS] of 1-3) in 53 (58%) and positive (DS = 4-5) in 39 (42%) patients. Of the 67 iFLT-PET/CT-negative patients, 7 (10.4%) progressed at a median of 14.1 months whereas 14/25 (56.0%) iFLT-PET/CT-positive patients progressed at a median of 7.8 months (P < .0001). Of the 53 Deauville-negative patients, 9 (17.0%) progressed at a median of 14.1 months whereas 12/39 (30.8%) Deauville-positive patients progressed at a median of 5.6 months (P = .11). In multivariate analysis, including iFLT-PET/CT, PERCIST, interim TLG, and interim SUV In patients with DLBCL given R-CHOP/R-EPOCH, iFLT-PET/CT is a superior independent predictor of outcome compared with iFDG-PET/CT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33909086
doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05353-9
pii: 10.1007/s00259-021-05353-9
pmc: PMC8263539
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 0Z5B2CJX4D
Vincristine 5J49Q6B70F
Doxorubicin 80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide 8N3DW7272P
Prednisone VB0R961HZT

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2883-2893

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA152923
Pays : United States

Références

Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–86.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2403
Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, Mottaghy FM, Dietlein M, Guermazi A, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:571–8.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of hodgkin and non-hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–67.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800
Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Brice P, Rain JD, Belhadj K, et al. [18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood. 2005;106:1376–81.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0272
Moskowitz CH, Schoder H, Teruya-Feldstein J, Sima C, Iasonos A, Portlock CS, et al. Risk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1896–903.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.5942
Casasnovas RO, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Bardet S, Julian A, Thieblemont C, et al. SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118:37–43.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-327767
Thomas A, Gingrich RD, Smith BJ, Jacobus L, Ristow K, Allmer C, et al. 18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography report interpretation as predictor of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma including analysis of ‘indeterminate’ reports. Leuk Lymph. 2010;51:439–46.
doi: 10.3109/10428190903560198
Cheson BD, Kostakoglu L. FDG-PET for early response assessment in lymphomas: part 2—diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Use of Quantitative PET Evaluation Oncology (Williston Park). 2017;31:71–6.
Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, de Groot T, et al. Early restaging positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1356–63.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf256
Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Zoe H, Goldsmith SJ. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1018–27.
pubmed: 12163626
Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, Petegnief Y, Luciani A, Dupuis J, et al. Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1626–32.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.042093
Itti E, Lin C, Dupuis J, Paone G, Capacchione D, Rahmouni A, et al. Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment at 4 cycles of chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:527–33.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057703
Cashen AF, Dehdashti F, Luo J, Homb A, Siegel BA, Bartlett NL, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:386–92.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.082586
Dupuis J, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Hemery F, Gisselbrecht C, Lin C, et al. Response assessment after an inductive CHOP or CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab in 103 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: integrating 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the International Workshop Criteria. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:503–7.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn671
Le Roux PY, Gastinne T, Le Gouill S, Nowak E, Bodet-Milin C, Querellou S, et al. Prognostic value of interim FDG PET/CT in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients treated with interim response-adapted strategy: comparison of International Harmonization Project (IHP), Gallamini and London criteria. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1064–71.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1741-0
Le Gouill S, Casasnovas RO. Interim PET-driven strategy in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: do we trust the driver? Blood. 2017;129:3059–70.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-672196
Burggraaff CN, de Jong A, Hoekstra OS, Hoetjes NJ, Nievelstein RAJ, Jansma EP, et al. Predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:65–79.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4103-3
Barrington SF, Kluge R. FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(Suppl 1):97–110.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3690-8
Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Bormans G, Balzarini J, Verhoef G, et al. [(18)F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [(18)F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:682–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1120-6
Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C. Report on the first international workshop on interim-PET-scan in lymphoma. Leuk Lymph. 2009;50:1257–60.
doi: 10.1080/10428190903040048
Buck AK, Bommer M, Stilgenbauer S, Juweid M, Glatting G, Schirrmeister H, et al. Molecular imaging of proliferation in malignant lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11055–61.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1955
Minamimoto R, Fayad L, Advani R, Vose J, Macapinlac H, Meza J, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: prospective multicenter comparison of early interim 18F-FLT PET/CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT using IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST criteria for early therapeutic monitoring of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Radiology. 2016;280:220–9.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150689
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
Werner-Wasik M, Nelson AD, Choi W, et al. What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1164–71.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.055
Schöder H, Polley MC, Knopp MV, Hall N, Kostakoglu L, Zhang J, et al. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results from the CALGB 50303 Clinical Trial. Blood. 2020;135:2224–34. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019003277 .
doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003277 pubmed: 32232481 pmcid: 7316220
Mikhaeel NG, Cunningham D, Counsell N, McMillan A, Radford JA, Ardeshna KM, et al. FDG-PET/CT after two cycles of R-CHOP in DLBCL predicts complete remission but has limited value in identifying patients with poor outcome - final result of a UK National Cancer Research Institute prospective study. Br J Haematol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16875 .
Davies L, Jenkins S, Allen J. Taylor PR. Tissue-resident macrophages Nat Immunol. 2013;14:986–95.
doi: 10.1038/ni.2705
Davies LC, Rosas M, Jenkins SJ, Liao CT, Scurr MJ, Brombacher F, et al. Distinct bone marrow-derived and tissue resident macrophage-lineages proliferate at key stages during inflammation. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1886.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms2877
Post GR, Yuan Y, Holthoff ER, Quick CM, Post SR. Identification of a novel monocytic phenotype in classic Hodgkin lymphoma tumor microenvironment. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0224621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224621 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224621 pubmed: 31714922 pmcid: 6850552
Cioroianu AL, Stinga PI, Striclaru L, Cioplea MD, Nichita L, Popp C, et al. Tumor Microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: role and prognosis. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2019;2019:8586354.
Schöder H, Zelenetz AD, Hamlin P, Gavane S, Horwitz S, Matasar M, et al. Prospective study of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET for early interim response assessment in advanced-stage B-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:728–34.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166769
Bartlett NL, Wilson WH, Jung SH, Hsi ED, Maurer MJ, Pederson LD, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R compared with R-CHOP as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: clinical outcomes of the phase III intergroup trial Alliance/CALGB 50303. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1790–9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01994
Lee SJ, Oh SJ, Chi DY, Kil HS, Kim EN, Ryu JS, et al. Simple and highly efficient synthesis of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine using nucleophilic fluorination catalyzed by protic solvent. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0391-8 .

Auteurs

Ryogo Minamimoto (R)

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Division of Nuclear Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Luis Fayad (L)

Departments of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Julie Vose (J)

Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Jane Meza (J)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA.

Ranjana Advani (R)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.

Jordan Hankins (J)

Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Felix Mottaghy (F)

Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Oncology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Germany.
Cologne and Duesseldorf and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Homer Macapinlac (H)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Alexander Heinzel (A)

Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Oncology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Germany.
Cologne and Duesseldorf and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Malik E Juweid (ME)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Queen Rania Street, Al Jubeiha, Amman, 11942, Jordan. m.juweid@ju.edu.jo.

Andrew Quon (A)

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH