ALG3 contributes to stemness and radioresistance through regulating glycosylation of TGF-β receptor II in breast cancer.
ALG3
Breast cancer
Glycosylation
Radioresistance
Stemness
Journal
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR
ISSN: 1756-9966
Titre abrégé: J Exp Clin Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8308647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2021
30 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
02
11
2020
accepted:
30
03
2021
entrez:
1
5
2021
pubmed:
2
5
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Radiotherapy is a conventional and effective local treatment for breast cancer. However, residual or recurrent tumors appears frequently because of radioresistance. Novel predictive marker and the potential therapeutic targets of breast cancer radioresistance needs to be investigated. In this study, we screened all 10 asparagine-linked glycosylation (ALG) members in breast cancer patients' samples by RT-PCR. Cell viability after irradiation (IR) was determined by CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry. The radiosensitivity of cell lines with different ALG3 expression was determined with the colony formation assay by fitting the multi-target single hit model to the surviving fractions. Cancer stem-like traits were assessed by RT-PCR, Western blot, and flow cytometry. The mechanisms of ALG3 influencing radiosensitivity was detected by Western blot and immunoprecipitation. And the effect of ALG3 on tumor growth after IR was verified in an orthotopic xenograft tumor models. The association of ALG3 with prognosis of breast cancer patients was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. ALG3 was the most significantly overexpressing gene among ALG family in radioresistant breast cancer tissue. Overexpression of ALG3 predicted poor clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS), and early local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in breast cancer patients. Upregulating ALG3 enhanced radioresistance and cancer stemness in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, silencing ALG3 increased the radiosensitivity and repressed cancer stemness in vitro, and more importantly inhibition of ALG3 effectively increased the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vivo. Mechanistically, our results further revealed ALG3 promoted radioresistance and cancer stemness by inducing glycosylation of TGF-β receptor II (TGFBR2). Importantly, both attenuation of glycosylation using tunicamycin and inhibition of TGFBR2 using LY2109761 differentially abrogated the stimulatory effect of ALG3 overexpression on cancer stemness and radioresistance. Finally, our findings showed that radiation played an important role in preventing early recurrence in breast cancer patients with low ALG3 levels, but it had limited efficacy in ALG3-overexpressing breast cancer patients. Our results suggest that ALG3 may serve as a potential radiosensitive marker, and an effective target to decrease radioresistance by regulating glycosylation of TGFBR2 in breast cancer. For patients with low ALG3 levels, radiation remains an effective mainstay therapy to prevent early recurrence in breast cancer.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Radiotherapy is a conventional and effective local treatment for breast cancer. However, residual or recurrent tumors appears frequently because of radioresistance. Novel predictive marker and the potential therapeutic targets of breast cancer radioresistance needs to be investigated.
METHODS
METHODS
In this study, we screened all 10 asparagine-linked glycosylation (ALG) members in breast cancer patients' samples by RT-PCR. Cell viability after irradiation (IR) was determined by CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry. The radiosensitivity of cell lines with different ALG3 expression was determined with the colony formation assay by fitting the multi-target single hit model to the surviving fractions. Cancer stem-like traits were assessed by RT-PCR, Western blot, and flow cytometry. The mechanisms of ALG3 influencing radiosensitivity was detected by Western blot and immunoprecipitation. And the effect of ALG3 on tumor growth after IR was verified in an orthotopic xenograft tumor models. The association of ALG3 with prognosis of breast cancer patients was confirmed by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS
RESULTS
ALG3 was the most significantly overexpressing gene among ALG family in radioresistant breast cancer tissue. Overexpression of ALG3 predicted poor clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS), and early local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in breast cancer patients. Upregulating ALG3 enhanced radioresistance and cancer stemness in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, silencing ALG3 increased the radiosensitivity and repressed cancer stemness in vitro, and more importantly inhibition of ALG3 effectively increased the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vivo. Mechanistically, our results further revealed ALG3 promoted radioresistance and cancer stemness by inducing glycosylation of TGF-β receptor II (TGFBR2). Importantly, both attenuation of glycosylation using tunicamycin and inhibition of TGFBR2 using LY2109761 differentially abrogated the stimulatory effect of ALG3 overexpression on cancer stemness and radioresistance. Finally, our findings showed that radiation played an important role in preventing early recurrence in breast cancer patients with low ALG3 levels, but it had limited efficacy in ALG3-overexpressing breast cancer patients.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that ALG3 may serve as a potential radiosensitive marker, and an effective target to decrease radioresistance by regulating glycosylation of TGFBR2 in breast cancer. For patients with low ALG3 levels, radiation remains an effective mainstay therapy to prevent early recurrence in breast cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33931075
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01932-8
pii: 10.1186/s13046-021-01932-8
pmc: PMC8086123
doi:
Substances chimiques
ALG3 protein, human
EC 2.4.1.-
Mannosyltransferases
EC 2.4.1.-
Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type II
EC 2.7.11.30
TGFBR2 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.30
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
149Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81772877
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81773103
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81902504
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 91740118
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81773106
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81872459
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81803050
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : 016A030308002
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : 2018A030313666
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : 2017A030310422
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : 2017A030313617
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : 2020A1515010013
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):687-96
pubmed: 17504382
Mol Carcinog. 2020 May;59(5):533-544
pubmed: 32181526
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;17(4):633-8
pubmed: 21470452
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Jun 7;9(6):688
pubmed: 29880818
Clin Transl Oncol. 2014 Jul;16(7):606-15
pubmed: 24203761
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):290-300
pubmed: 22090360
Nat Commun. 2018 May 14;9(1):1876
pubmed: 29760377
Pathologe. 2010 Sep;31(5):361-6
pubmed: 20711589
Trends Cancer. 2020 Sep;6(9):757-766
pubmed: 32381431
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 15;21(16):3667-77
pubmed: 25904749
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012 Jan 01;17(2):670-99
pubmed: 22201768
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Nov;1833(11):2430-7
pubmed: 23583305
J Exp Med. 1999 Jun 7;189(11):1685-90
pubmed: 10359571
Biochem J. 2012 Aug 1;445(3):403-11
pubmed: 22571197
Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 1;71(23):7155-67
pubmed: 22006998
Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):357-368.e9
pubmed: 23123183
Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2020 Aug;43(4):695-707
pubmed: 32474852
Science. 2004 Oct 1;306(5693):120-4
pubmed: 15459394
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 23;9(1):3380
pubmed: 30140003
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Jun;13(6):324-33
pubmed: 27091662
Nat Commun. 2020 May 12;11(1):2364
pubmed: 32398665
Mol Aspects Med. 2016 Feb-Mar;47-48:15-23
pubmed: 26549347
Protein Cell. 2021 Feb;12(2):89-106
pubmed: 32583064
Mol Cancer. 2017 Jan 30;16(1):13
pubmed: 28137265
Glycobiology. 2010 Jun;20(6):736-51
pubmed: 20356820
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009 Apr;21(2):166-76
pubmed: 19237272
Protein Sci. 2015 Oct;24(10):1686-94
pubmed: 26177744
Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 26;12(6):
pubmed: 32466580
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 9;11(1):2898
pubmed: 32518258
J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(10):2059-69
pubmed: 10811671
Cell Metab. 2016 Sep 13;24(3):494-501
pubmed: 27476977
Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:631-64
pubmed: 3896128
Adv Cancer Res. 1989;52:257-331
pubmed: 2662714
Mol Cell. 2017 May 4;66(3):306-319
pubmed: 28475867
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Jan;10(1):M110.002717
pubmed: 21097542
Cell Stem Cell. 2011 Jan 7;8(1):59-71
pubmed: 21211782
Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 15;74(24):7498-509
pubmed: 25377473
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 1;24(3):659-673
pubmed: 29133573
Cell Res. 2014 Feb;24(2):143-60
pubmed: 24217768
Plant Cell. 2008 Jun;20(6):1652-64
pubmed: 18567790
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Dec 4;11(521):
pubmed: 31801883
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):15791-6
pubmed: 16236725
Clin Proteomics. 2011 Jun 03;8(1):7
pubmed: 21906357
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Jan 28;16:31
pubmed: 26822404
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jul;97:55-56
pubmed: 29731226
Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):453-455
pubmed: 29231972
Nature. 2017 Sep 28;549(7673):538-542
pubmed: 28959962
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 15;19(12):3189-200
pubmed: 23620409
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Jun;15(6):346-366
pubmed: 30858582
Mol Cancer. 2014 May 08;13:106
pubmed: 24886245
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 22;11(2):
pubmed: 30678233
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3222-3229
pubmed: 28759347
Oncogene. 2015 Dec 3;34(49):5997-6006
pubmed: 25746005
Clin Sci (Lond). 2016 Oct 1;130(20):1781-92
pubmed: 27612953
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Feb;3(2):119-28
pubmed: 15685223
Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Apr 4;24(4):592-607.e7
pubmed: 30853556
EMBO J. 2006 May 17;25(10):2167-77
pubmed: 16675955
Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;82:48-59
pubmed: 26751819
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Sep;15(9):540-55
pubmed: 26289314
J Exp Med. 2019 Feb 4;216(2):428-449
pubmed: 30593464
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013 Apr 1;923-924:16-21
pubmed: 23454304
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(6):393-410
pubmed: 21606941
ACS Nano. 2017 Jul 25;11(7):7164-7176
pubmed: 28640996
Adv Cancer Res. 2015;126:1-10
pubmed: 25727144
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35
pubmed: 24656685
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 13;8(1):2116
pubmed: 29235476
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 1;18(15):4059-69
pubmed: 22675169
BMC Cancer. 2010 Sep 16;10:495
pubmed: 20846391
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul;144(7):1253-1263
pubmed: 29725763
Cancer Cell. 2015 Nov 9;28(5):569-581
pubmed: 26555173
Dev Cell. 2018 Jun 4;45(5):595-605.e4
pubmed: 29870719
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):394-402; quiz 267
pubmed: 17368240
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Feb 15;19(2):
pubmed: 29462882
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 27;11(1):2042
pubmed: 32341362
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 1;17(23):7224-9
pubmed: 21976536
Surgery. 2006 Aug;140(2):161-9
pubmed: 16904965
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;9(9):530-8
pubmed: 22710573
J Clin Invest. 2011 Jul;121(7):2723-35
pubmed: 21633165
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 14;109(7):2354-7
pubmed: 22308443
Glycobiology. 1996 Jun;6(4):439-44
pubmed: 8842708
Cancer Discov. 2017 Jan;7(1):86-101
pubmed: 27663899
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2019 Dec;72(12):924-933
pubmed: 31235901
Cell. 2013 Jul 3;154(1):61-74
pubmed: 23827675
Mol Oncol. 2020 Mar;14(3):556-570
pubmed: 31930680
Glycobiology. 2017 Jan;27(1):3-49
pubmed: 27558841