Radiation Enhancer Effect of Platinum Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Cell Lines: In Vitro and In Silico Analyses.
Apoptosis
Breast Neoplasms
/ metabolism
Cell Cycle
Cell Proliferation
Computer Simulation
Female
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Metal Nanoparticles
/ administration & dosage
Oxidative Stress
Platinum
/ chemistry
Radiation, Ionizing
Radiation-Sensitizing Agents
/ administration & dosage
Tumor Cells, Cultured
dose enhancement effect
ionizing radiation
platinum nanoparticle
radiation enhancement effect
radiation resistance
radiation sensitivity
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Apr 2021
23 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
17
03
2021
revised:
18
04
2021
accepted:
20
04
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High-Z metallic nanoparticles (NPs) are new players in the therapeutic arsenal against cancer, especially radioresistant cells. Indeed, the presence of these NPs inside malignant cells is believed to enhance the effect of ionizing radiation by locally increasing the dose deposition. In this context, the potential of platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs) as radiosensitizers was investigated in two breast cancer cell lines, T47D and MDA-MB-231, showing a different radiation sensitivity. PtNPs were internalized in the two cell lines and localized in lysosomes and multivesicular bodies. Analyses of cell responses in terms of clonogenicity, survival, mortality, cell-cycle distribution, oxidative stress, and DNA double-strand breaks did not reveal any significant enhancement effect when cells were pre-exposed to PtNPs before being irradiated, as compared to radiation alone. This result is different from that reported in a previous study performed, under the same conditions, on cervical cancer HeLa cells. This shows that the efficacy of radio-enhancement is strongly cell-type-dependent. Simulation of the early stage ionization processes, taking into account the irradiation characteristics and realistic physical parameters in the biological sample, indicated that PtNPs could weakly increase the dose deposition (by 3%) in the immediate vicinity of the nanoparticles. Some features that are potentially responsible for the biological effect could not be taken into account in the simulation. Thus, chemical and biological effects could explain this discrepancy. For instance, we showed that, in these breast cancer cell lines, PtNPs exhibited ambivalent redox properties, with an antioxidant potential which could counteract the radio-enhancement effect. This work shows that the efficacy of PtNPs for enhancing radiation effects is strongly cell-dependent and that no effect is observed in the case of the breast cancer cell lines T47D and MDA-MB-231. Thus, more extensive experiments using other relevant biological models are needed in order to evaluate such combined strategies, since several clinical trials have already demonstrated the success of combining nanoagents with radiotherapy in the treatment of a range of tumor types.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33922713
pii: ijms22094436
doi: 10.3390/ijms22094436
pmc: PMC8123015
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Radiation-Sensitizing Agents
0
Platinum
49DFR088MY
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
ID : Transverse Division n°4
Organisme : Université Paris-Saclay
ID : IRS NanoTheRad
Organisme : China Scholarship Council
ID : 201607040068
Organisme : Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche
ID : felllowship
Références
Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4299-4312
pubmed: 28543610
Nanoscale. 2016 Jan 7;8(1):581-9
pubmed: 26645621
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 29901835
Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2020 Aug 07;13:61-76
pubmed: 32848371
Phys Med. 2021 Mar 22;:
pubmed: 33766478
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 27;21(5):
pubmed: 32120829
Theranostics. 2018 Feb 12;8(7):1824-1849
pubmed: 29556359
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 30;20(3):
pubmed: 30704035
Sci Rep. 2011;1:18
pubmed: 22355537
Med Phys. 2018 May;45(5):2230-2242
pubmed: 29480947
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 12;20(22):
pubmed: 31718091
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):624-31
pubmed: 21452700
J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2012 Nov 1;116(43):23047-23052
pubmed: 23393610
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Sep 21;49(18):N309-15
pubmed: 15509078
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Sep;100(3):412-6
pubmed: 21924786
Apoptosis. 2014 Jun;19(6):1006-16
pubmed: 24687228
Nanotechnology. 2010 Feb 26;21(8):85103
pubmed: 20101074
J Pharmacol Sci. 2011;117(4):243-52
pubmed: 22083043
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 1;79(2):531-9
pubmed: 21095075
Radiat Res. 1986 May;106(2):252-70
pubmed: 3704115
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Dec 21;59(24):7675-89
pubmed: 25415297
Radiat Res. 2007 Mar;167(3):319-29
pubmed: 17316069
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):861-874
pubmed: 26653251
Int J Nanomedicine. 2016 Apr 15;11:1549-56
pubmed: 27143877
Int J Nanomedicine. 2020 May 29;15:3843-3850
pubmed: 32581534
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4692-708
pubmed: 20964188
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2020 Jan;203:111737
pubmed: 31862636
Cancer Nanotechnol. 2017;8(1):4
pubmed: 28757899
Langmuir. 2008 Jul 15;24(14):7354-64
pubmed: 18553993
J Radiat Res. 2017 Jul 1;58(4):405-411
pubmed: 28419319
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Nov 17;65(22):225017
pubmed: 32916674
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 07;64(15):155016
pubmed: 31300616
Nanomedicine. 2018 Feb;14(2):439-449
pubmed: 29196180
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 23;12(8):
pubmed: 32718058
Med Phys. 2010 Jul;37(7):3809-16
pubmed: 20831089
Br J Radiol. 2014 Sep;87(1041):20140134
pubmed: 24990037