Variability in stem taper surface topography affects the degree of corrosion and fretting in total hip arthroplasty.
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ adverse effects
Ceramics
/ chemistry
Chromium Alloys
/ chemistry
Corrosion
Female
Hip Joint
/ physiopathology
Hip Prosthesis
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stress, Mechanical
Surface Properties
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 04 2021
30 04 2021
Historique:
received:
26
06
2020
accepted:
19
03
2021
entrez:
1
5
2021
pubmed:
2
5
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Degradation at the modular head-neck interface in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is predominately expressed in the form of corrosion and fretting, potentially causing peri-prosthetic failure by adverse reactions to metal debris. This retrieval study aimed to quantify variations in stem taper surface topographies and to assess the influence on the formation of corrosion and/or fretting in titanium alloy stem tapers combined with metal and ceramic heads. Four hip stem designs (Alloclassic, CLS, Bicontact and SL-Plus) were characterized using high-resolution 3D microscopy, and corrosion and fretting were rated using the Goldberg scoring scheme. Quantification of the taper surface topographies revealed a high variability in surface characteristics between threaded stem tapers: Alloclassic and CLS tapers feature deeply threaded trapezoid-shaped profiles with thread heights over 65 µm. The sawtooth-shaped Bicontact and triangular SL-Plus taper are characterized by low thread heights below 14 µm. Significantly lower corrosion and fretting scores were observed in lightly threaded compared to deeply threaded tapers in ceramic head combinations. No significant differences in corrosion or fretting scores with thread height were found in pairings with metal heads. Understanding the relationship between stem taper surface topography and the formation of corrosion and fretting could help to improve the performance of modern THAs and lead to longer-lasting clinical results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33931680
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88234-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-88234-3
pmc: PMC8087796
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromium Alloys
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9348Références
HSS J. 2017 Feb;13(1):2-6
pubmed: 28167866
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Feb;80(2):268-82
pubmed: 9486734
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Apr;116:104258
pubmed: 33497961
J Biomech. 2020 Apr 16;103:109689
pubmed: 32139099
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Nov 13;5(11):776-784
pubmed: 33312704
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
J Orthop Res. 2013 Dec;31(12):2032-9
pubmed: 23966288
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3270-82
pubmed: 23761174
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):579-86
pubmed: 11380136
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015 Jan;229(1):91-7
pubmed: 25655958
J Biomech. 2020 Jan 2;98:109424
pubmed: 31676083
Materials (Basel). 2017 Apr 28;10(5):
pubmed: 28772828
Semin Arthroplasty. 2013 Dec 1;24(4):246-254
pubmed: 24610994
J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Dec;27(12):1533-44
pubmed: 8113241
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):1036-40
pubmed: 23528551
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Jan;27(1):77-83
pubmed: 21903309
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Aug;93(8):1011-6
pubmed: 21768621
Hip Int. 2015 Mar-Apr;25(2):115-9
pubmed: 25362881
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):405-416
pubmed: 28485507
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):985-94
pubmed: 26847452
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2232-42
pubmed: 27339123
J Orthop Res. 2004 Mar;22(2):250-9
pubmed: 15013082
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):44-49
pubmed: 29292339
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:758123
pubmed: 25954757
Bone Joint J. 2016 May;98-B(5):579-84
pubmed: 27143725
J Orthop Res. 2015 Dec;33(12):1868-74
pubmed: 26135357
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Jan;88(1):206-19
pubmed: 18683224
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Aug;(401):149-61
pubmed: 12151892
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Mar 1;72:252-258
pubmed: 28024583
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1310-1319
pubmed: 30295525
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul;470(7):1885-94
pubmed: 22048865
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3963-70
pubmed: 25267272
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1313-7
pubmed: 24411082
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 17;10(8):e0135517
pubmed: 26280914
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):564-71
pubmed: 23801060
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1363-1373
pubmed: 28111124
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):277-81
pubmed: 27460298
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1793-802
pubmed: 26830782
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Mar;17(1):1-6
pubmed: 26868420
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):898-902
pubmed: 29954198
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):330-8
pubmed: 26208607
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0156051
pubmed: 27295038
J Orthop Res. 2015 Jan;33(1):98-105
pubmed: 25319315
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 May;69:257-266
pubmed: 28110182
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3191-3199
pubmed: 28552447
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Oct;(319):94-105
pubmed: 7554654
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Apr;4(3):476-83
pubmed: 21316636
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Jan;39:94-101
pubmed: 27913177
J Biomech. 2017 Oct 3;63:47-54
pubmed: 28823504
Int Orthop. 2008 Oct;32(5):597-604
pubmed: 17443324
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):2-6
pubmed: 23910820
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jun 1;100-B(6):720-724
pubmed: 29855241
Bone Joint Res. 2017 May;6(5):345-350
pubmed: 28566326