Targeting the PI3K and MAPK pathways to improve response to HER2-targeted therapies in HER2-positive gastric cancer.
HER2-positive gastric cancer
MAPK
PI3K
Signalling pathway activation
Somatic mutations
Targeted therapies
Treatment resistance
Journal
Journal of translational medicine
ISSN: 1479-5876
Titre abrégé: J Transl Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2021
01 05 2021
Historique:
received:
10
02
2021
accepted:
18
04
2021
entrez:
2
5
2021
pubmed:
3
5
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aberrant PI3K signalling is implicated in trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC). The role of PI3K or MEK inhibitors in sensitising HER2-positive GCs to trastuzumab or in overcoming trastuzumab resistance is unclear. Using mass spectrometry-based genotyping we analysed 105 hotspot, non-synonymous somatic mutations in PIK3CA and ERBB-family (EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3 and ERBB4) genes in gastric tumour samples from 69 patients. A panel of gastric cell lines (N87, OE19, ESO26, SNU16, KATOIII) were profiled for anti-proliferative response to the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and the MEK1/2 inhibitor refametinib alone and in combination with anti-HER2 therapies. Patients with HER2-positive GC had significantly poorer overall survival compared to HER2-negative patients (15.9 months vs. 35.7 months). Mutations in PIK3CA were only identified in HER2-negative tumours, while ERBB-family mutations were identified in HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumours. Copanlisib had anti-proliferative effects in 4/5 cell lines, with IC50s ranging from 23.4 (N87) to 93.8 nM (SNU16). All HER2-positive cell lines except SNU16 were sensitive to lapatinib (IC50s 0.04 µM-1.5 µM). OE19 cells were resistant to trastuzumab. The combination of lapatinib and copanlisib was synergistic in ESO-26 and OE-19 cells (ED50: 0.83 ± 0.19 and 0.88 ± 0.13, respectively) and additive in NCI-N87 cells (ED50:1.01 ± 0.55). The combination of copanlisib and trastuzumab significantly improved growth inhibition compared to either therapy alone in NCI-N87, ESO26 and OE19 cells (p < 0.05). PI3K or MEK inhibition alone or in combination with anti-HER2 therapy may represent an improved treatment strategy for some patients with HER2-positive GC, and warrants further investigation in a clinical trial setting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Aberrant PI3K signalling is implicated in trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC). The role of PI3K or MEK inhibitors in sensitising HER2-positive GCs to trastuzumab or in overcoming trastuzumab resistance is unclear.
METHODS
Using mass spectrometry-based genotyping we analysed 105 hotspot, non-synonymous somatic mutations in PIK3CA and ERBB-family (EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3 and ERBB4) genes in gastric tumour samples from 69 patients. A panel of gastric cell lines (N87, OE19, ESO26, SNU16, KATOIII) were profiled for anti-proliferative response to the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and the MEK1/2 inhibitor refametinib alone and in combination with anti-HER2 therapies.
RESULTS
Patients with HER2-positive GC had significantly poorer overall survival compared to HER2-negative patients (15.9 months vs. 35.7 months). Mutations in PIK3CA were only identified in HER2-negative tumours, while ERBB-family mutations were identified in HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumours. Copanlisib had anti-proliferative effects in 4/5 cell lines, with IC50s ranging from 23.4 (N87) to 93.8 nM (SNU16). All HER2-positive cell lines except SNU16 were sensitive to lapatinib (IC50s 0.04 µM-1.5 µM). OE19 cells were resistant to trastuzumab. The combination of lapatinib and copanlisib was synergistic in ESO-26 and OE-19 cells (ED50: 0.83 ± 0.19 and 0.88 ± 0.13, respectively) and additive in NCI-N87 cells (ED50:1.01 ± 0.55). The combination of copanlisib and trastuzumab significantly improved growth inhibition compared to either therapy alone in NCI-N87, ESO26 and OE19 cells (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
PI3K or MEK inhibition alone or in combination with anti-HER2 therapy may represent an improved treatment strategy for some patients with HER2-positive GC, and warrants further investigation in a clinical trial setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33933113
doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02842-1
pii: 10.1186/s12967-021-02842-1
pmc: PMC8088633
doi:
Substances chimiques
Lapatinib
0VUA21238F
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
184Références
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2034-2042
pubmed: 22172323
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):616-628
pubmed: 29650363
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec 18;10:274
pubmed: 23249720
Oncologist. 2018 Sep;23(9):1092-1102
pubmed: 29700210
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;5(5):301-18
pubmed: 22973416
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(2):373-83
pubmed: 25528022
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97
pubmed: 20728210
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 19;5:9289
pubmed: 25786580
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan 14;12(2):204-13
pubmed: 16482619
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(10):2833-40
pubmed: 21468783
Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Nov;12(11):2319-30
pubmed: 24170767
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1033-4
pubmed: 27566248
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v38-v49
pubmed: 27664260
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2656-2662
pubmed: 22689179
Ann Oncol. 1997 Feb;8(2):163-8
pubmed: 9093725
Histopathology. 2012 Nov;61(5):769-76
pubmed: 22882541
J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 6;279(32):33759-67
pubmed: 15175348
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Aug;9(8):550-62
pubmed: 19629070
Proteome Sci. 2012 Sep 24;10(1):56
pubmed: 23006314
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 1;29(22):3030-6
pubmed: 21709195
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 11;15:894
pubmed: 26560145
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(1):5-15
pubmed: 25542271
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 5;7(14):18424-39
pubmed: 26919099
Cancer Cell. 2007 Oct;12(4):395-402
pubmed: 17936563
Cancer Discov. 2013 Feb;3(2):224-37
pubmed: 23220880
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Dec;4(12):988-1004
pubmed: 16341064
Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;65(16):7052-8
pubmed: 16103051
J Transl Med. 2008 Sep 29;6:53
pubmed: 18823558
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Sep 20;11:6111-6118
pubmed: 30275715
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 1;24(19):4650-4661
pubmed: 29950351
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 May 15;22(10):2368-76
pubmed: 26644411
Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):202-9
pubmed: 25079317
Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4
pubmed: 22588877
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):719-26
pubmed: 11821453
Blood Cancer J. 2013 Sep 06;3:e141
pubmed: 24013662
Clin Proteomics. 2010 Dec;6(4):129-51
pubmed: 21691416
Mol Cancer Ther. 2010 Jun;9(6):1489-502
pubmed: 20501798
Cancer Res. 2009 Aug 1;69(15):6299-306
pubmed: 19602588
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jul 3;105(13):960-7
pubmed: 23739063
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 21;109(8):2718-23
pubmed: 21368164
Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 1;69(17):6839-47
pubmed: 19706763
Gut. 2019 Jul;68(7):1152-1161
pubmed: 30269082
Sci Signal. 2013 Apr 02;6(269):pl1
pubmed: 23550210
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2039-49
pubmed: 24868024
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 22;8(49):85120-85135
pubmed: 29156708
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 30;8(69):114371-114392
pubmed: 29371993
Ann Oncol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1523-9
pubmed: 18441328
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Aug;65(8):751-7
pubmed: 22569536
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 1;19(5):1232-43
pubmed: 23434733
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3935-43
pubmed: 24043745