The State of Radiology AI: Considerations for Purchase Decisions and Current Market Offerings.
Journal
Radiology. Artificial intelligence
ISSN: 2638-6100
Titre abrégé: Radiol Artif Intell
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746556
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
13
01
2020
revised:
16
06
2020
accepted:
25
06
2020
entrez:
3
5
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
4
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To provide an overview of important factors to consider when purchasing radiology artificial intelligence (AI) software and current software offerings by type, subspecialty, and modality. Important factors for consideration when purchasing AI software, including key decision makers, data ownership and privacy, cost structures, performance indicators, and potential return on investment are described. For the market overview, a list of radiology AI companies was aggregated from the Radiological Society of North America and the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine conferences (November 2016-June 2019), then narrowed to companies using deep learning for imaging analysis and diagnosis. Software created for image enhancement, reporting, or workflow management was excluded. Software was categorized by task (repetitive, quantitative, explorative, and diagnostic), modality, and subspecialty. A total of 119 software offerings from 55 companies were identified. There were 46 algorithms that currently have Food and Drug Administration and/or Conformité Européenne approval (as of November 2019). Of the 119 offerings, distribution of software targets was 34 of 70 (49%), 21 of 70 (30%), 14 of 70 (20%), and one of 70 (1%) for diagnostic, quantitative, repetitive, and explorative tasks, respectively. A plurality of companies are focused on nodule detection at chest CT and two-dimensional mammography. There is very little activity in certain subspecialties, including pediatrics and nuclear medicine. A comprehensive table is available on the website The radiology AI marketplace is rapidly maturing, with an increase in product offerings. Radiologists and practice administrators should educate themselves on current product offerings and important factors to consider before purchase and implementation.© RSNA, 2020See also the invited commentary by Sala and Ursprung in this issue.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33937846
doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020200004
pmc: PMC8082344
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e200004Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: Y.T. disclosed no relevant relationships. B.V. disclosed no relevant relationships. E.K. disclosed no relevant relationships. A.P. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: disclosed ACR Innovation grant to author’s institution for project using AI to establish benchmark for radiology report complexity. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. J.G. disclosed no relevant relationships. N.S. disclosed no relevant relationships. H.T. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: disclosed consultancy fees paid to author from Arterys and Verily. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):145
pubmed: 24658691
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Jan;7(1):016502
pubmed: 32064302
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):1210-1214
pubmed: 27313127
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22737-22745
pubmed: 31636195
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
Eye (Lond). 2019 Jan;33(1):97-109
pubmed: 30401899
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):318-328
pubmed: 29944078
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):305-314
pubmed: 30457482
Eur J Radiol. 2018 May;102:152-156
pubmed: 29685530
Eye (Lond). 2020 Mar;34(3):451-460
pubmed: 31488886
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Feb 15;12:8
pubmed: 22336388
Insights Imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):611-629
pubmed: 29934920
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Nov 9;4(1):e000234
pubmed: 29435343
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190348
pubmed: 30848808
Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):436-440
pubmed: 31573399
Insights Imaging. 2019 Apr 4;10(1):44
pubmed: 30949865
Med Decis Making. 1991 Apr-Jun;11(2):88-94
pubmed: 1907710
Acad Radiol. 2017 Apr;24(4):483-487
pubmed: 27769823
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 25;16(6):
pubmed: 30934648
J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):841-844
pubmed: 30598921
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):5-6
pubmed: 25466334
Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):739-48
pubmed: 15333795
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 29;:1-8
pubmed: 31783353