The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for Intravitreal Injections (ICO-OSCAR:IVI).

ICO-OSCAR assessment education intravitreal injections rubric

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 02 03 2021
revised: 25 03 2021
accepted: 30 03 2021
entrez: 30 4 2021
pubmed: 1 5 2021
medline: 1 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

(1) Background: Intravitreal injections (IVIs) are the most commonly performed intraocular procedure worldwide. Ensuring correct learning is essential to avoid complications. Our purpose was to develop an internationally valid tool to assess skill in performing IVIs. (2) Methods: A panel of six content experts designed a rubric for assessing the IVI procedure by using a modified Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition, dividing it into steps and providing objective behavioral descriptors for each level of skill in each category, following the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) guidance. The rubric draft was then critically reviewed by 12 international content experts, and their constructive comments were considered for the final rubric. (3) Results: The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for IVI (ICO-OSCAR:IVI) is the proposed tool for assessing healthcare professionals training to perform IVI. (4) Conclusions: The ICO-OSCAR:IVI is the result of the consensus of an international expert panel. The methodology used for its development provides this rubric with face and content validity. It can be used globally to assess healthcare professionals training to perform IVI, as well as the impact of different teaching methods on performance. Further studies are required to establish intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as the predictive validity of this tool.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33918330
pii: jcm10071476
doi: 10.3390/jcm10071476
pmc: PMC8038170
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 28;10:1205-8
pubmed: 27418803
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Feb;2(2):162-167
pubmed: 31047343
Ophthalmologica. 2018;239(4):181-193
pubmed: 29393226
Retina. 2017 Sep;37(9):1797-1804
pubmed: 28613227
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec;113(12):1479-96
pubmed: 7487614
Retina. 2009 Feb;29(2):251-6
pubmed: 18854786
Eye (Lond). 2013 Jul;27(7):787-94
pubmed: 23722722
Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;53(2):145-149
pubmed: 29631826
J AAPOS. 2012 Aug;16(4):318-21
pubmed: 22929445
Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):427.e1-5
pubmed: 21292117
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013 Sep;111:24-33
pubmed: 24072944
J Glaucoma. 2017 Sep;26(9):805-809
pubmed: 28719416

Auteurs

Sieh Yean Kiew (SY)

Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Academic Clinical Programme for Ophthalmology, Singapore 169856, Singapore.

Ian Yew San Yeo (IYS)

Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Academic Clinical Programme for Ophthalmology, Singapore 169856, Singapore.

Karl C Golnik (KC)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati, The Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45242, USA.

María A Muriel-Herrero (MA)

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

Vanesa Fuertes-Barahona (V)

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

Andrzej Grzybowski (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.
Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, 60-836 Poznan, Poland.

Classifications MeSH