Environmental Cadmium Exposure and Dental Indices in Orthodontic Patients.
cadmium
dental caries
exposure
orthodontic
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Apr 2021
02 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
06
02
2021
revised:
27
03
2021
accepted:
31
03
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have shown that environmental cadmium exposure could disrupt salivary gland function and is associated with dental caries and reduced bone density. Therefore, this cross-sectional study attempted to determine whether tooth decay with tooth loss following cadmium exposure is associated with some dental or skeletal traits such as malocclusions, sagittal skeletal pattern, and tooth decay. Between August 2019 and June 2020, 60 orthodontic patients with no history of previous orthodontics, functional appliances, or surgical treatment were examined. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their urine cadmium concentrations: high (>1.06 µg/g creatinine, The patients were 25.07 ± 4.33 years old, and most were female (female/male: 51/9 or 85%). The skeletal relationship was mainly Class I (48.3%), followed by Class II (35.0%) and Class III (16.7%). Class I molar relationships were found in 46.7% of these patients, Class II molar relationships were found in 15%, and Class III molar relationships were found in 38.3%. The mean decayed, missing, and filled surface (DMFS) score was 8.05 ± 5.54, including 2.03 ± 3.11 for the decayed index, 0.58 ± 1.17 for the missing index, and 5.52 ± 3.92 for the filled index. The mean index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) score was 53.35 ± 9.01. The facial patterns of these patients were within the average low margin (26.65 ± 5.53 for Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA)). There were no significant differences in the above-mentioned dental indices between patients with high urine cadmium concentrations and those with low urine cadmium concentrations. Patients were further stratified into low (<27, This analysis found no association between environmental cadmium exposure and dental indices in our orthodontic patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have shown that environmental cadmium exposure could disrupt salivary gland function and is associated with dental caries and reduced bone density. Therefore, this cross-sectional study attempted to determine whether tooth decay with tooth loss following cadmium exposure is associated with some dental or skeletal traits such as malocclusions, sagittal skeletal pattern, and tooth decay.
METHODS
METHODS
Between August 2019 and June 2020, 60 orthodontic patients with no history of previous orthodontics, functional appliances, or surgical treatment were examined. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their urine cadmium concentrations: high (>1.06 µg/g creatinine,
RESULTS
RESULTS
The patients were 25.07 ± 4.33 years old, and most were female (female/male: 51/9 or 85%). The skeletal relationship was mainly Class I (48.3%), followed by Class II (35.0%) and Class III (16.7%). Class I molar relationships were found in 46.7% of these patients, Class II molar relationships were found in 15%, and Class III molar relationships were found in 38.3%. The mean decayed, missing, and filled surface (DMFS) score was 8.05 ± 5.54, including 2.03 ± 3.11 for the decayed index, 0.58 ± 1.17 for the missing index, and 5.52 ± 3.92 for the filled index. The mean index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) score was 53.35 ± 9.01. The facial patterns of these patients were within the average low margin (26.65 ± 5.53 for Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA)). There were no significant differences in the above-mentioned dental indices between patients with high urine cadmium concentrations and those with low urine cadmium concentrations. Patients were further stratified into low (<27,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis found no association between environmental cadmium exposure and dental indices in our orthodontic patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33918500
pii: healthcare9040413
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040413
pmc: PMC8066373
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
ID : CMRP3J0881, CMRP3J0882
Références
Zdr Varst. 2018 Oct 01;57(4):218-226
pubmed: 30294363
Toxicol Lett. 2003 Jan 31;137(1-2):65-83
pubmed: 12505433
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 31;8(36):60469-60478
pubmed: 28947985
Mod Pathol. 2013 Sep;26(9):1228-34
pubmed: 23558578
Am J Orthod. 1971 Nov;60(5):505-17
pubmed: 5286677
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Feb 09;9:249-56
pubmed: 25709410
Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):51-9
pubmed: 17208642
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;45(6):1004-1009
pubmed: 28438395
Environ Res. 2005 Jan;97(1):83-92
pubmed: 15476737
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 19;99(4):2258-63
pubmed: 11854521
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24 Suppl 1:1-51
pubmed: 9569444
Prog Orthod. 2012 Nov;13(3):314-25
pubmed: 23260543
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Aug;63(8):545-50
pubmed: 16601012
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):
pubmed: 32466586
Toxicol Lett. 2003 Jan 13;136(3):183-92
pubmed: 12505271
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Aug 01;24(3):44.e1-44.e9
pubmed: 31390447
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):10-13
pubmed: 28377647
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2006 Summer;111(1-3):53-62
pubmed: 16943597
Am J Orthod. 1948 Oct;34(10):812-40
pubmed: 18882558
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17 Suppl 2:35-9
pubmed: 11904357
Angle Orthod. 2002 Feb;72(1):15-20
pubmed: 11858159
Am J Orthod. 1967 Apr;53(4):262-84
pubmed: 5227460
Am J Orthod. 1966 Nov;52(11):804-22
pubmed: 5223046
Arch Oral Biol. 1989;34(12):999-1002
pubmed: 2482021
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Apr;123(4):395-400
pubmed: 12695766
Arch Environ Health. 1982 Mar-Apr;37(2):98-102
pubmed: 7073331
Dent Clin North Am. 1999 Oct;43(4):579-97
pubmed: 10553245
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;24(1):17-20
pubmed: 8833508
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2016 Dec 12;11:56
pubmed: 27999610
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):808-817
pubmed: 29853238
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;29(6):1014-24
pubmed: 11101542
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):e263-72
pubmed: 22133960
Stem Cells. 2005;23(1):44-54
pubmed: 15625121
Acta Vet Scand. 2014 Sep 24;56:64
pubmed: 25279860
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;135C(3):331-6
pubmed: 12927907
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4635-40
pubmed: 9539790
Am J Orthod. 1977 Oct;72(4):373-85
pubmed: 269666
Pharmacol Res. 2000 Dec;42(6):591-7
pubmed: 11058413
Prog Orthod. 2011 Nov;12(2):132-42
pubmed: 22074838
Am J Orthod. 1971 Aug;60(2):111-27
pubmed: 5283996
Implant Dent. 2017 Feb;26(1):112-120
pubmed: 28114243
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 May;45(5):1514-22
pubmed: 15111610
Environ Health Perspect. 1980 Feb;34:219-21
pubmed: 7389686
East Mediterr Health J. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):110-8
pubmed: 18557458
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jun;116(6):821-5
pubmed: 18560540
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1991 Sep 1;110(2):355-63
pubmed: 1654000
Bone. 2004 Nov;35(5):1180-91
pubmed: 15542044
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Feb;28(1):58-64
pubmed: 16278225
Neurotoxicology. 1983 Winter;4(4):69-83
pubmed: 6322059
Blood. 2003 Mar 15;101(6):2215-8
pubmed: 12433693
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):233-8
pubmed: 21803261
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001 Jul;12(7):1401-9
pubmed: 11423569
Am J Orthod. 1969 Jun;55(6):651-7
pubmed: 5253959
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Mar;26(3):998-1005
pubmed: 20667996
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):489.e9-14
pubmed: 18405809
Biometals. 2004 Oct;17(5):499-503
pubmed: 15688853
J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9733-43
pubmed: 11739582
Iran J Public Health. 2019 Nov;48(11):2050-2057
pubmed: 31970104
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2016 Dec;3(4):450-458
pubmed: 27696280
Implant Dent. 2014 Feb;23(1):92-7
pubmed: 24398849
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):366-72
pubmed: 15014417
Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):897-901
pubmed: 12665832