Weekday-Weekend Sedentary Behavior and Recreational Screen Time Patterns in Families with Preschoolers, Schoolchildren, and Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Three Cohort Study.
daughter
father
mother
preschoolers
screen time
son
weekdays
weekends
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 04 2021
24 04 2021
Historique:
received:
18
03
2021
revised:
19
04
2021
accepted:
21
04
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
28
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Excessive recreational screen time (RST) has been associated with negative health consequences already being apparent in preschoolers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to reveal parent-child sedentary behavior, and RST patterns and associations with respect to the gender, age category of children, and days of the week. Our cross-sectional survey included 1175 parent-child dyads with proxy-reported RST data collected during a regular school week during the spring and fall between 2013 and 2019. The parent-child RST (age and RST) relationship was quantified using Pearson's (r Weekends were characterized by longer RST for all family members (daughters/sons: +34/+33 min/day, mothers/fathers: +43/+14 min/day) and closer parent-child RST associations than on weekdays. The increasing age of children was positively associated with an increase in RST on weekdays (+6.4/+7.2 min per year of age of the daughter/son) and weekends (+5.8/+7.5 min per year of age of the daughter/son). Weekends provide a suitable target for implementation of programs aimed at reducing excessive RST involving not only children, but preferably parent-child dyads.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Excessive recreational screen time (RST) has been associated with negative health consequences already being apparent in preschoolers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to reveal parent-child sedentary behavior, and RST patterns and associations with respect to the gender, age category of children, and days of the week.
METHODS
Our cross-sectional survey included 1175 parent-child dyads with proxy-reported RST data collected during a regular school week during the spring and fall between 2013 and 2019. The parent-child RST (age and RST) relationship was quantified using Pearson's (r
RESULTS
Weekends were characterized by longer RST for all family members (daughters/sons: +34/+33 min/day, mothers/fathers: +43/+14 min/day) and closer parent-child RST associations than on weekdays. The increasing age of children was positively associated with an increase in RST on weekdays (+6.4/+7.2 min per year of age of the daughter/son) and weekends (+5.8/+7.5 min per year of age of the daughter/son).
CONCLUSIONS
Weekends provide a suitable target for implementation of programs aimed at reducing excessive RST involving not only children, but preferably parent-child dyads.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33923313
pii: ijerph18094532
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094532
pmc: PMC8123206
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Sep;18(8):1158-1167
pubmed: 29792130
Med J Aust. 2006 Jan 16;184(2):64-7
pubmed: 16411870
Health Rep. 2016 Sep 21;27(9):3-13
pubmed: 27655167
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jul 14;11(7):7163-81
pubmed: 25026084
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e88486
pubmed: 24533092
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Apr;58(4):417-425
pubmed: 26827267
Can J Public Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;101(2):124-7
pubmed: 20524376
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jul 26;9:88
pubmed: 22835155
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 23;10:102
pubmed: 23967799
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jul 20;16:100
pubmed: 27439395
Pediatrics. 2013 Aug;132(2):e364-71
pubmed: 23858418
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 07;11(3):e0150580
pubmed: 26950063
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jun 16;8:62
pubmed: 21679426
Eat Behav. 2010 Dec;11(4):266-75
pubmed: 20850062
J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;202:157-162.e1
pubmed: 30100232
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 05;17(11):
pubmed: 32516925
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e032210
pubmed: 31852703
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Jun;22(6):684-688
pubmed: 30579814
BMC Public Health. 2013 Nov 25;13:1092
pubmed: 24274070
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S311-27
pubmed: 27306437
Nutrition. 2018 Nov;55-56:192-198
pubmed: 30121021
Circulation. 2018 Sep 11;138(11):e142-e159
pubmed: 30354382
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008;3(3):141-7
pubmed: 18608623
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2018 Jan;46(1):18-25
pubmed: 28885266
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Aug;37(4):753-72
pubmed: 22765839
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):150-8
pubmed: 22813679
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Feb;38(1):53-61
pubmed: 24485214
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S240-65
pubmed: 27306432
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 15;20(1):70
pubmed: 32061263
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2(4):211-7
pubmed: 17852553
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Jan;21(1):118-130
pubmed: 32154761
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0118303
pubmed: 25785738
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Dec;13(12):1310-1316
pubmed: 27633614
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 07;4(2):e003768
pubmed: 24508849
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Feb;17(2):282-91
pubmed: 22395818
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 16;17(1):74
pubmed: 32539730
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):1385
pubmed: 31660925
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Sep 21;8:98
pubmed: 21936895
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):49-56
pubmed: 22767966
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Mar;29(3):308-328
pubmed: 30456827
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Apr 23;11:54
pubmed: 24758143
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;17(Suppl 5):868
pubmed: 29219092
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):1119
pubmed: 32677940
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67627
pubmed: 23840753
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:265-287
pubmed: 31913771
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Oct;38(10):1317-23
pubmed: 24946910