Domestic dog demographics and estimates of canine vaccination coverage in a rural area of Zambia for the elimination of rabies.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
01
10
2020
accepted:
07
02
2021
entrez:
28
4
2021
pubmed:
29
4
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An estimated 75% or more of the human rabies cases in Africa occur in rural settings, which underscores the importance of rabies control in these areas. Understanding dog demographics can help design strategies for rabies control and plan and conduct canine mass vaccination campaigns effectively in African countries. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate domestic dog demographics in Kalambabakali, in the rural Mazabuka District of Zambia. The population of ownerless dogs and the total achievable vaccination coverage among the total dog population was estimated using the capture-recapture-based Bayesian model by conducting a canine mass vaccination campaign. This study revealed that 29% of the domestic dog population was under one year old, and 57.7% of those were under three months old and thus were not eligible for the canine rabies vaccination in Zambia. The population growth was estimated at 15% per annum based on the cross-sectional household survey. The population of ownerless dogs was estimated to be small, with an ownerless-to-owned-dog ratio of 0.01-0.06 in the target zones. The achieved overall vaccination coverage from the first mass vaccination was estimated 19.8-51.6%. This low coverage was principally attributed to the owners' lack of information, unavailability, and dog-handling difficulties. The follow-up mass vaccination campaign achieved an overall coverage of 54.8-76.2%. This paper indicates the potential for controlling canine rabies through mass vaccination in rural Zambia. Rabies education and responsible dog ownership are required to achieve high and sustainable vaccination coverage. Our findings also propose including puppies below three months old in the target population for rabies vaccination and emphasize that securing an annual enforcement of canine mass vaccination that reaches 70% coverage in the dog population is necessary to maintain protective herd immunity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
An estimated 75% or more of the human rabies cases in Africa occur in rural settings, which underscores the importance of rabies control in these areas. Understanding dog demographics can help design strategies for rabies control and plan and conduct canine mass vaccination campaigns effectively in African countries.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate domestic dog demographics in Kalambabakali, in the rural Mazabuka District of Zambia. The population of ownerless dogs and the total achievable vaccination coverage among the total dog population was estimated using the capture-recapture-based Bayesian model by conducting a canine mass vaccination campaign. This study revealed that 29% of the domestic dog population was under one year old, and 57.7% of those were under three months old and thus were not eligible for the canine rabies vaccination in Zambia. The population growth was estimated at 15% per annum based on the cross-sectional household survey. The population of ownerless dogs was estimated to be small, with an ownerless-to-owned-dog ratio of 0.01-0.06 in the target zones. The achieved overall vaccination coverage from the first mass vaccination was estimated 19.8-51.6%. This low coverage was principally attributed to the owners' lack of information, unavailability, and dog-handling difficulties. The follow-up mass vaccination campaign achieved an overall coverage of 54.8-76.2%.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
This paper indicates the potential for controlling canine rabies through mass vaccination in rural Zambia. Rabies education and responsible dog ownership are required to achieve high and sustainable vaccination coverage. Our findings also propose including puppies below three months old in the target population for rabies vaccination and emphasize that securing an annual enforcement of canine mass vaccination that reaches 70% coverage in the dog population is necessary to maintain protective herd immunity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33909621
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009222
pii: PNTD-D-20-01743
pmc: PMC8081203
doi:
Substances chimiques
Rabies Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0009222Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Author Aaron S Mweene was unable to confirm their authorship contributions. On their behalf, the corresponding author has reported their contributions to the best of their knowledge.
Références
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(4):304-10
pubmed: 12075367
Vaccine. 1996 Feb;14(3):185-6
pubmed: 8920697
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Nov;137(11):1558-67
pubmed: 19327197
Acta Trop. 2000 Feb 25;75(1):95-108
pubmed: 10708011
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jun 8;10(1):199
pubmed: 28595654
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:44-51
pubmed: 28992927
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Dec 05;8:236
pubmed: 23217194
Acta Trop. 2001 Mar 30;78(3):217-30
pubmed: 11311185
Vet Rec. 2007 Sep 1;161(9):293-4
pubmed: 17766806
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):615-24
pubmed: 8261565
Virus Genes. 2019 Oct;55(5):713-719
pubmed: 31267444
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;19(4):529-33
pubmed: 23628197
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 May 22;13(5):e0007377
pubmed: 31116732
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):91-100
pubmed: 24592494
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167092
pubmed: 27893866
Vet Rec. 2015 Aug 8;177(6):150
pubmed: 26109286
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(10):739-44
pubmed: 14758434
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 May;83(5):360-8
pubmed: 15976877
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 16;9(4):e0003709
pubmed: 25881058
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1993 Dec;60(4):437-43
pubmed: 7777333
J Wildl Dis. 1978 Oct;14(4):513-7
pubmed: 105155
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 14;10(7):e0004824
pubmed: 27414810
Vet Rec. 2001 Apr 21;148(16):511-2
pubmed: 11345995
Antiviral Res. 2013 Jun;98(3):357-64
pubmed: 23603498
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Feb 23;4(2):e626
pubmed: 20186330
BMC Infect Dis. 2001;1:23
pubmed: 11737869
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 9;11(10):e0005946
pubmed: 28991898
Zoonoses Public Health. 2011 Feb;58(1):21-7
pubmed: 20887398
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 29;10(10):e0141689
pubmed: 26513160
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Nov 06;9(11):e0004177
pubmed: 26545242
PLoS Biol. 2009 Mar 10;7(3):e53
pubmed: 19278295
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013 Sep;13(9):643-9
pubmed: 23805791
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Nov 13;8(11):e3160
pubmed: 25393023
J Appl Ecol. 2014 Aug;51(4):1096-1106
pubmed: 25657481
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Jun 15;120(2):203-209
pubmed: 25953653
Vaccine. 2003 May 16;21(17-18):1965-73
pubmed: 12706685
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Mar 1;118(4):436-48
pubmed: 25650307
Virus Res. 2012 Jan;163(1):160-8
pubmed: 21930165
Vaccine. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):152-60
pubmed: 18848595