Determination of residues of pesticides, anabolic steroids, antibiotics, and antibacterial compounds in meat products in Oman by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
anabolic steroids
antibiotic
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
meat products
pesticides
residue
Journal
Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
29
09
2020
accepted:
05
02
2021
entrez:
3
5
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
4
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Meat is a rich source of many nutrients and plays a vital role in human life however, meat safety is one of the top priorities of great concern for consumers today. More than 90% of human exposure to harmful materials is due to consumption of contaminated meat products. This study was designed to compare four valid analytical methods for the determination of organochlorine pesticides 2,4 D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene/dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, alachlor, organophosphate, anabolic steroids (progesterone, testosterone, and estrogen), antibiotics (tetracycline, sulfonamides, gentamycin, and cephalexin), antibacterial compounds (Macrolide, ß-Lactam, Chloramphenicol, Sulphur drugs, and Gentamicin) residues in 135 beef, buffalo, and sheep meat samples (fresh, frozen meats, minced, and sausage samples) of local, regional, and international brands available in Omani markets. Triplicate meat samples from each brand within each species were extracted with acetonitrile and purified with acetonitrile-saturated n-hexane to remove all impurities. To dry the sample after heating, the residue was passed across a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge for sample cleaning before gas chromatography (GC) (Brand GCMS-QP2010 Plus) coupled with different detectors, including a mass spectrometer or GC-electron capture detector (GC-ECD). Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was also employed for the quantification of the residues in meat products. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were employed to assess veterinary drug residues, anabolic steroids, and pesticides. The CHARM II instrument was employed to detect chloramphenicol, gentamicin, sulfa-drug, ß-lactam, and macrolide residues in meat and meat product samples. A thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) method should be considered as another method of choice to determine concentrations of veterinary drugs and anabolic steroids. The TLC results were validated by LC-MS. The three described methods permit the multi-residue analysis of anabolic steroid residue levels of 0.06-1.89 ppb in meat product samples. There were three violative residues of anabolic steroids in red meat products that were above the maximum residue limits (MRLs). Although, the levels of organochlorine pesticides and antibiotic concentrations in meat products were below the MRLs, the long-term consumption is considered a health hazard and will affect the wellbeing of consumers. The four techniques (GC, high-performance liquid chromatography, ELISA and CHARM II) provided results that were reliable and precise for the detection of chessssmical residues in meat and meat products.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Meat is a rich source of many nutrients and plays a vital role in human life however, meat safety is one of the top priorities of great concern for consumers today. More than 90% of human exposure to harmful materials is due to consumption of contaminated meat products. This study was designed to compare four valid analytical methods for the determination of organochlorine pesticides 2,4 D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene/dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, alachlor, organophosphate, anabolic steroids (progesterone, testosterone, and estrogen), antibiotics (tetracycline, sulfonamides, gentamycin, and cephalexin), antibacterial compounds (Macrolide, ß-Lactam, Chloramphenicol, Sulphur drugs, and Gentamicin) residues in 135 beef, buffalo, and sheep meat samples (fresh, frozen meats, minced, and sausage samples) of local, regional, and international brands available in Omani markets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Triplicate meat samples from each brand within each species were extracted with acetonitrile and purified with acetonitrile-saturated n-hexane to remove all impurities. To dry the sample after heating, the residue was passed across a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge for sample cleaning before gas chromatography (GC) (Brand GCMS-QP2010 Plus) coupled with different detectors, including a mass spectrometer or GC-electron capture detector (GC-ECD). Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was also employed for the quantification of the residues in meat products. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were employed to assess veterinary drug residues, anabolic steroids, and pesticides. The CHARM II instrument was employed to detect chloramphenicol, gentamicin, sulfa-drug, ß-lactam, and macrolide residues in meat and meat product samples.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) method should be considered as another method of choice to determine concentrations of veterinary drugs and anabolic steroids. The TLC results were validated by LC-MS. The three described methods permit the multi-residue analysis of anabolic steroid residue levels of 0.06-1.89 ppb in meat product samples. There were three violative residues of anabolic steroids in red meat products that were above the maximum residue limits (MRLs). Although, the levels of organochlorine pesticides and antibiotic concentrations in meat products were below the MRLs, the long-term consumption is considered a health hazard and will affect the wellbeing of consumers.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The four techniques (GC, high-performance liquid chromatography, ELISA and CHARM II) provided results that were reliable and precise for the detection of chessssmical residues in meat and meat products.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33935417
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.709-720
pii: Vetworld-14-709
pmc: PMC8076474
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
709-720Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Al-Amri, et al.
Références
Zoonoses Public Health. 2012 Aug;59(5):330-8
pubmed: 22333519
Biosensors (Basel). 2014 Nov 21;4(4):472-93
pubmed: 25587435
J Chromatogr A. 2009 Nov 13;1216(46):8035-50
pubmed: 19342055
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2017 Jul;34(7):1162-1171
pubmed: 28406073
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Jul;52(1):5-7
pubmed: 12805262
J Hazard Mater. 2018 Feb 5;343:140-148
pubmed: 28946134
J Chromatogr A. 2007 Jan 26;1140(1-2):147-56
pubmed: 17187807
J AOAC Int. 2000 Jul-Aug;83(4):809-19
pubmed: 10995107
Anal Chim Acta. 2016 Oct 26;942:121-138
pubmed: 27720116
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Mar;125:462-466
pubmed: 30710599
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2015 Oct 1;1002:19-29
pubmed: 26298066
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:151363
pubmed: 23484082
Environ Res. 2019 Feb;169:483-493
pubmed: 30530088
APMIS. 2001 Jan;109(1):32-8
pubmed: 11297192
Chemosphere. 2006 Oct;65(5):725-59
pubmed: 16677683
Sci Total Environ. 1994 Aug 15;153(1-2):29-49
pubmed: 7939620
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 May;110(5):445-56
pubmed: 12003747
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010;(195):411-57
pubmed: 20020375
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8
pubmed: 20110467
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Jul 10;67(27):7569-7586
pubmed: 31198037
Jpn J Vet Res. 2013 Feb;61 Suppl:S13-22
pubmed: 23631148
J Anal Methods Chem. 2017;2017:2603067
pubmed: 29435383
J Mass Spectrom. 2007 Aug;42(8):983-98
pubmed: 17657726
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Apr;49(4):585-6
pubmed: 11909829
Anal Sci. 2002 Jan;18(1):97-100
pubmed: 11817738
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008 Oct;6(5):593-600
pubmed: 18847400
J Chromatogr A. 2009 Nov 13;1216(46):8016-34
pubmed: 19665721
Vet J. 2004 May;167(3):242-57
pubmed: 15080873