Semi-automatic vessel detection for challenging cases of peripheral arterial disease.
Active contours without edges
Angiography
Blood vessel segmentation
Vessel tracking
Journal
Computers in biology and medicine
ISSN: 1879-0534
Titre abrégé: Comput Biol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1250250
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
09
12
2020
revised:
26
02
2021
accepted:
12
03
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
29
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Manual or semi-automated segmentation of the lower extremity arterial tree in patients with Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains a notoriously difficult and time-consuming task. The complex manifestations of the disease, including discontinuities of the vascular flow channels, the presence of calcified atherosclerotic plaque in close vicinity to adjacent bone, and the presence of metal or other imaging artifacts currently preclude fully automated vessel identification. New machine learning techniques may alleviate this challenge, but require large and reasonably well segmented training data. We propose a novel semi-automatic vessel tracking approach for peripheral arteries to facilitate and accelerate the creation of annotated training data by expert cardiovascular radiologists or technologists, while limiting the number of necessary manual interactions, and reducing processing time. After automatically classifying blood vessels, bones, and other tissue, the relevant vessels are tracked and organized in a tree-like structure for further visualization. We conducted a pilot (N = 9) and a clinical study (N = 24) in which we assess the accuracy and required time for our approach to achieve sufficient quality for clinical application, with our current clinically established workflow as the standard of reference. Our approach enabled expert physicians to readily identify all clinically relevant lower extremity arteries, even in problematic cases, with an average sensitivity of 92.9%, and an average specificity and overall accuracy of 99.9%. Compared to the clinical workflow in our collaborating hospitals (28:40 ± 7:45 [mm:ss]), our approach (17:24 ± 6:44 [mm:ss]) is on average 11:16 [mm:ss] (39%) faster.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33915360
pii: S0010-4825(21)00138-4
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104344
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104344Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.