Molecular light-upconversion: we have had a problem! When excited state absorption (ESA) overcomes energy transfer upconversion (ETU) in Cr(III)/Er(III) complexes.


Journal

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)
ISSN: 1477-9234
Titre abrégé: Dalton Trans
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101176026

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jun 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 1 5 2021
medline: 1 5 2021
entrez: 30 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nine-coordinate [ErN9] or [ErN3O6] chromophores found in triple helical [Er(L)3]3+ complexes (L corresponds to 2,2',6',2''-terpyridine (tpy), 2,6-(bisbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bzimpy), 2,6-diethylcarboxypyridine (dpa-ester) or 2,6-diethylcarboxamidopyridine (dpa-diamide) derivatives), [Er(dpa)3]3- (dpa is the 2,6-dipicolinate dianion) and [GaErGa(bpb-bzimpy)3]9+ (bpb-bzimpy is 2,6-bis((pyridin-2-benzimidazol-5-yl)methyl-(benzimidazol-2-yl))pyridine) exhibit NIR (excitation at 801 nm) into visible (emission at 542 nm) linear light upconversion processes in acetonitrile at room temperature. The associated quantum yields 5.5(6) × 10-11 ≤ φuptot(ESA) ≤ 1.7(2) × 10-9 appear to be 1-3 orders of magnitude larger than those predicted by the accepted single-center excited-state absorption mechanism (ESA). Switching to the alternative energy transfer upconversion mechanism (ETU), which operates in multi-centers [CrErCr(bpb-bzimpy)3]9+, leads to an improved quantum yield of φuptot(ETU) = 5.8(6) × 10-8, but also to an even larger discrepancy by 4-6 orders of magnitude when compared with theoretical models. All photophysical studies point to Er(4I13/2) as being the only available 'long-lived' (1.8 ≤ τ ≤ 6.3 μs) and emissive excited state, which works as an intermediate relay for absorbing the second photon, but with an unexpected large cross-section for an intrashell 4f → 4f electronic transition. With this in mind, the ETU mechanism, thought to optimize upconversion via intermetallic Cr → Er communication in [CrErCr(bpb-bzimpy)3]9+, is indeed not crucial and the boosted associated upconversion quantum yield is indebted to the dominant contribution of the single-center erbium ESA process. This curious phenomenon is responsible for the successful implementation of light upconversion in molecular coordination complexes under reasonable light power intensities, which paves the way for applications in medicine and biology. Its origin could be linked with the presence of metal-ligand bonding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33929478
doi: 10.1039/d1dt01079d
pmc: PMC8204332
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7955-7968

Références

J Chem Phys. 2012 Nov 28;137(20):204106
pubmed: 23205980
Acc Chem Res. 2020 Nov 17;53(11):2692-2704
pubmed: 33103883
Chem Commun (Camb). 2020 Dec 8;56(96):15118-15132
pubmed: 33206075
Chem Soc Rev. 2013 Jan 7;42(1):173-201
pubmed: 23072924
J Phys Chem Lett. 2021 Feb 11;12(5):1520-1541
pubmed: 33534586
Small. 2018 Oct;14(40):e1801882
pubmed: 30066496
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012 Apr 7;14(13):4322-32
pubmed: 22370856
J Comput Chem. 2010 Jan 15;31(1):224-47
pubmed: 19499541
Chem Commun (Camb). 2021 Jan 5;57(1):53-56
pubmed: 33332511
Opt Lett. 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1674-6
pubmed: 16075534
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Dec 21;11(47):11081-95
pubmed: 20024374
Chemistry. 2019 Nov 27;25(66):15112-15122
pubmed: 31496013
Chem Rev. 2015 Jan 14;115(1):395-465
pubmed: 25492128
Acc Chem Res. 2000 Apr;33(4):235-42
pubmed: 10775316
Dalton Trans. 2005 Jul 7;(13):2209-33
pubmed: 15962040
Acc Chem Res. 2014 Apr 15;47(4):1001-9
pubmed: 24422455
J Phys Chem A. 2021 Jan 14;125(1):209-217
pubmed: 33400867
Inorg Chem. 2016 Oct 17;55(20):9964-9972
pubmed: 27203270
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018 Nov 12;57(46):15172-15176
pubmed: 30265427
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Mar 7;11(9):1346-53
pubmed: 19224035
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Apr 26;50(18):4108-12
pubmed: 21462286
J Am Chem Soc. 2019 Jan 30;141(4):1568-1576
pubmed: 30612432
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014 Jun 14;16(22):10345-52
pubmed: 24733519
Chem Rev. 2004 Jan;104(1):139-73
pubmed: 14719973
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2016 Nov 29;3(12):1600302
pubmed: 27981015
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 15;7:11978
pubmed: 27302144
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Feb 18;126(6):1755-63
pubmed: 14871107
Chem Soc Rev. 2020 Sep 21;49(18):6529-6554
pubmed: 32955529
Inorg Chem. 1998 Oct 19;37(21):5575-5582
pubmed: 11670704
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Oct 18;19(40):27452-27462
pubmed: 28975162
Acc Chem Res. 2020 Aug 18;53(8):1520-1534
pubmed: 32667187
J Phys Chem Lett. 2014 Nov 20;5(22):4062-72
pubmed: 26276495
J Chem Theory Comput. 2020 Aug 11;16(8):5189-5202
pubmed: 32568538
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Jun 20;50(26):5808-29
pubmed: 21626614
Chem Sci. 2019 Jun 6;10(28):6876-6885
pubmed: 31391911
Chemistry. 2019 Mar 21;25(17):4435-4451
pubmed: 30815930
Anal Chem. 2011 Feb 15;83(4):1232-42
pubmed: 21250654
Dalton Trans. 2015 Feb 14;44(6):2529-40
pubmed: 25357092
Chem Mater. 2012 Mar 13;24(5):812-827
pubmed: 22919122
Inorg Chem. 2002 Mar 11;41(5):1048-55
pubmed: 11874337
Chemistry. 2018 Sep 6;24(50):13158-13169
pubmed: 30016559
Adv Mater. 2009 Feb 2;21(5):509-34
pubmed: 21161975
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Nov 13;56(46):14612-14617
pubmed: 28960751
Inorg Chem. 1998 Mar 23;37(6):1401-1412
pubmed: 11670353
Nanoscale. 2010 Aug;2(8):1417-9
pubmed: 20820726
Chem Soc Rev. 2017 Aug 14;46(16):4976-5004
pubmed: 28621347
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012 Oct 14;14(38):13378-84
pubmed: 22941389
Nat Protoc. 2013 Aug;8(8):1535-50
pubmed: 23868072
Chem Soc Rev. 2007 Jun;36(6):831-45
pubmed: 17534471
J Phys Chem Lett. 2014 Nov 20;5(22):4020-31
pubmed: 26276488
Nanoscale. 2017 Jul 20;9(28):10051-10058
pubmed: 28686275
J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Feb 1;139(4):1456-1459
pubmed: 28092442

Auteurs

Bahman Golesorkhi (B)

Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Bahman.Golesorkhi@berkeley.edu Claude.Piguet@unige.ch.

Inès Taarit (I)

Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Bahman.Golesorkhi@berkeley.edu Claude.Piguet@unige.ch.

Hélène Bolvin (H)

Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques, CNRS, Université Toulouse III, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France. bolvin@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr.

Homayoun Nozary (H)

Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Bahman.Golesorkhi@berkeley.edu Claude.Piguet@unige.ch.

Juan-Ramón Jiménez (JR)

Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Bahman.Golesorkhi@berkeley.edu Claude.Piguet@unige.ch.

Céline Besnard (C)

Laboratory of Crystallography, University of Geneva, 24 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

Laure Guénée (L)

Laboratory of Crystallography, University of Geneva, 24 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

Alexandre Fürstenberg (A)

Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Bahman.Golesorkhi@berkeley.edu Claude.Piguet@unige.ch and Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.

Claude Piguet (C)

Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Bahman.Golesorkhi@berkeley.edu Claude.Piguet@unige.ch.

Classifications MeSH