Electromyography-Guided Adjustment of an Occlusal Appliance: Effect on Pain Perceptions Related with Temporomandibular Disorders. A Controlled Clinical Study.
electromyography
muscle pain
occlusal appliance
removable appliance
temporomandibular joint disorders
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Apr 2021
08 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
15
03
2021
revised:
06
04
2021
accepted:
06
04
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an electromyography-guided adjustment of an occlusal appliance on the management of Temporomandibular disorder-related pain. Data from 40 adult patients (20 males and 20 females), who underwent treatment with occlusal appliances, were recorded. A total of 20 appliances were adjusted according to electromyographic data (group 1), while the others were adjusted by a clinical conventional procedure (group 2). Muscle pain to palpation, pain during articular movements and headache were recorded by a VAS score (from 0 to 100) before the beginning of treatment (T0), at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks). Results showed a reduction of pain in both groups, with a better trend for group 1, where better results were achieved at T1 and maintained stability at T2, with an improved mean value regarding all parameters studied. After 8 weeks, only small recurrences started to occur in muscle pain to palpation in group 2. An occlusal appliance seems to be able to achieve a clinical improvement of Temporomandibular disorder (TMD)-related pain and headache, independently from the adjustment procedure adopted. However, the use of a surface electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles (sEMG) device as an aid in the calibration procedure seems to allow a better trend because the improvement of symptoms was obtained before, after the first four weeks, with an improvement in percentages of all the variables investigated. While the conventional procedure obtained later the improvement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an electromyography-guided adjustment of an occlusal appliance on the management of Temporomandibular disorder-related pain.
METHODS
METHODS
Data from 40 adult patients (20 males and 20 females), who underwent treatment with occlusal appliances, were recorded. A total of 20 appliances were adjusted according to electromyographic data (group 1), while the others were adjusted by a clinical conventional procedure (group 2). Muscle pain to palpation, pain during articular movements and headache were recorded by a VAS score (from 0 to 100) before the beginning of treatment (T0), at T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 weeks).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Results showed a reduction of pain in both groups, with a better trend for group 1, where better results were achieved at T1 and maintained stability at T2, with an improved mean value regarding all parameters studied. After 8 weeks, only small recurrences started to occur in muscle pain to palpation in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
An occlusal appliance seems to be able to achieve a clinical improvement of Temporomandibular disorder (TMD)-related pain and headache, independently from the adjustment procedure adopted. However, the use of a surface electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles (sEMG) device as an aid in the calibration procedure seems to allow a better trend because the improvement of symptoms was obtained before, after the first four weeks, with an improvement in percentages of all the variables investigated. While the conventional procedure obtained later the improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33917788
pii: diagnostics11040667
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040667
pmc: PMC8068158
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun;13(2):536-42
pubmed: 24984678
Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Apr;63(2):99-109
pubmed: 16134549
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Mar;18(3):400
pubmed: 24500638
Cranio. 2012 Jul;30(3):218-26
pubmed: 22916675
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 May;83(5):522-6
pubmed: 22606870
Cranio. 2004 Jul;22(3):209-19
pubmed: 15293777
Braz Dent J. 2017 May-Jun;28(3):324-329
pubmed: 29297553
BMC Res Notes. 2010 May 25;3:141
pubmed: 20500818
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 May;33(5):341-8
pubmed: 16629892
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Feb;29(1):45-51
pubmed: 16957058
J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Feb;32(2):79-84
pubmed: 15641971
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Apr;22(2):266-72
pubmed: 22206640
Quintessence Int. 2015 Apr;46(4):341-9
pubmed: 25386633
Gen Dent. 2016 Nov-Dec;64(6):29-36
pubmed: 27814253
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Sep;38(9):648-54
pubmed: 21332571
Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):511-7
pubmed: 9021318
Cranio. 2019 Mar;37(2):77-84
pubmed: 29072541
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 06;11(3):
pubmed: 33800948
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Dec;21(6):885-92
pubmed: 21889363
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):212-23
pubmed: 19138639
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27
pubmed: 24482784