The Effects of In-Plane Spatial Resolution on CT-Based Radiomic Features' Stability with and without ComBat Harmonization.
harmonization
image processing
radiomics biomarkers
reproducibility
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Apr 2021
13 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
26
03
2021
revised:
07
04
2021
accepted:
08
04
2021
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While handcrafted radiomic features (HRFs) have shown promise in the field of personalized medicine, many hurdles hinder its incorporation into clinical practice, including but not limited to their sensitivity to differences in acquisition and reconstruction parameters. In this study, we evaluated the effects of differences in in-plane spatial resolution (IPR) on HRFs, using a phantom dataset (n = 14) acquired on two scanner models. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of interpolation methods (IMs), the choice of a new unified in-plane resolution (NUIR), and ComBat harmonization on the reproducibility of HRFs. The reproducibility of HRFs was significantly affected by variations in IPR, with pairwise concordant HRFs, as measured by the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), ranging from 42% to 95%. The number of concordant HRFs (CCC > 0.9) after resampling varied depending on (i) the scanner model, (ii) the IM, and (iii) the NUIR. The number of concordant HRFs after ComBat harmonization depended on the variations between the batches harmonized. The majority of IMs resulted in a higher number of concordant HRFs compared to ComBat harmonization, and the combination of IMs and ComBat harmonization did not yield a significant benefit. Our developed framework can be used to assess the reproducibility and harmonizability of RFs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33924382
pii: cancers13081848
doi: 10.3390/cancers13081848
pmc: PMC8103509
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Acta Oncol. 2017 Nov;56(11):1544-1553
pubmed: 28885084
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77
pubmed: 26579733
Acta Radiol. 1995 Mar;36(2):127-35
pubmed: 7710790
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):53-59
pubmed: 30694160
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):111-26
pubmed: 11516706
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107
pubmed: 29092951
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Feb;3:1-9
pubmed: 30730766
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 24;10(1):10248
pubmed: 32581221
Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Sep;49(5):438-449
pubmed: 31470936
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57
pubmed: 23884657
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):407-415
pubmed: 29688159
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
pubmed: 16632515
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):2123-2128
pubmed: 29677066
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1983;2(1):31-9
pubmed: 18234586
Tomography. 2016 Dec;2(4):361-365
pubmed: 30042967
Med Phys. 2017 Mar;44(3):1050-1062
pubmed: 28112418
Respiration. 2020;99(2):99-107
pubmed: 31991420
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1234-48
pubmed: 22898692
J Nucl Med. 1998 Nov;39(11):1864-9
pubmed: 9829572
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1460-1470
pubmed: 32909055
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul 16;19:33-38
pubmed: 31417963
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-6
pubmed: 22257792
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1143-1158
pubmed: 30170872
Phys Med. 2018 Jan;45:59-64
pubmed: 29472091
Methods. 2021 Apr;188:20-29
pubmed: 32504782
Br J Radiol. 2020 Apr;93(1108):20190948
pubmed: 32101448
Invest Radiol. 2015 Nov;50(11):757-65
pubmed: 26115366
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010 Nov;5(6):463-6
pubmed: 20978388
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10545
pubmed: 30002441
Cancer Imaging. 2020 May 1;20(1):33
pubmed: 32357923
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1992 Sep;30(5):449-64
pubmed: 1293435
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4800
pubmed: 30886309
Front Neuroinform. 2013 Dec 30;7:45
pubmed: 24416015
Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68
pubmed: 2720055
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762
pubmed: 28975929
J Nucl Med. 2018 Aug;59(8):1321-1328
pubmed: 29301932