Comparison of diametric and volumetric changes in Stanford type B aortic dissection patients in assessing aortic remodeling post-stent graft treatment.
Aortic dissection
aortic remodeling
computed tomography angiography
maximal diameter
volume
Journal
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
3
5
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
4
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study aims to analyze the correlation between the maximal diameter (both axial and orthogonal) and volume changes in the true (TL) and false lumens (FL) after stent-grafting for Stanford type B aortic dissection. Computed tomography angiography was performed on 13 type B aortic dissection patients before and after procedure, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The lumens were divided into three regions: the stented area (Region 1), distal to the stent graft to the celiac artery (Region 2), and between the celiac artery and the iliac bifurcation (Region 3). Changes in aortic morphology were quantified by the increase or decrease of diametric and volumetric percentages from baseline measurements. At Region 1, the TL diameter and volume increased (pre-treatment: volume =51.4±41.9 mL, maximal axial diameter =22.4±6.8 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =21.6±7.2 mm; follow-up: volume =130.7±69.2 mL, maximal axial diameter =40.1±8.1 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =31.9+2.6 mm, P<0.05 for all comparisons), while FL decreased (pre-treatment: volume =129.6±150.5 mL; maximal axial diameter =43.0±15.8 mm; maximal orthogonal diameter =28.3±12.6 mm; follow-up: volume =66.6±95.0 mL, maximal axial diameter =24.5±19.9 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =16.9±13.7, P<0.05 for all comparisons). Due to the uniformity in size throughout the vessel, high concordance was observed between diametric and volumetric measurements in the stented region with 93% and 92% between maximal axial diameter and volume for the true/false lumens, and 90% and 92% between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume for the true/false lumens. Large discrepancies were observed between the different measurement methods at regions distal to the stent graft, with up to 46% differences between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume. Volume measurement was shown to be a much more sensitive indicator in identifying lumen expansion/shrinkage at the distal stented region.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The study aims to analyze the correlation between the maximal diameter (both axial and orthogonal) and volume changes in the true (TL) and false lumens (FL) after stent-grafting for Stanford type B aortic dissection.
METHOD
METHODS
Computed tomography angiography was performed on 13 type B aortic dissection patients before and after procedure, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The lumens were divided into three regions: the stented area (Region 1), distal to the stent graft to the celiac artery (Region 2), and between the celiac artery and the iliac bifurcation (Region 3). Changes in aortic morphology were quantified by the increase or decrease of diametric and volumetric percentages from baseline measurements.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At Region 1, the TL diameter and volume increased (pre-treatment: volume =51.4±41.9 mL, maximal axial diameter =22.4±6.8 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =21.6±7.2 mm; follow-up: volume =130.7±69.2 mL, maximal axial diameter =40.1±8.1 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =31.9+2.6 mm, P<0.05 for all comparisons), while FL decreased (pre-treatment: volume =129.6±150.5 mL; maximal axial diameter =43.0±15.8 mm; maximal orthogonal diameter =28.3±12.6 mm; follow-up: volume =66.6±95.0 mL, maximal axial diameter =24.5±19.9 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =16.9±13.7, P<0.05 for all comparisons). Due to the uniformity in size throughout the vessel, high concordance was observed between diametric and volumetric measurements in the stented region with 93% and 92% between maximal axial diameter and volume for the true/false lumens, and 90% and 92% between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume for the true/false lumens. Large discrepancies were observed between the different measurement methods at regions distal to the stent graft, with up to 46% differences between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Volume measurement was shown to be a much more sensitive indicator in identifying lumen expansion/shrinkage at the distal stented region.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33936960
doi: 10.21037/qims-20-814
pii: qims-11-05-1723
pmc: PMC8047377
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1723-1736Informations de copyright
2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-814). ZS serves as an unpaid associate editor of Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Feb;16(1):28-38
pubmed: 19281279
Circulation. 2005 Jun 7;111(22):2951-7
pubmed: 15927978
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Oct;21(5):697-706
pubmed: 25290799
J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Feb;11(1):1-12
pubmed: 14748634
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Aug;20(2):177-82
pubmed: 10942691
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1188-94
pubmed: 18440180
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;28(4):426-33
pubmed: 16010509
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep;50(3):510-7
pubmed: 19497701
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2002 Jul;11(4):173-8
pubmed: 16754067
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):316-24; discussion 324-5
pubmed: 21819922
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):466-74
pubmed: 19702338
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):985-92; discussion 992
pubmed: 21917398
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jun;59(6):1544-54
pubmed: 24560244
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;23(3):472-82
pubmed: 27090166
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):1059-66
pubmed: 17307460
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;43(4):386-91
pubmed: 22326695
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):928-40
pubmed: 19770313
Circulation. 2012 Jun 26;125(25):3133-41
pubmed: 22615344
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):42-7
pubmed: 20061105
J Endovasc Ther. 2008 Apr;15(2):150-60
pubmed: 18426272
J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1268-75; discussion 1275-6
pubmed: 22257648