Adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report.
Journal
Spinal cord
ISSN: 1476-5624
Titre abrégé: Spinal Cord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609749
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
18
11
2020
accepted:
08
04
2021
revised:
08
04
2021
pubmed:
2
5
2021
medline:
27
10
2021
entrez:
1
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Psychometric study, cross-sectional validation study. To adapt and validate the Japanese version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure self-report (SCIM-SR). A spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation facility in Japan. We adapted the SCIM-SR for the Japanese population by translating and validating the questionnaire in accordance with the international guidelines. Following this, we analyzed 100 inpatients with SCI. We evaluated their independence using the Japanese SCIM-SR, and compared the data with those assessed using the SCIM III by trained ward nurses. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were 0.95 for the total score, 0.89 for self-care, 0.83 for respiration and sphincter management, and 0.89 for mobility subscores. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (-0.02; 95% CI [-0.07, 0.06]), but a significant fixed bias (2; 95% CI [0.5, 3.5]). We did not identify any specific factor that affected the differences between SCIM III and SCIM-SR scores. Our study validated the Japanese version of SCIM-SR as a tool for the evaluation of the independence of persons with SCI, which could substitute SCIM III and help facilitate a deeper understanding of activities of daily living among patients with SCI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33931747
doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00633-5
pii: 10.1038/s41393-021-00633-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1096-1103Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
ID : 18K17705
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society.
Références
Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, et al. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1926–33.
doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302
Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:275–91.
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101960
Itzkovich M, Shefler H, Front L, Gur-Pollack R, Elkayam K, Bluvshtein V, et al. SCIM III (Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III): reliability of assessment by interview and comparison with assessment by observation. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:46–51.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.97
Fekete C, Eriks-Hoogland I, Baumberger M, Catz A, Itzkovich M, Luthi H, et al. Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord. 2013;51:40–7.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.87
Aguilar-Rodriguez M, Pena-Paches L, Grao-Castellote C, Torralba-Collados F, Hervas-Marin D, Giner-Pascual M. Adaptation and validation of the Spanish self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord. 2015;53:451–4.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.225
Bonavita J, Torre M, China S, Bressi F, Bonatti E, Capirossi R, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:553–60.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.187
Wilartratsami S, Luksanapruksa P, Santipas B, Thanasomboonpan N, Kulprasutdilok P, Chavasiri S, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report. Spinal Cord. 2020;59:291–7.
Wang T, Tang J, Xie S, He X, Wang Y, Liu T, et al. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report. Spinal Cord. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00601-5 .
Divanoglou A, Tasiemski T, Jörgensen S. INTERnational Project for the Evaluation of “activE Rehabilitation” (inter-PEER)—a protocol for a prospective cohort study of community peer-based training programmes for people with spinal cord injury. BMC Neurol. 2020;20:14.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1546-5
Bockbrader M, Annetta N, Friedenberg D, Schwemmer M, Skomrock N, Colachis S, et al. Clinically significant gains in skillful grasp coordination by an individual with tetraplegia using an implanted brain-computer interface with forearm transcutaneous muscle stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100:1201–17.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.445
Reinhardt JD, Ballert C, Brinkhof MW, Post MW. Perceived impact of environmental barriers on participation among people living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:210–8.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-2048
Prodinger B, Ballert CS, Cieza A. Setting up a cohort study of functioning: from classification to measurement. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:131–40.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-2030
COSMIN. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf .
Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(Suppl 1):S124–8.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
Ratner B. The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? J Target Meas Anal Market. 2009;17:139–42.
Hinkle DE, Jurs SG, Wiersma W. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2009.
Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.
pubmed: 23638278
pmcid: 3576830
Tsuji T, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Liu M, Chino N. ADL structure for stroke patients in Japan based on the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:432–8.
doi: 10.1097/00002060-199511000-00007
Pili R, Gaviano L, Pili L, Petretto DR. Ageing, disability, and spinal cord injury: some issues of analysis. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2018;2018:4017858.
doi: 10.1155/2018/4017858
Kudo D, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Kasukawa Y, Ishikawa Y, Ishikawa N, et al. An epidemiological study of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the fastest aging area in Japan. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:509–15.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0255-7
Lee BB, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, Wing PC. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:110–6.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.158
Unai K, Uemura O, Takemura R, Kawakami M, Liu M. Association between SCIM III total scores and individual item scores to predict independence with ADLs in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Rehab Res Clin Trans. 2019;1:100029.
Prodinger B, Ballert CS, Brinkhof MW, Tennant A, Post MW. Metric properties of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure—self report in a community survey. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:149–64.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-2059
Tomioka Y, Uemura O, Ishii R, Liu M. Using a logarithmic model to predict functional independence after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:1048–56.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0315-z
Clinical Practice Guidelines Neurogenic Bowel Management in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. https://pva-cdnendpoint.azureedge.net/prod/libraries/media/pva/library/publications/cpg_neurogenic-bowel.pdf .
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Med. 2015;25:141–51.
doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60.
doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204