Going beyond 'regular and casual': development of a classification of sexual partner types to enhance partner notification for STIs.


Journal

Sexually transmitted infections
ISSN: 1472-3263
Titre abrégé: Sex Transm Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9805554

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 19 11 2020
revised: 03 02 2021
accepted: 27 02 2021
pubmed: 1 5 2021
medline: 3 3 2022
entrez: 30 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To develop a classification of sexual partner types for use in partner notification (PN) for STIs. A four-step process: (1) an iterative synthesis of five sources of evidence: scoping review of social and health sciences literature on partner types; analysis of relationship types in dating apps; systematic review of PN intervention content; and review of PN guidelines; qualitative interviews with public, patients and health professionals to generate an initial comprehensive classification; (2) multidisciplinary clinical expert consultation to revise the classification; (3) piloting of the revised classification in sexual health clinics during a randomised controlled trial of PN; (4) application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify index patients' willingness to engage in PN for each partner type. Five main partner types emerged from the evidence synthesis and consultation: 'established partner', 'new partner', 'occasional partner', 'one-off partner' and 'sex worker'. The types differed across several dimensions, including likely perceptions of sexual exclusivity, likelihood of sex reoccurring between index patient and sex partner. Sexual health professionals found the classification easy to operationalise. During the trial, they assigned all 3288 partners described by 2223 index patients to a category. The TDF analysis suggested that the partner types might be associated with different risks of STI reinfection, onward transmission and index patients' engagement with PN. We developed an evidence-informed, useable classification of five sexual partner types to underpin PN practice and other STI prevention interventions. Analysis of biomedical, psychological and social factors that distinguish different partner types shows how each could warrant a tailored PN approach. This classification could facilitate the use of partner-centred outcomes. Additional studies are needed to determine the utility of the classification to improve measurement of the impact of PN strategies and help focus resources.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33927009
pii: sextrans-2020-054846
doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054846
pmc: PMC8862076
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108-114

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0614-20009
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e034806
pubmed: 32229523
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 03;(10):CD002843
pubmed: 24092529
Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Dec;19(12):856-8
pubmed: 19050219
N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 17;352(7):676-85
pubmed: 15716561
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):93-6
pubmed: 9561875
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Dec;93(8):572-582
pubmed: 28396557
AIDS. 2000 Mar 31;14(5):537-46
pubmed: 10780716
Int J STD AIDS. 2012 Oct;23(10):748-52
pubmed: 23104751
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Mar;93(2):129-136
pubmed: 27535765
Science. 1977 Apr 8;196(4286):129-36
pubmed: 847460
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Can J Hum Sex. 2011;20(1):1-10
pubmed: 25382990
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2117-23
pubmed: 21940925
J Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;174 Suppl 2:S201-13
pubmed: 8843250
Int J STD AIDS. 2014 May;25(6):391-404
pubmed: 24285601

Auteurs

Claudia S Estcourt (CS)

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK claudia.estcourt@gcu.ac.uk.
Sandyford Sexual Health Service, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.

Paul Flowers (P)

School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Jackie A Cassell (JA)

Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK.

Maria Pothoulaki (M)

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Gabriele Vojt (G)

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Fiona Mapp (F)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Melvina Woode-Owusu (M)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Nicola Low (N)

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

John Saunders (J)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, Public Health England, London, UK.

Merle Symonds (M)

Department of Sexual Health, West Sussex Health and Social Care NHS Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK.

Alison Howarth (A)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Sonali Wayal (S)

Development Media International CIC, London, UK.

Rak Nandwani (R)

Sandyford Sexual Health Service, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.

Susie Brice (S)

Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Alex Comer (A)

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Anne M Johnson (AM)

Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Catherine H Mercer (CH)

Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH