Partnering bevacizumab with irinotecan as first line-therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer improves progression free survival-A retrospective analysis.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Irinotecan
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
01
06
2020
accepted:
08
03
2021
entrez:
28
4
2021
pubmed:
29
4
2021
medline:
16
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Colorectal cancer remains one of the most frequent malignancies (third place at both genders) worldwide in the last decade, owing to significant changes in modern dietary habits. Approximately half of the patients develop metastases during the course of their disease. The available therapeutic armamentarium is constantly evolving, raising questions regarding the best approach for improving survival. Bevacizumab remains one of the most widely used therapies for treating metastatic colorectal cancer and can be used after progression. This study aimed to identify the best chemotherapy partner for bevacizumab after progression. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with bevacizumab as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Data were collected for 151 patients, 40 of whom were treated with double-dose bevacizumab after the first progression. The two standard chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab were FOLFIRI/CAPIRI and FOLFOX4/CAPEOX. The initiation of first-line treatment with irinotecan-based chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and time to treatment failure but not overall survival. After the first progression, retreatment with the same regimen as that used in the induction phase was the best approach for improving overall survival (median overall survival: 46.5 vs. 27.0 months for the same vs. switched strategy, respectively). No correlations were observed between the dose intensity of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, or bevacizumab and the overall survival, progression-free survival in the first-/second-line treatment, and time to treatment failure. Interaction between an irinotecan-based regimen as a second-line treatment and double-dose bevacizumab after progression was associated with an improved overall survival (p = 0.06). Initiating systemic treatment with an irinotecan-based regimen in combination with bevacizumab improved the progression-free survival in the first-line treatment and time to treatment failure. In terms of overall survival, bevacizumab treatment after the first progression is better partnered with the same regimen as that used in the induction phase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33909622
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248922
pii: PONE-D-20-16569
pmc: PMC8081186
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Irinotecan
7673326042
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0248922Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):394-400
pubmed: 16421419
Drugs. 2008;68(7):949-61
pubmed: 18457461
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135599
pubmed: 26275292
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):642-53
pubmed: 21641867
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;25(2):213-8
pubmed: 27308653
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;29(31):4199-204
pubmed: 21969501
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi64-72
pubmed: 24078664
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953
pubmed: 30350310
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4287-99
pubmed: 22766981
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 24;16:677
pubmed: 27558497
Oncologist. 2013;18(9):1004-12
pubmed: 23881988
Histopathology. 2010 Mar;56(4):430-9
pubmed: 20459550
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;12:89
pubmed: 22414244
Ann Oncol. 2009 Nov;20(11):1842-7
pubmed: 19406901
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1355-69
pubmed: 26361971
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:82-90
pubmed: 26608114
Bull Cancer. 2016 Jun;103(6):541-51
pubmed: 27155924
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Mar;17(1):65-72
pubmed: 29153430
J BUON. 2020 Mar-Apr;25(2):875-883
pubmed: 32521881
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012 Mar;4(2):75-89
pubmed: 22423266
Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1843-52
pubmed: 25862517
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Apr;136:20-30
pubmed: 30878125
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;73(4):847-55
pubmed: 24577566
J BUON. 2017 May-Jun;22(3):568-577
pubmed: 28730758
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5727-33
pubmed: 19786657
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;33(8):1125-1130
pubmed: 29680896
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Dec 04;11:8605-8621
pubmed: 30584320
Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1486-95
pubmed: 23015662
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 17;8(42):73009-73016
pubmed: 29069844
J BUON. 2018 Dec;23(7):122-131
pubmed: 30722121