Does Head Orientation Influence 3D Facial Imaging? A Study on Accuracy and Precision of Stereophotogrammetric Acquisition.

3D imaging anthropometry dentistry craniofacial morphology head position non-invasive imaging orthodontics stereophotogrammetry

Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 04 2021
Historique:
received: 21 03 2021
revised: 15 04 2021
accepted: 15 04 2021
entrez: 30 4 2021
pubmed: 1 5 2021
medline: 22 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study investigates the reliability and precision of anthropometric measurements collected from 3D images and acquired under different conditions of head rotation. Various sources of error were examined, and the equivalence between craniofacial data generated from alternative head positions was assessed. 3D captures of a mannequin head were obtained with a stereophotogrammetric system (Face Shape 3D MaxiLine). Image acquisition was performed with no rotations and with various pitch, roll, and yaw angulations. On 3D images, 14 linear distances were measured. Various indices were used to quantify error magnitude, among them the acquisition error, the mean and the maximum intra- and inter-operator measurement error, repeatability and reproducibility error, the standard deviation, and the standard error of errors. Two one-sided tests (TOST) were performed to assess the equivalence between measurements recorded in different head angulations. The maximum intra-operator error was very low (0.336 mm), closely followed by the acquisition error (0.496 mm). The maximum inter-operator error was 0.532 mm, and the highest degree of error was found in reproducibility (0.890 mm). Anthropometric measurements from alternative acquisition conditions resulted in significantly equivalent TOST, with the exception of Zygion (l)-Tragion (l) and Cheek (l)-Tragion (l) distances measured with pitch angulation compared to no rotation position. Face Shape 3D Maxiline has sufficient accuracy for orthodontic and surgical use. Precision was not altered by head orientation, making the acquisition simpler and not constrained to a critical precision as in 2D photographs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33920674
pii: ijerph18084276
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084276
pmc: PMC8073202
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Sep;40(5):523-9
pubmed: 12943434
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Oct 15;138A(3):247-53
pubmed: 16158436
Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17(1):75-82
pubmed: 24791467
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Sep;106(3):257-64
pubmed: 8074090
Oral Radiol. 2017;33(3):212-218
pubmed: 28890606
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):672-81
pubmed: 24182583
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;54(3):233-40
pubmed: 26896079
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 May;21(3):763-7
pubmed: 20485043
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Nov;46(11):1512-1516
pubmed: 28521964
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 13;10(6):
pubmed: 33805774
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):1004-1009
pubmed: 27023408
J Autom Methods Manag Chem. 2003;25(6):123-7
pubmed: 18924621
Minerva Stomatol. 2018 Aug;67(4):165-171
pubmed: 29527867
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Sep 10;201(1-3):125-32
pubmed: 20395086
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jun;97(6):489-94
pubmed: 2353678
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Feb 15;27(1):5-13
pubmed: 28392720
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;36(2):109-16
pubmed: 18280173
Int J Dent. 2013;2013:690265
pubmed: 24082882
Int J Med Robot. 2007 Jun;3(2):97-110
pubmed: 17619242
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;40(4):341-52
pubmed: 21095103
J Anthropol Sci. 2013;91:159-84
pubmed: 23833019
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):82-5
pubmed: 10393584
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2011 Feb 02;8(1):1
pubmed: 21288353
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004 Sep;41(5):507-18
pubmed: 15352857
Eur J Orthod. 2002 Oct;24(5):457-70
pubmed: 12407941
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;47(1):179-184
pubmed: 30527381
HNO. 2005 Feb;53(2):148-54
pubmed: 15221084
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan;45(1):8-12
pubmed: 28011182

Auteurs

Giuditta Battistoni (G)

Section of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Diana Cassi (D)

Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Science with Interest in Transplant Oncological and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.

Marisabel Magnifico (M)

Section of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Giuseppe Pedrazzi (G)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, Interdepartmental Centre of Robust Statistics (Ro.S.A.), University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Marco Di Blasio (M)

Section of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Benedetta Vaienti (B)

Section of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Alberto Di Blasio (A)

Section of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Articles similaires

Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires
Adolescent Child Female Humans Male
Humans Scoliosis Mobile Applications Retrospective Studies Artificial Intelligence

Classifications MeSH