Efficiency of plant growth promoting bacteria for growth and yield enhancement of maize (
Ammonia
HCN
Indole Acetic-Acid (IAA)
Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)
Siderophore
Journal
Saudi journal of biological sciences
ISSN: 1319-562X
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Biol Sci
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 101543796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
revised:
12
12
2020
accepted:
12
01
2021
entrez:
29
4
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
30
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The usage of novel Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as bioinoculant is a good opportunity for ecological farming practices to improve soil condition, quality of grain, crops' yield and biodiversity conservation. The purpose of recent research was focused to examine, isolate and characterize PGP bacteria that colonize the rhizosphere for the duration of the maize plant's seedling. For this purpose, 14 samples of soils and roots in the maize rhizosphere were collected from rock phosphate area of Hazara, Pakistan. Forty morphologically natural bacterial colonies have been extracted and tested for their PGP innovations and biocontrol residences and further recognized as plant production advancing rhizobacteria. To find the effective PGPR strains with numerous activities, an aggregate of 150 bacterial colonies were sequestered from different rhizospheric soils of the Hazara Pakistan rock phosphate area. These tested bacterial strains were subjected to biochemical description and in vitro screening for their plant growth-promoting qualities like generation of indole acetic acid (IAA), alkali (NH3), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), siderophores, catalases, proteases and pectinases. All the isolates of rhizobacteria showed IAA producing capacity, as well as found positive for catalase and HCN. The above results suggested that, in addition to biocontrol marketers, PGPR could be used as biofertilizers to substitute agro-chemicals in order to increase crop production. These microorganisms can therefore be further developed and used for greenhouse and discipline packages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33911946
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.025
pii: S1319-562X(21)00025-5
pmc: PMC8071923
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2316-2322Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Can J Microbiol. 1975 May;21(5):613-18
pubmed: 164997
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;28(4):1327-50
pubmed: 22805914
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3663-8
pubmed: 9758782
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Jul;19(4):1809-1834
pubmed: 33337075
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Sep;61(9):3443-53
pubmed: 16535129
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):4951-9
pubmed: 16151072
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:541-56
pubmed: 19575558
Anal Biochem. 1987 Jan;160(1):47-56
pubmed: 2952030
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jan;68(1):326-34
pubmed: 11772642
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 23;9:1473
pubmed: 30405652
Microb Ecol. 2005 Feb;49(2):272-81
pubmed: 15965726
AIMS Microbiol. 2017 Jun 7;3(3):413-434
pubmed: 31294169
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4434-46
pubmed: 22504815
Biotechnol Adv. 2014 Mar-Apr;32(2):429-48
pubmed: 24380797
Plant Mol Biol. 2016 Apr;90(6):635-44
pubmed: 26085172