Outcomes of 601 Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissections in a Single Western Center: Is Right Colon Location Still a Major Concern?
Journal
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
ISSN: 1534-4908
Titre abrégé: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2021
03 May 2021
Historique:
received:
01
02
2021
accepted:
17
03
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
3
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as a minimally invasive procedure for removal of early gastrointestinal neoplasms, is a standard approach in Asian countries. Outcomes of ESD in Western European countries significantly differ, which makes it more difficult to apply this procedure to daily-basis clinical routine. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficiency of colorectal ESD based on a large series of cases performed by a single operator after finishing the learning curve period in a western referral center. We retrospectively studied 601 patients who underwent ESD procedure for colorectal neoplasm from January 2016 to December 2019 in a tertiary colorectal ESD center in Poland. The overall en bloc resection was achieved in 88.02%. Complete histologic resection rate (R0) was reported at a level of 86.36%. Lesions located in the right colon were characterized by statistically lower en bloc, R0 resection, and success rate (73.95%, 71.43%, 69.75%, respectively). In 9.82% (n=59) of cases, the ESD procedure-related complications have been observed. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 23 patients (3.83%) and perforation in 32 patients (5.32%). Twenty-seven patients were treated endoscopically (4.49%) and 5 required surgery (0.83%). Analysis of complications showed that tumors located within the right colon were characterized by the highest perforation rate at 10.92%. Within the rectum there were minimal number of perforations (2.69%), whereas the bleeding rate was 4.48%. Our results represent the largest material concerning ESD of colorectal lesions in the West and show that ESD is characterized by a high rate of successful resections with a low risk of complications. Thus, confirming that it is possible to obtain results similar to Asian centers and that colorectal ESD procedures can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries. Nevertheless, ESD in the right colon is still related with high rate of complications, so qualification for the ESD procedure should be very careful and discussed with the patient and should be performed by an experienced endoscopist after the learning curve.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as a minimally invasive procedure for removal of early gastrointestinal neoplasms, is a standard approach in Asian countries. Outcomes of ESD in Western European countries significantly differ, which makes it more difficult to apply this procedure to daily-basis clinical routine. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficiency of colorectal ESD based on a large series of cases performed by a single operator after finishing the learning curve period in a western referral center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively studied 601 patients who underwent ESD procedure for colorectal neoplasm from January 2016 to December 2019 in a tertiary colorectal ESD center in Poland.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The overall en bloc resection was achieved in 88.02%. Complete histologic resection rate (R0) was reported at a level of 86.36%. Lesions located in the right colon were characterized by statistically lower en bloc, R0 resection, and success rate (73.95%, 71.43%, 69.75%, respectively). In 9.82% (n=59) of cases, the ESD procedure-related complications have been observed. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 23 patients (3.83%) and perforation in 32 patients (5.32%). Twenty-seven patients were treated endoscopically (4.49%) and 5 required surgery (0.83%). Analysis of complications showed that tumors located within the right colon were characterized by the highest perforation rate at 10.92%. Within the rectum there were minimal number of perforations (2.69%), whereas the bleeding rate was 4.48%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results represent the largest material concerning ESD of colorectal lesions in the West and show that ESD is characterized by a high rate of successful resections with a low risk of complications. Thus, confirming that it is possible to obtain results similar to Asian centers and that colorectal ESD procedures can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries. Nevertheless, ESD in the right colon is still related with high rate of complications, so qualification for the ESD procedure should be very careful and discussed with the patient and should be performed by an experienced endoscopist after the learning curve.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33935259
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000940
pii: 00129689-202110000-00015
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
578-583Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Fukuzawa M, Gotoda T. History of endoscopic submucosal dissection and role for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a Japanese perspective. Gastrointest Interv. 2012;1:30–35.
Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:74.e17–86.e17.
Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H, et al. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Dig Endosc. 2012;24(suppl 1):129–132.
Spychalski M, Skulimowski A, Dziki A, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the West—when can satisfactory results be obtained? A single-operator learning curve analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:1442–1452.
Spychalski M, Dziki A. Safe and efficient colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in European settings: is successful implementation of the procedure possible? Dig Endosc. 2015;27:368–373.
Sakamoto T, Mori G, Yamada M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:16153–16158.
Saito Y, Yamada M, So E, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: technical advantages compared to endoscopic mucosal resection and minimally invasive surgery. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(suppl 1):52–61.
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–434.
Arimoto J, Higurashi T, Kato S, et al. Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Endosc Int Open. 2018;06:E342–E349.
Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A, et al. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:863.e33–876.e33.
Maselli R, Iacopini F, Azzolini F, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Italian national survey on current practices, training and outcomes. Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52:64–71.
Ma MX, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: current status and future directions. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:310–320.
Yamashita K, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma does not affect the prognosis of patients who underwent additional surgery: a large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:897–906.
Rönnow C-F, Uedo N, Toth E, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe. Endosc Int Open. 2018;06:E1340–E1348.
Ito S, Hotta K, Imai K, et al. Risk factors of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome for colorectal neoplasm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:2001–2006.
Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016;04:E1030–E1044.
Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD, et al. Increasing rates of surgery for patients with nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the united States. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1352.e3–1360.e3.
Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47:829–854.
Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, et al. AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:16.e1–25.e1.
Gamaleldin M, Benlice C, Delaney CP, et al. Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: a case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy. Surgery. 2018;163:522–527.