A Novel Two-Lipid Signature Is a Strong and Independent Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Cancer.
biomarker
ceramide
lipid
lipidomics
outcome
ovarian cancer
patient stratification
personalized medicine
phospholipid
plasmalogen
prognosis
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Apr 2021
07 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
23
02
2021
revised:
30
03
2021
accepted:
03
04
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) generally responds well to oncological treatments, but the eventual development of a refractory disease is a major clinical problem. Presently, there are no prognostic blood-based biomarkers for the stratification of EOC patients at the time of diagnosis. We set out to assess and validate the prognostic utility of a novel two-lipid signature, as the lipidome is known to be markedly aberrant in EOC patients. The study consisted of 499 women with histologically confirmed EOC that were prospectively recruited at the university hospitals in Turku (Finland) and Charité (Berlin, Germany). Lipidomic screening by tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed for all baseline serum samples of these patients, and additionally for 20 patients of the Turku cohort at various timepoints. A two-lipid signature, based on the ratio of the ceramide Cer(d18:1/18:0) and phosphatidylcholine PC(O-38:4), showed consistent prognostic performance in all investigated study cohorts. In the Turku cohort, the unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) per standard deviation (SD) (95% confidence interval) were 1.79 (1.40, 2.29) for overall and 1.40 (1.14, 1.71) for progression-free survival. In a Charité cohort incorporating only stage III completely resected patients, the corresponding HRs were 1.59 (1.08, 2.35) and 1.53 (1.02, 2.30). In linear-mixed models predicting progression of the disease, the two-lipid signature showed higher performance (beta per SD increase 1.99 (1.38, 2.97)) than cancer antigen 125 (CA-125, 1.78 (1.13, 2.87)). The two-lipid signature was able to identify EOC patients with an especially poor prognosis at the time of diagnosis, and also showed promise for the detection of disease relapse.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33917079
pii: cancers13081764
doi: 10.3390/cancers13081764
pmc: PMC8067677
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May 2;:
pubmed: 31048403
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Int J Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;141(10):2112-2120
pubmed: 28741687
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 17;10(1):2757
pubmed: 32066851
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 26;8(61):102912-102922
pubmed: 29262533
J Lipid Res. 2013 Oct;54(10):2898-908
pubmed: 23868910
Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;115(6):1234-44
pubmed: 19189349
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):822-832
pubmed: 30811909
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 May;408(13):3475-83
pubmed: 26922344
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi24-32
pubmed: 24078660
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 15;24(4):777-783
pubmed: 29191972
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):77-85
pubmed: 16394043
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018 Aug;80(2):e12975
pubmed: 29781548
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 01;37(25):1967-76
pubmed: 27125947
Int J Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;136(3):516-26
pubmed: 24895217
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Apr 10;14(4):7742-56
pubmed: 23574936
Lipids Health Dis. 2018 Mar 7;17(1):41
pubmed: 29514688
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):284-296
pubmed: 29809280
J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497-509
pubmed: 13428781
Curr Drug Targets. 2008 Aug;9(8):662-73
pubmed: 18691013
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Feb;21(2):419-23
pubmed: 21270624
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):2081-2092
pubmed: 27797973
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 10:x53-x58
pubmed: 24265406
Clin Transl Med. 2018 Jul 30;7(1):21
pubmed: 30058036
Oncotarget. 2019 Mar 15;10(22):2161-2172
pubmed: 31040908
Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 15;76(4):796-804
pubmed: 26685161
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):371-380
pubmed: 31209498
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Nov 26;11(12):
pubmed: 31769430
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Nov 28;17(12):
pubmed: 27916803
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;7(6):335-9
pubmed: 20368726
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):689-694
pubmed: 31889528