Economic Evaluation of the Use of FeNO for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma Patients in Primary Care in Sweden.
FeNO
asthma
diagnosis
exhaled nitric oxide
health economy
management
Journal
ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR
ISSN: 1178-6981
Titre abrégé: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101560564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
15
02
2021
accepted:
25
03
2021
entrez:
3
5
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
4
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine the economic impact of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in asthma diagnosis and management in primary care in Sweden. An economic model has been developed to determine the economic impact of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in asthma diagnosis and management in primary care in Sweden. The model includes the use and cost of commonly used tests, the associated outcomes and diagnostic accuracy. We compared FeNO with spirometry and reversibility testing, methacholine challenge test, allergy testing, and blood eosinophil count. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to confirm the robustness of results. Adding FeNO measurement in asthma diagnosis resulted in cost savings of SEK 672 per patient by the fourth year. The use of FeNO testing in asthma management proved to be a dominant strategy when compared with each other test except methacholine challenge test. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Introducing FeNO testing in clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of asthma in primary care in Sweden is less costly than standard methods while providing similar health benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33935507
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S306389
pii: 306389
pmc: PMC8079249
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
289-297Informations de copyright
© 2021 Darbà et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
J Darbà is employed by the University of Barcelona. M Ascanio is an employee of BCN Health Economics & Outcomes Research S.L., Barcelona, Spain, an independent contract health economic organization. K Alving and J Syk are affiliated with Uppsala University. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. K Alving has received a consultancy fee from Intramedic AB. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1051-7
pubmed: 11948032
Eur Respir J. 2014 Jan;43(1):92-102
pubmed: 24036244
Respir Med. 2007 Nov;101(11):2263-70
pubmed: 17689234
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Dec;113(6):619-23
pubmed: 25060819
Thorax. 2017 Feb;72(2):109-116
pubmed: 27388487
Respir Med. 2006 Mar;100(3):434-50
pubmed: 16099149
Georgian Med News. 2017 Dec;(273):51-55
pubmed: 29328030
Allergy. 2009 Mar;64(3):431-8
pubmed: 19183419
Respir Med. 2008 Feb;102(2):219-31
pubmed: 18029165
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb 15;169(4):473-8
pubmed: 14644933
Adv Med Sci. 2020 Sep;65(2):244-251
pubmed: 32276003
Manag Care. 2018 Jul;27(7):42-48
pubmed: 29989901
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):185-92
pubmed: 21477457
BMC Pulm Med. 2009 May 19;9:24
pubmed: 19454036
J Breath Res. 2020 Mar 27;14(2):026014
pubmed: 31905348
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(82):1-330
pubmed: 26484874
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Nov-Dec;1(6):639-48.e1-8
pubmed: 24565712
Respir Med. 2013 Jul;107(7):943-52
pubmed: 23601567
Thorax. 2005 May;60(5):383-8
pubmed: 15860713
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(2):89-97
pubmed: 27564130
Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Dec;18(4):279-86
pubmed: 19455269
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Jan 22;85(1):
pubmed: 30741503