The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.
Journal
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
ISSN: 1558-9102
Titre abrégé: J Speech Lang Hear Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9705610
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 05 2021
11 05 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
4
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
28
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Purpose The reliability of auditory-perceptual judgments between listeners is a long-standing problem in the assessment of voice disorders. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a relatively novel experimental scaling method, called visual sort and rate (VSR), yielded stronger reliability than the more frequently used method of visual analog scales (VAS) for ratings of overall severity (OS) and breathiness (BR) in speakers with voicedisorders. Method Fifty speech samples were selected from a database of speakers with voice disorders. Twenty-two inexperienced listeners provided ratings of OS or BR in four rating blocks: VSR-OS, VSR-BR, VAS-OS, and VSR-BR. For the VAS task, listeners rated each speaker for BR or OS using a vertically oriented 100-mm VAS. For the VSR task, stimuli were distributed into sets of samples with a range of speaker severities in each set. Listeners sorted and ranked samples for OS or BR within each set, and final ratings were captured on a vertically oriented 100-mm VAS. Interrater variability, defined as the mean of the squared differences between a listener's ratings and group mean ratings, and intrarater reliability (Pearson
Identifiants
pubmed: 33909472
doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00623
pmc: PMC8608224
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1571-1580Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC015570
Pays : United States
Références
J Voice. 2006 Jun;20(2):229-41
pubmed: 16139475
Hum Factors. 1968 Aug;10(4):303-19
pubmed: 5726868
J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):341-52
pubmed: 18346869
J Voice. 1999 Dec;13(4):508-17
pubmed: 10622517
Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56
pubmed: 6226917
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):566-75
pubmed: 25675090
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009 May;18(2):124-32
pubmed: 18930908
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Aug;58(4):1134-44
pubmed: 26102242
J Voice. 2005 Mar;19(1):1-14
pubmed: 15766846
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Feb;45(1):111-26
pubmed: 14748643
J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):527-44
pubmed: 16324823
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22
pubmed: 23026732
J Voice. 2016 Mar;30(2):177-85
pubmed: 26028369
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):453-62
pubmed: 23297917
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):663.e9-663.e16
pubmed: 31932189
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003;28(3):109-16
pubmed: 14596329
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Apr;54(2):430-47
pubmed: 20884782
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1787-95
pubmed: 8817904
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Dec;112(6):3014-21
pubmed: 12509023
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Nov;136(5):2798-806
pubmed: 25373979
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Feb;36(1):21-40
pubmed: 8450660
Acta Acust United Acust. 2016 Mar-Apr;102(2):209-213
pubmed: 27134616
J Voice. 2010 Mar;24(2):168-77
pubmed: 19185451
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):838-845
pubmed: 30064717
J Voice. 2010 Sep;24(5):540-55
pubmed: 19883993
J Voice. 2007 Sep;21(5):576-90
pubmed: 16822648
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Apr;117(4 Pt 1):2201-11
pubmed: 15898661
Anesth Analg. 1999 Dec;89(6):1517-20
pubmed: 10589640
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Feb;20(1):14-22
pubmed: 20739631
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2354-64
pubmed: 17902870
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Feb 15;61(2):298-323
pubmed: 29392295
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Oct 1;59(5):994-1001
pubmed: 27626612
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul;138(1):1-10
pubmed: 26233000
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Sep;104(3 Pt 1):1598-608
pubmed: 9745743