Protective effect of calcium silicate toothpaste on enamel erosion and abrasion
Abrasion
Enamel
Erosion
Toothbrushing
Toothpaste
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2020
revised:
19
01
2021
accepted:
01
04
2021
entrez:
29
4
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
30
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare 48 sound and 48 enamel samples pre-treated with 1% citric acid were divided into 4 groups (n = 12): Group 1- Non-fluoride toothpaste; Group 2- NaF toothpaste (1450 ppmF); Group 3- CaSi toothpaste (1450 ppmF; MFP); Group 4- Erosion only. The samples were subjected to pH cycling (3 cycles/day; 90s; 1% citric acid, pH 3.6) and to abrasion for 7 days. After the 1 For sound enamel at baseline, mean (±SD) enamel loss (μm) for groups 1-4 on day 3 was 2.15 ± 0.35 Both F toothpastes led to significantly higher enamel protection from short-term erosion and abrasion in comparison to the non-F toothpaste and erosion only. In the longer term, CaSi toothpaste conferred significantly higher protection than NaF toothpaste. The results showed that for the longer term the CaSi toothpaste provided significantly higher protection than the NaF toothpaste, which indicates a good potential of the former to help prevent erosive tooth wear.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33912715
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06741
pii: S2405-8440(21)00844-6
pmc: PMC8066351
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e06741Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following conflict of interests: Dr Andrew Joiner works at Unilever. Unilever holds a patent on NR5 technology.
Références
J Dent. 2009 Oct;37(10):781-5
pubmed: 19577835
Int Dent J. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1:29-34
pubmed: 24571702
Int Dent J. 2005;55(3 Suppl 1):183-7
pubmed: 16004251
Caries Res. 1982;16(2):156-61
pubmed: 6951638
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):17909
pubmed: 29263431
Caries Res. 2011;45 Suppl 1:53-9
pubmed: 21625133
J Dent. 2010 Dec;38(12):974-9
pubmed: 20736044
J Dent Res. 1982 Nov;61(11):1236-9
pubmed: 6958719
Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:32-45
pubmed: 24993256
Int Dent J. 2005;55(3 Suppl 1):188-93
pubmed: 16004252
Dent Mater J. 2016;35(4):613-20
pubmed: 27477227
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42 Suppl 1:S53-9
pubmed: 24993856
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42 Suppl 1:S30-8
pubmed: 24993853
Caries Res. 2019;53(3):305-313
pubmed: 30359980
Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:100-7
pubmed: 23817063
Caries Res. 2020;54(1):2-6
pubmed: 31610535
Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:88-99
pubmed: 23817062
J Dent. 2020 Jan;92:103247
pubmed: 31743693
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42 Suppl 1:S39-45
pubmed: 24993854
J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:62-67
pubmed: 27650640
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42 Suppl 1:S21-9
pubmed: 24993852
Caries Res. 2011;45 Suppl 1:69-77
pubmed: 21625135
J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:45-9
pubmed: 27396612
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42 Suppl 1:S2-11
pubmed: 24993851
Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Aug;66(4):231-5
pubmed: 18622830
Dent Mater. 2018 Feb;34(2):355-362
pubmed: 29179970
Int Dent J. 2008 Feb;58(1):23-8
pubmed: 18350850
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2(4):383-8
pubmed: 16296257
Caries Res. 2013;47(6):574-81
pubmed: 23969953
Caries Res. 2011;45(6):581-9
pubmed: 22156703
Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:1-15
pubmed: 24993253
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jan 1;9(1):e118-e122
pubmed: 28149475
Int Dent J. 1991 Jun;41(3):164-70
pubmed: 1860723
Braz Oral Res. 2014;28 Spec No:1-6
pubmed: 24554098
Caries Res. 2017;51(1):52-57
pubmed: 27992868
J Dent. 2017 Apr;59:78-85
pubmed: 28232081
Int Dent J. 2017 Dec;67(6):344-350
pubmed: 28574173