Endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke with tandem occlusion.
hemorrhage
stroke
thrombectomy
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
14
12
2020
revised:
12
04
2021
accepted:
14
04
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
23
3
2022
entrez:
29
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endovascular therapy (EVT) is effective and safe in patients with tandem occlusion. The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to EVT in acute tandem occlusion is debatable. To compare EVT alone with EVT plus IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusions. This is an individual patient pooled analysis of the Thrombectomy In TANdem lesions (TITAN) and Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registries. Patients were divided into two groups based on prior IVT treatment: (1) IVT+ group, which included patients who received IVT prior to EVT, (2) IVT- group, which included patients who did not receive IVT prior to EVT. Propensity score (inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)) was used to reduce baseline between-group differences. The primary outcome was favorable outcome-that is, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Overall, 602 consecutive patients with an acute stroke with tandem occlusion were included (380 and 222 in the bridging therapy and EVT alone groups, respectively). Onset to imaging time was shorter in the IVT+ group (median 103 vs 140 min). In contrast, imaging to puncture time was longer in the IVT+ group (median 107 vs 91 min). In IPTW analysis, the IVT+ group had higher odds of favorable outcome, excellent outcome (90-day mRS score 0-1), and successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b/3 at the end of EVT). There was no difference in the risk of significant hemorrhagic complications between groups. In secondary analysis of patients treated with acute cervical internal carotid artery stenting, bridging therapy was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome and lower odds of mortality at 90 days. Our results suggest that bridging therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior tandem occlusion is safe and may improve functional outcome, even in the setting of acute cervical internal carotid artery stenting during EVT.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endovascular therapy (EVT) is effective and safe in patients with tandem occlusion. The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to EVT in acute tandem occlusion is debatable.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To compare EVT alone with EVT plus IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusions.
METHODS
METHODS
This is an individual patient pooled analysis of the Thrombectomy In TANdem lesions (TITAN) and Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registries. Patients were divided into two groups based on prior IVT treatment: (1) IVT+ group, which included patients who received IVT prior to EVT, (2) IVT- group, which included patients who did not receive IVT prior to EVT. Propensity score (inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)) was used to reduce baseline between-group differences. The primary outcome was favorable outcome-that is, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0 to 2 at 90 days.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 602 consecutive patients with an acute stroke with tandem occlusion were included (380 and 222 in the bridging therapy and EVT alone groups, respectively). Onset to imaging time was shorter in the IVT+ group (median 103 vs 140 min). In contrast, imaging to puncture time was longer in the IVT+ group (median 107 vs 91 min). In IPTW analysis, the IVT+ group had higher odds of favorable outcome, excellent outcome (90-day mRS score 0-1), and successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b/3 at the end of EVT). There was no difference in the risk of significant hemorrhagic complications between groups. In secondary analysis of patients treated with acute cervical internal carotid artery stenting, bridging therapy was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome and lower odds of mortality at 90 days.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that bridging therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior tandem occlusion is safe and may improve functional outcome, even in the setting of acute cervical internal carotid artery stenting during EVT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33911016
pii: neurintsurg-2020-017202
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017202
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fibrinolytic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
314-320Investigateurs
Francis Turjman
(F)
Michel Piotin
(M)
Henrik Steglich-Arnholm
(H)
Markus Holtmannspötter
(M)
Christian Taschner
(C)
Sebastian Eiden
(S)
Diogo C Haussen
(DC)
Muhammad Waqas
(M)
Maria Boutchakova
(M)
Franziska Dorn
(F)
Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer
(M)
Salvatore Mangiafico
(S)
Marios N Psychogios
(MN)
Marc-Antoine Labeyrie
(MA)
Alessandra Biondi
(A)
Serge Bracard
(S)
Jonathan Andrew Grossberg
(JA)
Adrien Guenego
(A)
Julien Darcourt
(J)
Isabelle Vukasinovic
(I)
Elisa Pomero
(E)
Jason Davies
(J)
Leonardo Renieri
(L)
Corentin Hecker
(C)
Maria Muchada Muchada
(MM)
Arturo Consoli
(A)
Georges Rodesch
(G)
Emmanuel Houdart
(E)
Johanna Lockau
(J)
Andreas Kastrup
(A)
Hocine Redjem
(H)
Daniel Behme
(D)
Hussain Shallwani
(H)
Maurer Christopher
(M)
Gioia Mione
(G)
Lisa Humbertjean
(L)
Nolwenn Riou-Comte
(N)
François Zhu
(F)
Anne-Laure Derelle
(AL)
Liang Liao
(L)
Michel Piotin
(M)
Raphael Blanc
(R)
Hocine Redjem
(H)
Simon Escalard
(S)
Jean-Philippe Desilles
(JP)
Gabriele Ciccio
(G)
Stanislas Smajda
(S)
Mikael Mazighi
(M)
Mikael Obadia
(M)
Candice Sabben
(C)
Ovide Corabianu
(O)
Thomas de Broucker
(T)
Didier Smadja
(D)
Sonia Alamowitch
(S)
Olivier Ille
(O)
Eric Manchon
(E)
Pierre-Yves Garcia
(PY)
Guillaume Taylor
(G)
Malek Ben Maacha
(MB)
Adrien Wang
(A)
Serge Evrard
(S)
Maya Tchikviladze
(M)
Nadia Ajili
(N)
Bertrand Lapergue
(B)
David Weisenburger
(D)
Lucas Gorza
(L)
Oguzhan Coskun
(O)
Arturo Consoli
(A)
Federico Di Maria
(FD)
Georges Rodesh
(G)
Morgan Leguen
(M)
Julie Gratieux
(J)
Fernando Pico
(F)
Haja Rakotoharinandrasana
(H)
Philippe Tassan
(P)
Roxanna Poll
(R)
Sylvie Marinier
(S)
Gaultier Marnat
(G)
Florent Gariel
(F)
Xavier Barreau
(X)
Jérôme Berge
(J)
Louis Veunac
(L)
Patrice Menegon
(P)
Igor Sibon
(I)
Ludovic Lucas
(L)
Stéphane Olindo
(S)
Pauline Renou
(P)
Sharmila Sagnier
(S)
Mathilde Poli
(M)
Sabrina Debruxelles
(S)
Thomas Tourdias
(T)
Jean-Sebastien Liegey
(JS)
Romain Bourcier
(R)
Lili Detraz
(L)
Benjamin Daumas-Duport
(B)
Pierre-Louis Alexandre
(PL)
Monica Roy
(M)
Cédric Lenoble
(C)
Vincent L'allinec
(V)
Jean-Baptiste Girot
(JB)
Hubert Desal
(H)
Benjamin Gory
(B)
Isabelle Costa
(I)
Serge Bracard
(S)
René Anxionnat
(R)
Marc Braun
(M)
Anne-Laure Derelle
(AL)
Romain Tonnelet
(R)
Liang Liao
(L)
François Zhu
(F)
Emmanuelle Schmitt
(E)
Sophie Planel
(S)
Sébastien Richard
(S)
Lisa Humbertjean
(L)
Gioia Mione
(G)
Jean-Christophe Lacour
(JC)
Nolwenn Riou-Comte
(N)
Gabriela Hossu
(G)
Marine Beaumont
(M)
Mitchelle Bailang
(M)
Gérard Audibert
(G)
Marie Reitter
(M)
Agnès Masson
(A)
Lionel Alb
(L)
Adriana Tabarna
(A)
Marcela Voicu
(M)
Iona Podar
(I)
Madalina Brezeanu
(M)
Vincent Costalat
(V)
Caroline Arquizan
(C)
Cyril Dargazanli
(C)
Grégory Gascou
(G)
Pierre-Henri Lefèvre
(PH)
Imad Derraz
(I)
Carlos Riquelme
(C)
Nicolas Gaillard
(N)
Isabelle Mourand
(I)
Lucas Corti
(L)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: AMS reports support from Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic; and consulting fees from: Terumo, Stryker, Penumbra, Siemens. BL reports grants from Stryker, Penumbra, and Microvention. MM reports personal fees from Acticor Biotech, Air liquide, Amgen, and Boerhinger. RGN: principal investigator, Stryker Neurovascular (DAWN trial (no compensation), Trevo-2 trial), Cerenovus/Neuravi (ENDOLOW trial, no compensation); consultant to Stryker Neurovascular; steering committee member, Stryker Neurovascular(no compensation), Medtronic (SWIFT trial, SWIFT Prime trial (no compensation)), Cerenovus/Neuravi (ARISE-2 trial, no compensation); angiographic core lab, Medtronic (STAR trial); executive committee member, Penumbra (no compensation); physician advisory board, Cerenovus/Neuravi, Phenox, Anaconda, Genentech, Biogen, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Allm Inc.(no compensation), Viz-AI (stock options). AHS: financial interest/investor/stock options/ownership: Amnis Therapeutics, Apama Medical,Blink TBI, Inc., Buffalo Technology Partners, Inc., Cardinal Health, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Claret Medical, Cognition Medical, Endostream Medical, Ltd., Imperative Care, International Medical Distribution Partners, Rebound Therapeutics Corp., Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Synchron, Three Rivers Medical, Inc., Viseon Spine, Inc; consultant/advisory board: Amnis Therapeutics, Boston Scientific, Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc., Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Cerenovus, Claret Medical, Corindus, Inc., Endostream Medical, Ltd., Guidepoint 15Global Consulting, Imperative Care, Integra, Medtronic, MicroVention, Northwest University—DSMB Chair for HEAT Trial, Penumbra, Rapid Medical, Rebound Therapeutics Corp., Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Stryker, Three Rivers Medical, Inc.,VasSol, W.L. Gore & Associates; national PI/steering committees: Cerenovus LARGE Trial and ARISE II Trial, Medtronic SWIFTPRIME and SWIFT DIRECT Trials, MicroVention FRED Trial & CONFIDENCE Study, MUSC POSITIVE Trial,Penumbra 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial; principal investigator: Cummings Foundation grant.