Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose for production of glucaric acid by an artificial microbial consortium.
Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP)
D-Glucaric acid
Lignocellulose
Microbial consortium
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Trichoderma reesei
Journal
Biotechnology for biofuels
ISSN: 1754-6834
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2021
30 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
accepted:
21
04
2021
entrez:
1
5
2021
pubmed:
2
5
2021
medline:
2
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The biomanufacturing of D-glucaric acid has attracted increasing interest because it is one of the top value-added chemicals produced from biomass. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regarded as an excellent host for D-glucaric acid production. The opi1 gene was knocked out because of its negative regulation on myo-inositol synthesis, which is the limiting step of D-glucaric acid production by S. cerevisiae. We then constructed the biosynthesis pathway of D-glucaric acid in S. cerevisiae INVSc1 opi1Δ and obtained two engineered strains, LGA-1 and LGA-C, producing record-breaking titers of D-glucaric acid: 9.53 ± 0.46 g/L and 11.21 ± 0.63 g/L D-glucaric acid from 30 g/L glucose and 10.8 g/L myo-inositol in fed-batch fermentation mode, respectively. However, LGA-1 was preferable because of its genetic stability and its superior performance in practical applications. There have been no reports on D-glucaric acid production from lignocellulose. Therefore, the biorefinery processes, including separated hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) were investigated and compared. CBP using an artificial microbial consortium composed of Trichoderma reesei (T. reesei) Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1 was found to have relatively high D-glucaric acid titers and yields after 7 d of fermentation, 0.54 ± 0.12 g/L D-glucaric acid from 15 g/L Avicel and 0.45 ± 0.06 g/L D-glucaric acid from 15 g/L steam-exploded corn stover (SECS), respectively. In an attempt to design the microbial consortium for more efficient CBP, the team consisting of T. reesei Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1 was found to be the best, with excellent work distribution and collaboration. Two engineered S. cerevisiae strains, LGA-1 and LGA-C, with high titers of D-glucaric acid were obtained. This indicated that S. cerevisiae INVSc1 is an excellent host for D-glucaric acid production. Lignocellulose is a preferable substrate over myo-inositol. SHF, SSF, and CBP were studied, and CBP using an artificial microbial consortium of T. reesei Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1 was found to be promising because of its relatively high titer and yield. T. reesei Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1were proven to be the best teammates for CBP. Further work should be done to improve the efficiency of this microbial consortium for D-glucaric acid production from lignocellulose.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The biomanufacturing of D-glucaric acid has attracted increasing interest because it is one of the top value-added chemicals produced from biomass. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regarded as an excellent host for D-glucaric acid production.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The opi1 gene was knocked out because of its negative regulation on myo-inositol synthesis, which is the limiting step of D-glucaric acid production by S. cerevisiae. We then constructed the biosynthesis pathway of D-glucaric acid in S. cerevisiae INVSc1 opi1Δ and obtained two engineered strains, LGA-1 and LGA-C, producing record-breaking titers of D-glucaric acid: 9.53 ± 0.46 g/L and 11.21 ± 0.63 g/L D-glucaric acid from 30 g/L glucose and 10.8 g/L myo-inositol in fed-batch fermentation mode, respectively. However, LGA-1 was preferable because of its genetic stability and its superior performance in practical applications. There have been no reports on D-glucaric acid production from lignocellulose. Therefore, the biorefinery processes, including separated hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) were investigated and compared. CBP using an artificial microbial consortium composed of Trichoderma reesei (T. reesei) Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1 was found to have relatively high D-glucaric acid titers and yields after 7 d of fermentation, 0.54 ± 0.12 g/L D-glucaric acid from 15 g/L Avicel and 0.45 ± 0.06 g/L D-glucaric acid from 15 g/L steam-exploded corn stover (SECS), respectively. In an attempt to design the microbial consortium for more efficient CBP, the team consisting of T. reesei Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1 was found to be the best, with excellent work distribution and collaboration.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Two engineered S. cerevisiae strains, LGA-1 and LGA-C, with high titers of D-glucaric acid were obtained. This indicated that S. cerevisiae INVSc1 is an excellent host for D-glucaric acid production. Lignocellulose is a preferable substrate over myo-inositol. SHF, SSF, and CBP were studied, and CBP using an artificial microbial consortium of T. reesei Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1 was found to be promising because of its relatively high titer and yield. T. reesei Rut-C30 and S. cerevisiae LGA-1were proven to be the best teammates for CBP. Further work should be done to improve the efficiency of this microbial consortium for D-glucaric acid production from lignocellulose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33931115
doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-01961-7
pii: 10.1186/s13068-021-01961-7
pmc: PMC8086319
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
110Subventions
Organisme : Young Scientists Fund
ID : 22007079
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
ID : 2018JQ2022
Organisme : Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation
ID : 2017BSHEDZZ100
Organisme : Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
ID : 2018T111102
Organisme : Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
ID : 2016M600815
Références
Microb Cell Fact. 2019 Jan 18;18(1):9
pubmed: 30657063
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Feb;75(3):589-95
pubmed: 19060162
Metab Eng. 2010 May;12(3):298-305
pubmed: 20117231
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jun;101(11):4111-9
pubmed: 20149642
Microb Cell Fact. 2018 May 5;17(1):67
pubmed: 29729665
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Sep;216:988-95
pubmed: 27343451
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(10):1671-8
pubmed: 18833205
J Bacteriol. 2009 Mar;191(5):1565-73
pubmed: 19060141
Metab Eng. 2018 May;47:393-400
pubmed: 29715517
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Aug 23;10:202
pubmed: 28852423
Carbohydr Res. 2012 Mar 1;350:6-13
pubmed: 22285512
Front Microbiol. 2014 Jul 09;5:344
pubmed: 25071754
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Aug;114(8):1855-1864
pubmed: 28409846
Chem Phys Lipids. 2014 May;180:23-43
pubmed: 24418527
Biotechnol J. 2016 Sep;11(9):1201-8
pubmed: 27312887
Metab Eng. 2013 Jan;15:55-66
pubmed: 23164574
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Jun;20(3):364-71
pubmed: 19520566
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8931-6
pubmed: 24889625
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Sep;144:693-7
pubmed: 23910529
Plant Physiol. 2004 Mar;134(3):1200-5
pubmed: 14976233
Metab Eng. 2014 Mar;22:22-31
pubmed: 24333274
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(1):1-4
pubmed: 17401330
Biotechnol Adv. 2015 Nov 1;33(6 Pt 2):1091-107
pubmed: 25485865
J Biol Chem. 2013 Aug 23;288(34):24898-908
pubmed: 23824185