Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 04 2021
30 04 2021
Historique:
received:
20
11
2020
accepted:
16
04
2021
entrez:
1
5
2021
pubmed:
2
5
2021
medline:
6
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20-100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3-79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876-0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33931692
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x
pmc: PMC8087776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9365Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):538-539
pubmed: 32096564
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1021-1028
pubmed: 32286245
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 May 03;23:100375
pubmed: 32368728
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):e33-e34
pubmed: 32059799
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Sep;57(6):389-399
pubmed: 32503382
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1095-1099
pubmed: 32301746
J Med Syst. 2020 Jul 1;44(8):135
pubmed: 32607737
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104537
pubmed: 32659712
J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):e6-e12
pubmed: 32283162
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):494-496
pubmed: 32492294
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1131-1134
pubmed: 32119647
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1757-1766
pubmed: 32329974
Shock. 2020 Nov;54(5):652-658
pubmed: 32554992
Respir Res. 2020 Mar 26;21(1):74
pubmed: 32216803
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Sep 1;5(5):1038-1049
pubmed: 32573713
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 4;8(1):e43
pubmed: 32259132
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844
pubmed: 32159775
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(3):48
pubmed: 32154288