Efficacy of intranasal ketamine for acute pain management in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences
ISSN: 2284-0729
Titre abrégé: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9717360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
entrez: 30 4 2021
pubmed: 1 5 2021
medline: 7 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intranasal (IN) ketamine for pain control with placebo and other analgesics in an emergency setting. Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IN ketamine with placebo or other analgesics up to 1st January 2021. Studies were to be conducted on adults and in an emergency setting. Pain outcomes and adverse events were compared. Seven RCTs were included. Three compared IN ketamine with placebo while others with opioids. Comparing IN ketamine with opioids, the pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in pain scores between the two groups at 15 minutes but better pain reduction with opioids at 30 minutes. Comparing IN ketamine with placebo, our analysis demonstrated a non-significant difference but a tendency for better pain relief with IN ketamine at 15 minutes and 60 minutes. Pain scores at 30 minutes were, however, significantly lower with IN ketamine as compared to placebo. The need for rescue analgesics was significantly lower with IN ketamine as compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in the incidence of dizziness and nausea/vomiting between IN ketamine and opioids. As compared to placebo, IN ketamine was associated with an increased incidence of dizziness but not nausea/vomiting. Emergence reactions were significantly increased with IN ketamine as compared to opioids and placebo. There may be a role of IN ketamine for acute pain management in adults in an emergency setting. There is a tendency for better pain control with IN ketamine as compared to control and the possibility of similar efficacy of IN ketamine as compared to opioids. However, the results are not unequivocal and are limited by the low number of studies in literature and limited pain indications studied. Further RCTs are required to strengthen the evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33928616
doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202104_25738
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics 0
Ketamine 690G0D6V8H

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3286-3295

Auteurs

X Li (X)

Department of Pharmacy, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, P.R. China. pf_1986@126.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH