Multi-site assessment of rapid, point-of-care antigen testing for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a low-prevalence setting: A validation and implementation study.
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific
ISSN: 2666-6065
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health West Pac
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101774968
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
16
12
2020
revised:
22
01
2021
accepted:
08
02
2021
entrez:
3
5
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
4
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In Australia, COVID-19 diagnosis relies on RT-PCR testing which is relatively costly and time-consuming. To date, few studies have assessed the performance and implementation of rapid antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 testing in a setting with a low prevalence of COVID-19 infections, such as Australia. This study recruited participants presenting for COVID-19 testing at three Melbourne metropolitan hospitals during a period of low COVID-19 prevalence. The Abbott PanBio The specificity of the Abbott PanBio Given the high specificity, antigen-based tests may be most useful in rapidly triaging public health and hospital resources while expediting confirmatory RT-PCR testing. Considering the limitations in test sensitivity and the potential for rapid transmission in susceptible populations, particularly in hospital settings, careful consideration is required for implementation of antigen testing in a low prevalence setting. This work was funded by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. The funder was not involved in data analysis or manuscript preparation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In Australia, COVID-19 diagnosis relies on RT-PCR testing which is relatively costly and time-consuming. To date, few studies have assessed the performance and implementation of rapid antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 testing in a setting with a low prevalence of COVID-19 infections, such as Australia.
METHODS
METHODS
This study recruited participants presenting for COVID-19 testing at three Melbourne metropolitan hospitals during a period of low COVID-19 prevalence. The Abbott PanBio
FINDINGS
RESULTS
The specificity of the Abbott PanBio
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Given the high specificity, antigen-based tests may be most useful in rapidly triaging public health and hospital resources while expediting confirmatory RT-PCR testing. Considering the limitations in test sensitivity and the potential for rapid transmission in susceptible populations, particularly in hospital settings, careful consideration is required for implementation of antigen testing in a low prevalence setting.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
This work was funded by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. The funder was not involved in data analysis or manuscript preparation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33937887
doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100115
pii: S2666-6065(21)00024-9
pmc: PMC8076656
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100115Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SL reports grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants from American Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR), grants from Gilead Sciences, grants from Merck, grants from ViiV, grants from Leidos, grants from Wellcome Trust, grants from Australian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research (ACH2), grants from Melbourne HIV Cure Consortium, grants from Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), grants from Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), outside the submitted work. KG reports grants from Royal Australasian Society of Physicians (RACP), grants from Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), other from Isabel & John Gilbertson Charitable Trust, grants from Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Victoria, outside the submitted work.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):459-462
pubmed: 32237278
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
Pathology. 2020 Dec;52(7):754-759
pubmed: 32943228
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104448
pubmed: 32460173
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jun;127:104357
pubmed: 32305884
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459
pubmed: 32682487
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 11;11(1):5710
pubmed: 33177507
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120
pubmed: 32997903
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Apr 7;:
pubmed: 33846704
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):
pubmed: 33219112
J Med Microbiol. 2020 Sep;69(9):1169-1178
pubmed: 32755529
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 14;15(8):e0237692
pubmed: 32797094
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jul;13(7):901-905
pubmed: 32534946
Med J Aust. 2021 Feb;214(3):101-104.e1
pubmed: 33190286
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1915-1923
pubmed: 32275295
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan;31:100677
pubmed: 33521610