Effects of feeding a live yeast on rumen fermentation and fiber degradability of tropical and subtropical forages.
Animal Feed
/ analysis
Animals
Cattle
/ metabolism
Dietary Fiber
/ metabolism
Dietary Supplements
/ analysis
Fermentation
Medicago sativa
/ metabolism
Poaceae
/ metabolism
Probiotics
/ administration & dosage
Rumen
/ metabolism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
/ metabolism
Saccharum
/ metabolism
Silage
/ analysis
Zea mays
/ metabolism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
cell wall
lactic acid
rumen metabolomics
Journal
Journal of the science of food and agriculture
ISSN: 1097-0010
Titre abrégé: J Sci Food Agric
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
revised:
21
04
2021
received:
05
12
2020
accepted:
28
04
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
entrez:
29
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effect of live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CNCM I-1077 (SC) on the ruminal degradability of different forages commonly found in dairy diets in South America was evaluated. We also assessed if SC supplementation interacts with forage group to affect ruminal fiber degradability. Four non-lactating rumen-cannulated Holstein cows were randomly assigned to two treatment sequences: Control-SC-Control or SC-Control-SC, in a switchback design, with three 30-day periods. Cows in the SC treatment were supplied with 1 × 10 Cows supplemented with SC had higher (P = 0.05) counts of yeasts and lower (P = 0.03) concentration of lactate in rumen fluid. There was no interaction between forage group and yeast supplementation (P > 0.10) on in situ degradability. The SC increased DM (by 4.6%) and aNDF degradation (by 10.3%) at 24 h of incubation (P < 0.05). Metabolomics revealed that a chemical entity (C The SC supplementation improved DM and aNDF degradability regardless of the forage group. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The effect of live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CNCM I-1077 (SC) on the ruminal degradability of different forages commonly found in dairy diets in South America was evaluated. We also assessed if SC supplementation interacts with forage group to affect ruminal fiber degradability. Four non-lactating rumen-cannulated Holstein cows were randomly assigned to two treatment sequences: Control-SC-Control or SC-Control-SC, in a switchback design, with three 30-day periods. Cows in the SC treatment were supplied with 1 × 10
RESULTS
RESULTS
Cows supplemented with SC had higher (P = 0.05) counts of yeasts and lower (P = 0.03) concentration of lactate in rumen fluid. There was no interaction between forage group and yeast supplementation (P > 0.10) on in situ degradability. The SC increased DM (by 4.6%) and aNDF degradation (by 10.3%) at 24 h of incubation (P < 0.05). Metabolomics revealed that a chemical entity (C
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The SC supplementation improved DM and aNDF degradability regardless of the forage group. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Substances chimiques
Dietary Fiber
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6220-6227Subventions
Organisme : Lallemand SAS
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Mertens DR, Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 80:1463-1481 (1997).
Huhtanen P, Nousiainen J and Rinne M, Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agric Food Sci 15:293-323 (2006).
Mertens DR, Regulation of forage intake, in Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization, ed. by Fahey GC Jr. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 450-493 (1994).
Allen MS, Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 83:1598-1624 (2000).
Wilson JR, Deinum B and Engels FM, Temperature effects on anatomy and digestibility of leaf and stem of tropical and temperate forage species. Neth J Agr Sci 39:31-48 (1991).
Moore KJ and Jung HJG, Lignin and fiber digestion. J Range Manage 54:420-430 (2001).
Crasta OR and Cox WJ, Temperature and soil water effects on maize growth, development yield, and forage quality. Crop Sci 36:341-348 (1996).
Cone JW and Engels FM, Influence of growth temperature on anatomy and in vitro digestibility of maize tissues. J Agric Sci 114:207-212 (1990).
Arriola KG, Oliveira AS, Ma ZX, Lean IJ, Giurcanu MC and Adesogan AT, A meta-analysis on the effect of dietary application of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on the performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 100:4513-4527 (2017).
Klopfenstein T, Chemical treatment of crop residues. J Anim Sci 46:841-848 (1978).
Chaudhry A, Rumen degradation in sacco in sheep of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide plus hydrogen peroxide. Anim Feed Sci Technol 83:313-323 (2000).
Wallace RJ, Ruminal microbiology, biotechnology and ruminant nutrition: progress and problems. J Anim Sci 72:2992-3003 (1994).
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Ameilbonne A, Walker ND, Mosoni P and Forano E, Effect of a live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae I-1077 on in situ ruminal degradation of alfalfa hay and fibre-associated microorganisms. J Anim Sci 88:145 (2010).
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Ameilbonne A, Bichat A, Mosoni P, Ossa F and Forano E, Live yeasts enhance fibre degradation in the cow rumen through an increase in plant substrate colonisation by fibrolytic bacteria and fungi. J Appl Microbiol 120:560-570 (2016).
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND and Bach A, Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: past, present and future. Anim Feed Sci Technol 145:5-26 (2008).
De Ondarza MB, Sniffen CJ, Dussert L, Chevaux E, Sullivan J and Walker N, Case study: mutiple-study analysis of the effect of live yeast on milk yield, milk component content and yield and feed efficiency. Prof Anim Sci 26:661-666 (2010).
Mosoni P, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Béra-Maillet C and Forano E, Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive. J Appl Microbiol 103:2676-2685 (2007).
Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C and Sauvant D, Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. J Dairy Sci 92:1620-1632 (2009).
Chaucheyras-Durand F and Fonty G, Establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and development of fermentative activities in the rumen of gnotobiotically-reared lambs receiving the microbial additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077. Reprod Nutr Dev 41:57-68 (2001).
Cabrera EJI, Mendoza MGD, Aranda IE, Garcia-Bojalil C, Bárcena GR and Ramos JJA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and nitrogenous supplementation in growing steers grazing tropical pastures. Anim Feed Sci Technol 83:49-55 (2000).
Sousa DO, Oliveira CA, Mari LJ, Chevaux E, Velasquez AV, Souza JM et al., Live yeast supplementation improves rumen fibre degradation in cattle grazing tropical pastures throughout the year. Anim Feed Sci Technol 236:149-158 (2018).
Krizsan SJ, Ahvenjarvi S and Huhtanen P, A meta-analysis of passage rate estimated by rumen evacuation with cattle and evaluation of passage rate prediction models. J Dairy Sci 93:5890-5901 (2010).
Association of Official Analytical Chemists - AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc, Arlington, VA (1990).
Mertens DR, Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85:1217-1240 (2002).
Huhtanen P, Kaustell K and Jaakkola S, The use of internal markers to predict total digestibility and duodenal flow of nutrients in cattle given six different diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48:211-227 (1994).
Van Soest PJ, Collaborative study of acid-detergent fiber and lignin. J AOAC Int 56:781-784 (1973).
Hall MB, Determination of dietary starch in animal feeds and pet food by an enzymatic-colorimetric method: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 98:397-409 (2015).
Chaney AL and Marbach EP, Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 8:130-137 (1962).
Pryce JD, A modification of Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid. Analyst 94:1151-1152 (1969).
Wang M, Carver J, Phelan V, Sanchez LM, Garg N, Peng Y et al., Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with global natural products social molecular networking. Nat Biotechnol 34:828-837 (2016).
SAS Institute Inc, Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide, 5th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC (2015).
Marden JP, Julien C, Monteils V, Auclair E, Moncoulon R and Bayourthe C, How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high-yielding dairy cows? J Dairy Sci 91:3528-3535 (2008).
Williams PE, Tait CA, Innes GM and Newbold CJ, Effects of the inclusion of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae plus growth medium) in the diet of dairy cows on milk yield and forage degradation and fermentation patterns in the rumen of steers. J Anim Sci 69:3016-3026 (1991).
Chaucheyras F, Fonty G, Gouet P, Bertin G and Salmon JM, Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell® SC), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism in vitro. J Anim Sci 42:927-933 (1996).
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Masséglia S and Fonty G, Effect of the microbial feed additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 on protein and peptide degrading activities of rumen bacteria grown in vitro. Curr Microbiol 50:96-101 (2005).
Guedes CM, Gonçalves D, Rodrigues MAM and Dias-da-Silva A, Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fiber degradation of maize silages in cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 145:27-40 (2008).
Jouany JP, Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Anim Reprod Sci 96:250-264 (2006).
Salvati GG, Morais Júnior NN, Melo AC, Vilela RR, Cardoso FF, Aronovich M et al., Response of lactating cows to live yeast supplementation during summer. J Dairy Sci 98:4062-4073 (2015).
Dias JDL, Silva RB, Fernandes T, Barbosa EF, Graças LEC, Araujo RC et al., Yeast culture increased plasma niacin concentration, evaporative heat loss, and feed efficiency of dairy cows in a hot environment. J Dairy Sci 101:5924-5936 (2018).
Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ and McIntosh FM, Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants. Br J Nutr 76:249-261 (1996).
Moya D, Ferret A, Blanch M, Fuentes MC, Fandiño JL and Calsamiglia S, Effects of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and type of cereal on rumen microbial fermentation in a dual flow continuous culture fermentation system. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 102:1488-1496 (2018).
Harrison GA, Dawson KA, Barker KB, Harmon RJ and Hemken RW, Influence of addition of yeast culture supplement to diets of lactating cows on ruminal fermentation and microbial populations. J Dairy Sci 71:2967-2975 (1988).
Erasmus LJ, Botha PM and Kistner A, Effect of yeast culture supplement on production, rumen fermentation, and duodenal nitrogen flow in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 75:3056-3065 (1992).
Russell JB and Wallace RJ, Energy yielding and consuming reactions, in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 185-215 (1988).
Mackie RI, Gilchrist FM and Heath S, An in vivo study of ruminal microorganisms influencing lactate turnover and its contribution to volatile fatty acid production. J Agric Sci 103:37-51 (1984).
Gray FV, Pilgrim AF, Rodda HJ and Weller RA, The nature and origin of the volatile fatty acids in the rumen of the sheep. J Exp Biol 29:57-68 (1952).
Wolin MJ and Miller TL, Microbe-microbe interaction, in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 343-361 (1988).
Ellis WC, Mahlooji M and Matis JH, Models for estimating parameters of neutral detergent fiber digestion by ruminal microorganisms. J Anim Sci 83:1591-1601 (2005).
Huhtanen P, Seppälä A, Ahvenjärvi S and Rinne M, Prediction of in vivo neutral detergent fiber digestibility and digestion rate of potentially digestible neutral detergent fiber: comparison of models. J Anim Sci 86:2657-2669 (2008).
Raffrenato E, Nicholson CF and Van Amburgh ME, Development of a mathematical model to predict pool sizes and rates of digestion of 2 pools of digestible neutral detergent fiber and an undigested neutral detergent fiber fraction within various forages. J Dairy Sci 102:351-364 (2019).
Girard ID and Dawson KA, Stimulation of ruminal bacteria by different fractions derived from cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain 1026. J Anim Sci 73:264 (1995).
Callaway ES and Martin SA, Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J Dairy Sci 80:2035-2044 (1997).
Artegoitia VM, Foote AP, Lewis RM and Freetly HC, Rumen fluid metabolomics analysis associated with feed efficiency on crossbred steers. Sci Rep 7:2864 (2017).
Li YQ, Xi YM, Wang ZD, Zeng HF and Han ZY, Combined signature of rumen microbiome and metabolome in dairy cows with different feed intake levels. J Anim Sci 98:skaa070 (2020).